Implementation of GLASS-AMR: An assessment in WHO's Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Mohamed Sarhan, Shaffi Fazaludeen Koya, Elizabeth Tayler, Hala Amer, Benedetta Allegranzi, Yvan Hutin
{"title":"Implementation of GLASS-AMR: An assessment in WHO's Eastern Mediterranean Region.","authors":"Mohamed Sarhan, Shaffi Fazaludeen Koya, Elizabeth Tayler, Hala Amer, Benedetta Allegranzi, Yvan Hutin","doi":"10.1016/j.mgmed.2025.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System-antimicrobial resistance (GLASS AMR) aimed to create national surveillance systems to estimate the extent and burden of AMR globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adapted the United States Centers for Disease Control framework to evaluate GLASS-AMR implementation in WHO's Eastern Mediterranean Region by (1) describing the system and (2) reviewing its key attributes using mixed methods. We reviewed GLASS documents, reports, manuals, Regional External Quality Assessment Scheme (REQAS) survey and progress reports submitted by WHO technical consultants over the years, analyzed the surveillance data generated in the Region and finally triangulated the key findings with selected national focal points from ministries of health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All countries submitted to the GLASS at least once by 2022. Representativeness varied between countries, and the data management and reporting requirements were quite complex due to differences in the laboratory record keeping and data information systems. Patient selection process and insufficient laboratory quality assurance measures might have affected the sensitivity and quality of the data. Although in some respects the quality of data was better compared to other WHO Regions, there is substantial variation in quality and data completeness between countries within the Region. In terms of timeliness, the design of the system based on yearly reports meant that local feedback loops that would have guided timely local decision making did not always happen. GLASS demonstrated to be flexible with inclusion of new pathogens and specimen types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Variable level of quality across countries, and issues of sensitivity, representativeness, and timeliness issues might have affected the usefulness of the system to guide decision making. Implementing national AMR surveillance systems should focus on sustainability and generating and using good quality data for timely action.</p>","PeriodicalId":521161,"journal":{"name":"Mass gathering medicine (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"4 ","pages":"None"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12713532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mass gathering medicine (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgmed.2025.100046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System-antimicrobial resistance (GLASS AMR) aimed to create national surveillance systems to estimate the extent and burden of AMR globally.

Methods: We adapted the United States Centers for Disease Control framework to evaluate GLASS-AMR implementation in WHO's Eastern Mediterranean Region by (1) describing the system and (2) reviewing its key attributes using mixed methods. We reviewed GLASS documents, reports, manuals, Regional External Quality Assessment Scheme (REQAS) survey and progress reports submitted by WHO technical consultants over the years, analyzed the surveillance data generated in the Region and finally triangulated the key findings with selected national focal points from ministries of health.

Results: All countries submitted to the GLASS at least once by 2022. Representativeness varied between countries, and the data management and reporting requirements were quite complex due to differences in the laboratory record keeping and data information systems. Patient selection process and insufficient laboratory quality assurance measures might have affected the sensitivity and quality of the data. Although in some respects the quality of data was better compared to other WHO Regions, there is substantial variation in quality and data completeness between countries within the Region. In terms of timeliness, the design of the system based on yearly reports meant that local feedback loops that would have guided timely local decision making did not always happen. GLASS demonstrated to be flexible with inclusion of new pathogens and specimen types.

Conclusion: Variable level of quality across countries, and issues of sensitivity, representativeness, and timeliness issues might have affected the usefulness of the system to guide decision making. Implementing national AMR surveillance systems should focus on sustainability and generating and using good quality data for timely action.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

GLASS-AMR的实施:世卫组织东地中海区域的评估。
背景:全球抗菌素耐药性和使用监测系统-抗菌素耐药性(GLASS AMR)旨在建立国家监测系统,以估计全球抗菌素耐药性的程度和负担。方法:我们采用美国疾病控制中心的框架,通过(1)描述该系统和(2)使用混合方法审查其关键属性来评估世卫组织东地中海区域GLASS-AMR的实施情况。我们审查了GLASS文件、报告、手册、区域外部质量评估计划(REQAS)调查和世卫组织技术顾问多年来提交的进度报告,分析了该区域产生的监测数据,并最终将主要调查结果与卫生部选定的国家协调中心进行了三角测量。结果:所有国家在2022年之前至少向GLASS提交一次报告。代表性因国家而异,由于实验室记录保存和数据信息系统的差异,数据管理和报告要求相当复杂。患者选择过程和实验室质量保证措施的不足可能会影响数据的敏感性和质量。虽然在某些方面数据质量比世卫组织其他区域好,但区域内各国之间在质量和数据完整性方面存在很大差异。就时效性而言,基于年度报告的系统设计意味着指导及时的地方决策的地方反馈循环并不总是发生。GLASS在包含新的病原体和标本类型方面表现出灵活性。结论:各国不同的质量水平,以及敏感性、代表性和及时性问题可能会影响系统指导决策的有用性。实施国家抗微生物药物耐药性监测系统应注重可持续性,并为及时采取行动生成和使用高质量数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书