Current Perspectives on Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: How to Optimize Clinical Outcomes.

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJSM.S567695
Jaydeep Dhillon, Dylan Parry, Matthew J Kraeutler
{"title":"Current Perspectives on Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: How to Optimize Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Jaydeep Dhillon, Dylan Parry, Matthew J Kraeutler","doi":"10.2147/OAJSM.S567695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative joint disease affecting approximately 22% of adults over the age of 40 and is a major contributor to pain and disability worldwide. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention as a biologic treatment for this pathology due to its potential in modulating inflammation. This narrative review evaluates the current evidence on PRP for knee OA, comparing its efficacy to hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroids, and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC). High-quality studies consistently demonstrate that PRP provides superior pain relief and functional improvement compared to HA and corticosteroids and offers comparable results to BMAC. PRP is effective across all Kellgren-Lawrence grades, with the greatest benefits seen in early to moderate OA. Three-injection regimens appear more effective than single injections, and while both leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor formulations are used, no clear consensus exists on which is superior. Despite promising short- and mid-term outcomes, variability in preparation methods and limited long-term evidence remain important limitations. Current literature suggests that PRP may be a safe and potentially effective nonoperative option for managing knee osteoarthritis, though further high-quality, standardized studies are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and optimal application.</p>","PeriodicalId":51644,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"179-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S567695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative joint disease affecting approximately 22% of adults over the age of 40 and is a major contributor to pain and disability worldwide. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention as a biologic treatment for this pathology due to its potential in modulating inflammation. This narrative review evaluates the current evidence on PRP for knee OA, comparing its efficacy to hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroids, and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC). High-quality studies consistently demonstrate that PRP provides superior pain relief and functional improvement compared to HA and corticosteroids and offers comparable results to BMAC. PRP is effective across all Kellgren-Lawrence grades, with the greatest benefits seen in early to moderate OA. Three-injection regimens appear more effective than single injections, and while both leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor formulations are used, no clear consensus exists on which is superior. Despite promising short- and mid-term outcomes, variability in preparation methods and limited long-term evidence remain important limitations. Current literature suggests that PRP may be a safe and potentially effective nonoperative option for managing knee osteoarthritis, though further high-quality, standardized studies are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and optimal application.

富血小板血浆注射治疗膝骨关节炎的现状:如何优化临床结果
膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)是一种常见的退行性关节疾病,影响了大约22%的40岁以上成年人,是全球疼痛和残疾的主要原因。富血小板血浆(PRP)由于其调节炎症的潜力,作为一种生物治疗方法已引起人们的关注。这篇叙述性综述评估了目前关于PRP治疗膝关节炎的证据,并将其与透明质酸(HA)、皮质类固醇和骨髓浓缩物(BMAC)的疗效进行了比较。高质量的研究一致表明,与HA和皮质类固醇相比,PRP提供了更好的疼痛缓解和功能改善,并提供了与BMAC相当的结果。PRP在所有Kellgren-Lawrence分级中都有效,在早期至中度OA中获益最大。三次注射方案似乎比单次注射更有效,虽然白细胞丰富和白细胞贫乏的配方都被使用,但没有明确的共识存在于哪种更优越。尽管短期和中期结果很有希望,但制备方法的可变性和有限的长期证据仍然是重要的限制。目前的文献表明,PRP可能是一种安全有效的非手术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的选择,但需要进一步的高质量、标准化的研究来证实其长期疗效和最佳应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书