Perioperative Outcomes of Postmenopausal Women with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Prophylactic Salpingo-oophorectomy.

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1801823
Eveline M Schoenmaker, Jasper F J A van Zon, Margot H M Heijmans, Johanne G Bloemen, Tanja Lettinga, Jan-Willem D de Waard, Rudi M H Roumen
{"title":"Perioperative Outcomes of Postmenopausal Women with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Prophylactic Salpingo-oophorectomy.","authors":"Eveline M Schoenmaker, Jasper F J A van Zon, Margot H M Heijmans, Johanne G Bloemen, Tanja Lettinga, Jan-Willem D de Waard, Rudi M H Roumen","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1801823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Women with colorectal cancer have an increased risk of developing ovarian malignancies, which have a poor prognosis. Shared decision making on the possibility of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy (PSO) during colorectal cancer surgery in postmenopausal women has, therefore, been implemented. Effects of PSO on perioperative parameters are unknown. This study therefore compares perioperative parameters between women with and without PSO.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Women undergoing colorectal cancer surgery between January 2020 and March 2023 in four centers in the Netherlands offering the possibility of PSO were included. Perioperative parameters were compared between the group with and without PSO.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Continuous data were analyzed with independent <i>t</i> -tests or nonparametric tests when applicable. Categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square tests. Propensity score matching was performed to control for potential confounders. The variables age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, TNM stages, and type of surgery were used as respective covariates. Perioperative data were again analyzed between the matched groups. A sensitivity analysis including all participants was performed to evaluate the effect of PSO on duration of admission and on complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present study included 112 women who underwent PSO and 28 who did not. The PSO group was significantly younger (median: 74 vs. 79 years, <i>p</i>  = 0.002), had a shorter hospital stay (median: 4 vs. 6 days, <i>p</i>  = 0.006), and experienced less overall postsurgical complications (31 vs. 64%, <i>p</i>  = 0.002). These differences were neither observed after propensity score matching nor after sensitivity analysis. Malignant adnexal tissue was identified in three patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSO in combination with elective colorectal cancer surgery in postmenopausal women does not lead to different or worse perioperative outcomes compared with the group without PSO. Nonetheless, the decision to undergo this combined surgery should be made on individual basis. Future research needs to focus on long-term follow-up and generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"14 2","pages":"251-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12714460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1801823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Women with colorectal cancer have an increased risk of developing ovarian malignancies, which have a poor prognosis. Shared decision making on the possibility of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy (PSO) during colorectal cancer surgery in postmenopausal women has, therefore, been implemented. Effects of PSO on perioperative parameters are unknown. This study therefore compares perioperative parameters between women with and without PSO.

Materials and methods: Women undergoing colorectal cancer surgery between January 2020 and March 2023 in four centers in the Netherlands offering the possibility of PSO were included. Perioperative parameters were compared between the group with and without PSO.

Statistical analysis: Continuous data were analyzed with independent t -tests or nonparametric tests when applicable. Categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square tests. Propensity score matching was performed to control for potential confounders. The variables age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, TNM stages, and type of surgery were used as respective covariates. Perioperative data were again analyzed between the matched groups. A sensitivity analysis including all participants was performed to evaluate the effect of PSO on duration of admission and on complications.

Results: The present study included 112 women who underwent PSO and 28 who did not. The PSO group was significantly younger (median: 74 vs. 79 years, p  = 0.002), had a shorter hospital stay (median: 4 vs. 6 days, p  = 0.006), and experienced less overall postsurgical complications (31 vs. 64%, p  = 0.002). These differences were neither observed after propensity score matching nor after sensitivity analysis. Malignant adnexal tissue was identified in three patients.

Conclusion: PSO in combination with elective colorectal cancer surgery in postmenopausal women does not lead to different or worse perioperative outcomes compared with the group without PSO. Nonetheless, the decision to undergo this combined surgery should be made on individual basis. Future research needs to focus on long-term follow-up and generalizability.

Abstract Image

绝经后结直肠癌患者行预防性输卵管-卵巢切除术的围手术期疗效。
目的:结直肠癌患者发生卵巢恶性肿瘤的风险增加,且预后较差。因此,在绝经后妇女结肠直肠癌手术中预防性输卵管卵巢切除术(PSO)的可能性的共同决策已经实施。PSO对围手术期参数的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究比较了有PSO和无PSO妇女的围手术期参数。材料和方法:纳入了2020年1月至2023年3月期间在荷兰四个提供PSO可能性的中心接受结直肠癌手术的妇女。比较有PSO组和无PSO组围手术期参数。统计分析:采用独立t检验或非参数检验对连续数据进行分析。分类变量分析采用卡方检验。进行倾向评分匹配以控制潜在的混杂因素。变量年龄、美国麻醉医师学会分类、TNM分期和手术类型作为各自的协变量。再次分析匹配组的围手术期资料。对所有参与者进行敏感性分析,以评估PSO对入院时间和并发症的影响。结果:本研究包括112名接受PSO的妇女和28名未接受PSO的妇女。PSO组明显更年轻(中位数:74对79岁,p = 0.002),住院时间更短(中位数:4对6天,p = 0.006),总体术后并发症更少(31对64%,p = 0.002)。在倾向评分匹配和敏感性分析后均未观察到这些差异。在3例患者中发现了恶性附件组织。结论:绝经后妇女PSO联合择期结直肠癌手术与未PSO组相比,围手术期预后无差异或更差。然而,接受联合手术的决定应根据个人情况而定。未来的研究需要关注长期随访和推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书