Proactive Text Messaging Outreach for Tobacco Cessation Among Patients With COPD Who Smoke: A Randomized Pilot.

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2025-12-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X251394351
Anne C Melzer, Adam Kaplan, Megan Campbell, David Nelson, Hildi Hagedorn, Steven S Fu
{"title":"Proactive Text Messaging Outreach for Tobacco Cessation Among Patients With COPD Who Smoke: A Randomized Pilot.","authors":"Anne C Melzer, Adam Kaplan, Megan Campbell, David Nelson, Hildi Hagedorn, Steven S Fu","doi":"10.1177/1179173X251394351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and treatment outcomes of a proactive motivational texting program with phone-based care coordination among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who smoke (PCWS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, unblinded pilot among PCWS, regardless of intention to quit smoking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consenting participants were randomized 2:1 to the intervention vs a mailed offer of cessation services. Intervention consisted of a 12-week tapering-frequency motivational texting protocol, adapted from an existing clinically available protocol. Tailoring included COPD-specific messages and the option for phone-based care coordination, connecting participants to their choice of tobacco treatments. Primary outcomes were feasibility and treatment participation through 6 months. Results were analyzed using logistic regression, adjusted for imbalanced baseline characteristics deemed a priori likely to impact cessation behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 697 invited, 125 enrolled and were randomized (83 intervention and 42 control) and 148 were ineligible, for an enrollment rate of 22.8% among eligible individuals. Primary reasons for ineligibility were: already quit or engaged in cessation efforts (n = 79), no text-capable phone (n = 50). Participants were older (mean age 68.4 years), predominantly male (82.3%) and white (78.2%). Most participants in the intervention arm completed the texting protocol (71/83, 85.5%) and responded to it at least once (63/83, 75.9%). Cessation outcomes were not statistically significant but favored the intervention. More participants in the intervention arm utilized any treatment (34.9% vs 21.9%, OR 2.37, 95%CI 0.94-6.40); 11 (13.2%) vs 1 (2.4%) (<i>P</i> = 0.053) completed a care coordination call. Acceptability of the texting protocol was high with 80.6% of participants finding the content relevant and 69.4% indicating they would recommend it. There were no identified harms. Study has completed all study procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this randomized pilot of a proactive, motivational texting program for PCWS, we found evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and possible benefits for cessation outcomes. Such a program is low burden and may be suitable for both future research and broad use.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"1179173X251394351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12715167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X251394351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and treatment outcomes of a proactive motivational texting program with phone-based care coordination among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who smoke (PCWS).

Design: Randomized, unblinded pilot among PCWS, regardless of intention to quit smoking.

Methods: Consenting participants were randomized 2:1 to the intervention vs a mailed offer of cessation services. Intervention consisted of a 12-week tapering-frequency motivational texting protocol, adapted from an existing clinically available protocol. Tailoring included COPD-specific messages and the option for phone-based care coordination, connecting participants to their choice of tobacco treatments. Primary outcomes were feasibility and treatment participation through 6 months. Results were analyzed using logistic regression, adjusted for imbalanced baseline characteristics deemed a priori likely to impact cessation behaviors.

Results: Of 697 invited, 125 enrolled and were randomized (83 intervention and 42 control) and 148 were ineligible, for an enrollment rate of 22.8% among eligible individuals. Primary reasons for ineligibility were: already quit or engaged in cessation efforts (n = 79), no text-capable phone (n = 50). Participants were older (mean age 68.4 years), predominantly male (82.3%) and white (78.2%). Most participants in the intervention arm completed the texting protocol (71/83, 85.5%) and responded to it at least once (63/83, 75.9%). Cessation outcomes were not statistically significant but favored the intervention. More participants in the intervention arm utilized any treatment (34.9% vs 21.9%, OR 2.37, 95%CI 0.94-6.40); 11 (13.2%) vs 1 (2.4%) (P = 0.053) completed a care coordination call. Acceptability of the texting protocol was high with 80.6% of participants finding the content relevant and 69.4% indicating they would recommend it. There were no identified harms. Study has completed all study procedures.

Conclusion: In this randomized pilot of a proactive, motivational texting program for PCWS, we found evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and possible benefits for cessation outcomes. Such a program is low burden and may be suitable for both future research and broad use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

主动短信推广吸烟COPD患者戒烟:一项随机试验。
目的:评估吸烟慢性阻塞性肺疾病(PCWS)患者主动激励短信计划与基于电话的护理协调的可行性、可接受性和治疗结果。设计:在PCWS患者中随机、非盲试验,不考虑戒烟意向。方法:同意的参与者按2:1随机分为干预组和邮寄戒烟服务组。干预包括一个为期12周的逐渐减少频率的动机短信协议,改编自现有的临床可用协议。定制包括copd特定信息和基于电话的护理协调选项,将参与者与他们选择的烟草治疗联系起来。主要结局是6个月的可行性和治疗参与情况。使用逻辑回归分析结果,调整被认为可能影响戒烟行为的不平衡基线特征。结果:入选697人,随机纳入125人(干预83人,对照组42人),不入选148人,入选率为22.8%。不合格的主要原因是:已经戒烟或正在戒烟(n = 79),没有可发短信的手机(n = 50)。参与者年龄较大(平均年龄68.4岁),主要是男性(82.3%)和白人(78.2%)。干预组大多数参与者完成了短信协议(71/ 83,85.5%),并至少回应了一次(63/ 83,75.9%)。戒烟结果没有统计学意义,但有利于干预。干预组中使用任何治疗的参与者较多(34.9% vs 21.9%, OR 2.37, 95%CI 0.94-6.40);11人(13.2%)对1人(2.4%)(P = 0.053)完成了护理协调电话。短信协议的可接受性很高,80.6%的参与者发现内容相关,69.4%的参与者表示他们会推荐它。没有确定的危害。研究已完成所有研究程序。结论:在这项针对PCWS的主动、激励性短信计划的随机试验中,我们发现了其可行性、可接受性和戒烟结果可能获益的证据。这样的程序负担低,可能适合未来的研究和广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书