Induction versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Concurrent Chemoradiation: What Is Beneficial in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma-A 5-Year Comparative Study at a Tertiary Care Center in North India.

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787712
Kaneez Fatima, Asifa Andleeb, Shahida Nasreen, Mushtaq Ahmad Sofi, Ulfat Ara Wani, Malik Tariq Rasool, Arshad Manzoor Najmi, Shaqul Qamar, Nazir Ahmad, Rubiya Ryhan
{"title":"Induction versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Concurrent Chemoradiation: What Is Beneficial in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma-A 5-Year Comparative Study at a Tertiary Care Center in North India.","authors":"Kaneez Fatima, Asifa Andleeb, Shahida Nasreen, Mushtaq Ahmad Sofi, Ulfat Ara Wani, Malik Tariq Rasool, Arshad Manzoor Najmi, Shaqul Qamar, Nazir Ahmad, Rubiya Ryhan","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANPC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been established as the current standard of care, but recently, the addition of induction chemotherapy to CCRT has presented an attractive multidisciplinary approach.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore the clinical outcome of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by CCRT and CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in LANPC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study, we enrolled LANPC patients from October 2016 to June 2022. Study variables were evenly distributed by propensity score matching. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox regression analysis, and the outcome between the two chemotherapy treatment combinations was compared for patients in different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 80 patients were included in the study. Survival outcomes indicated that the IC followed by CCRT group (IC + CCRT) achieved a higher 5-year overall survival (OS; 90 vs. 81%, <i>p</i>  = 0.253), failure-free survival (FFS; 80 vs. 77.50%, <i>p</i>  = 0.17), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 88 vs. 82.50%, <i>p</i>  = 0.314) compared with the CCRT followed by AC group (CCRT + AC), although it was not statistically significant. The stratified analysis revealed that IC followed by CCRT (IC + CCRT) was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.212; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.014-3.16; <i>p</i>  = 0.0026) in N2 disease. However, the superiority of CCRT followed by AC (CCRT + AC) was only observed in LRRFS (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.05-0.89; <i>p</i>  = 0.036) for the T4 subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with LANPC, especially with T3 or N2 disease, IC should be strongly considered followed by CCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"14 2","pages":"386-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12714473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANPC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been established as the current standard of care, but recently, the addition of induction chemotherapy to CCRT has presented an attractive multidisciplinary approach.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to explore the clinical outcome of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by CCRT and CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in LANPC.

Material and methods: In this propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study, we enrolled LANPC patients from October 2016 to June 2022. Study variables were evenly distributed by propensity score matching. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox regression analysis, and the outcome between the two chemotherapy treatment combinations was compared for patients in different subgroups.

Result: A total of 80 patients were included in the study. Survival outcomes indicated that the IC followed by CCRT group (IC + CCRT) achieved a higher 5-year overall survival (OS; 90 vs. 81%, p  = 0.253), failure-free survival (FFS; 80 vs. 77.50%, p  = 0.17), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 88 vs. 82.50%, p  = 0.314) compared with the CCRT followed by AC group (CCRT + AC), although it was not statistically significant. The stratified analysis revealed that IC followed by CCRT (IC + CCRT) was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.212; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.014-3.16; p  = 0.0026) in N2 disease. However, the superiority of CCRT followed by AC (CCRT + AC) was only observed in LRRFS (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.05-0.89; p  = 0.036) for the T4 subgroup.

Conclusion: In patients with LANPC, especially with T3 or N2 disease, IC should be strongly considered followed by CCRT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

诱导化疗与辅助化疗联合同步放化疗:对局部晚期鼻咽癌有利——印度北部三级保健中心的5年比较研究
背景:在局部晚期鼻咽癌(LANPC)中,同步放化疗(CCRT)已被确立为目前的标准治疗,但最近,在CCRT的基础上增加诱导化疗已成为一种有吸引力的多学科方法。目的:探讨LANPC诱导化疗(IC) + CCRT和CCRT +辅助化疗(AC)的临床疗效。材料和方法:在这项倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究中,我们从2016年10月至2022年6月招募了LANPC患者。通过倾向得分匹配,研究变量均匀分布。采用Cox回归分析确定独立预后因素,并比较不同亚组患者两种化疗方案的预后。结果:共纳入80例患者。生存结果显示,IC + CCRT组(IC + CCRT)的5年总生存率(OS: 90比81%,p = 0.253)、无衰竭生存率(FFS: 80比77.50%,p = 0.17)和远端无转移生存率(DMFS: 88比82.50%,p = 0.314)均高于CCRT + AC组(CCRT + AC),但差异无统计学意义。分层分析显示,在N2疾病中,IC后CCRT (IC + CCRT)与OS显著改善相关(风险比[HR] = 0.212; 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.014-3.16; p = 0.0026)。然而,仅在LRRFS (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.05-0.89; p = 0.036)中观察到CCRT后AC (CCRT + AC)的优越性。结论:对于LANPC患者,特别是T3或N2病变患者,应强烈考虑在CCRT后进行IC治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书