Anne C Melzer, Adam Kaplan, Megan Campbell, David Nelson, Hildi Hagedorn, Steven S Fu
{"title":"Proactive Text Messaging Outreach for Tobacco Cessation Among Patients With COPD Who Smoke: A Randomized Pilot.","authors":"Anne C Melzer, Adam Kaplan, Megan Campbell, David Nelson, Hildi Hagedorn, Steven S Fu","doi":"10.1177/1179173X251394351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and treatment outcomes of a proactive motivational texting program with phone-based care coordination among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who smoke (PCWS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, unblinded pilot among PCWS, regardless of intention to quit smoking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consenting participants were randomized 2:1 to the intervention vs a mailed offer of cessation services. Intervention consisted of a 12-week tapering-frequency motivational texting protocol, adapted from an existing clinically available protocol. Tailoring included COPD-specific messages and the option for phone-based care coordination, connecting participants to their choice of tobacco treatments. Primary outcomes were feasibility and treatment participation through 6 months. Results were analyzed using logistic regression, adjusted for imbalanced baseline characteristics deemed a priori likely to impact cessation behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 697 invited, 125 enrolled and were randomized (83 intervention and 42 control) and 148 were ineligible, for an enrollment rate of 22.8% among eligible individuals. Primary reasons for ineligibility were: already quit or engaged in cessation efforts (n = 79), no text-capable phone (n = 50). Participants were older (mean age 68.4 years), predominantly male (82.3%) and white (78.2%). Most participants in the intervention arm completed the texting protocol (71/83, 85.5%) and responded to it at least once (63/83, 75.9%). Cessation outcomes were not statistically significant but favored the intervention. More participants in the intervention arm utilized any treatment (34.9% vs 21.9%, OR 2.37, 95%CI 0.94-6.40); 11 (13.2%) vs 1 (2.4%) (<i>P</i> = 0.053) completed a care coordination call. Acceptability of the texting protocol was high with 80.6% of participants finding the content relevant and 69.4% indicating they would recommend it. There were no identified harms. Study has completed all study procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this randomized pilot of a proactive, motivational texting program for PCWS, we found evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and possible benefits for cessation outcomes. Such a program is low burden and may be suitable for both future research and broad use.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"1179173X251394351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12715167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X251394351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and treatment outcomes of a proactive motivational texting program with phone-based care coordination among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who smoke (PCWS).
Design: Randomized, unblinded pilot among PCWS, regardless of intention to quit smoking.
Methods: Consenting participants were randomized 2:1 to the intervention vs a mailed offer of cessation services. Intervention consisted of a 12-week tapering-frequency motivational texting protocol, adapted from an existing clinically available protocol. Tailoring included COPD-specific messages and the option for phone-based care coordination, connecting participants to their choice of tobacco treatments. Primary outcomes were feasibility and treatment participation through 6 months. Results were analyzed using logistic regression, adjusted for imbalanced baseline characteristics deemed a priori likely to impact cessation behaviors.
Results: Of 697 invited, 125 enrolled and were randomized (83 intervention and 42 control) and 148 were ineligible, for an enrollment rate of 22.8% among eligible individuals. Primary reasons for ineligibility were: already quit or engaged in cessation efforts (n = 79), no text-capable phone (n = 50). Participants were older (mean age 68.4 years), predominantly male (82.3%) and white (78.2%). Most participants in the intervention arm completed the texting protocol (71/83, 85.5%) and responded to it at least once (63/83, 75.9%). Cessation outcomes were not statistically significant but favored the intervention. More participants in the intervention arm utilized any treatment (34.9% vs 21.9%, OR 2.37, 95%CI 0.94-6.40); 11 (13.2%) vs 1 (2.4%) (P = 0.053) completed a care coordination call. Acceptability of the texting protocol was high with 80.6% of participants finding the content relevant and 69.4% indicating they would recommend it. There were no identified harms. Study has completed all study procedures.
Conclusion: In this randomized pilot of a proactive, motivational texting program for PCWS, we found evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and possible benefits for cessation outcomes. Such a program is low burden and may be suitable for both future research and broad use.