Impact of contrast transit time on late arterial phase timing in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tomokazu Takeuchi, Soma Kumasaka, Yasuhiro Fukushima, Daisuke Ozaki, Yusuke Sato, Yuka Kumasaka, Kouichi Ujita, Takayuki Suto, Yoshito Tsushima
{"title":"Impact of contrast transit time on late arterial phase timing in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.","authors":"Tomokazu Takeuchi, Soma Kumasaka, Yasuhiro Fukushima, Daisuke Ozaki, Yusuke Sato, Yuka Kumasaka, Kouichi Ujita, Takayuki Suto, Yoshito Tsushima","doi":"10.1007/s10334-025-01316-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the physiological factors affecting the timing of late arterial phase imaging in gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI), with a focus on contrast transit times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 122 patients who underwent EOB-MRI between April and September 2024. Contrast transit times from the right atrium to the left ventricle (RA-LV time) and to the celiac artery (RA-CeA time) were measured using real-time bolus-tracking images. Using vascular enhancement patterns, the late arterial phase timing was visually assessed and categorized as Early, Appropriate, or Delayed. Differences among the imaging timing groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Welch's t tests with Holm correction, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean RA-LV times (mean ± SD, range) were 7.0 ± 1.1 s (5.0-9.0 s), 5.2 ± 0.9 s (4.0-8.0 s), and 4.7 ± 0.6 s (4.0-6.0 s) for the Early, Appropriate, and Delayed groups, respectively; significant differences were observed between Early vs. Appropriate (p < 0.001) and Appropriate vs. Delayed (p = 0.02). Correspondingly, RA-CeA times were 12.4 ± 2.0 s (10.0-15.0 s), 8.9 ± 1.8 s (5.0-14.0 s), and 7.7 ± 1.1 s (6.0-10.0 s), respectively, with significant differences between Early vs. Appropriate (p < 0.001) and Appropriate vs. Delayed (p = 0.001). Additionally, significant differences in sex and height were observed between the Early and Appropriate groups (p < 0.01). No other variables showed significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrast transit times significantly affect the appropriateness of late arterial phase imaging in EOB-MRI. Incorporating individualized transit time assessment alongside conventional bolus tracking may improve the consistency of late arterial phase acquisition and enhance the performance for diagnosing hepatic tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"663-670"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-025-01316-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the physiological factors affecting the timing of late arterial phase imaging in gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI), with a focus on contrast transit times.

Methods: This retrospective study included 122 patients who underwent EOB-MRI between April and September 2024. Contrast transit times from the right atrium to the left ventricle (RA-LV time) and to the celiac artery (RA-CeA time) were measured using real-time bolus-tracking images. Using vascular enhancement patterns, the late arterial phase timing was visually assessed and categorized as Early, Appropriate, or Delayed. Differences among the imaging timing groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Welch's t tests with Holm correction, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.

Results: Mean RA-LV times (mean ± SD, range) were 7.0 ± 1.1 s (5.0-9.0 s), 5.2 ± 0.9 s (4.0-8.0 s), and 4.7 ± 0.6 s (4.0-6.0 s) for the Early, Appropriate, and Delayed groups, respectively; significant differences were observed between Early vs. Appropriate (p < 0.001) and Appropriate vs. Delayed (p = 0.02). Correspondingly, RA-CeA times were 12.4 ± 2.0 s (10.0-15.0 s), 8.9 ± 1.8 s (5.0-14.0 s), and 7.7 ± 1.1 s (6.0-10.0 s), respectively, with significant differences between Early vs. Appropriate (p < 0.001) and Appropriate vs. Delayed (p = 0.001). Additionally, significant differences in sex and height were observed between the Early and Appropriate groups (p < 0.01). No other variables showed significant differences.

Conclusion: Contrast transit times significantly affect the appropriateness of late arterial phase imaging in EOB-MRI. Incorporating individualized transit time assessment alongside conventional bolus tracking may improve the consistency of late arterial phase acquisition and enhance the performance for diagnosing hepatic tumors.

造影剂传递时间对gd - eob - dtpa增强MRI晚期动脉相计时的影响。
目的:探讨影响钆-乙氧基苄基-二乙烯三胺-五乙酸增强MRI (EOB-MRI)动脉晚期显像时间的生理因素,重点研究造影剂传递时间。方法:回顾性研究纳入了2024年4月至9月期间接受EOB-MRI检查的122例患者。使用实时丸跟踪图像测量右心房到左心室(RA-LV时间)和腹腔动脉(RA-CeA时间)的对比传递时间。利用血管增强模式,对晚期动脉期时间进行视觉评估,并将其分为早期、适当或延迟。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和事后Welch’st检验(Holm校正)分析成像时间组间的差异,显著性阈值为p。结果:早期组、适当组和延迟组的平均RA-LV时间(Mean±SD, range)分别为7.0±1.1 s (5.0-9.0 s)、5.2±0.9 s (4.0-8.0 s)和4.7±0.6 s (4.0-6.0 s);结论:对比剂传递时间显著影响EOB-MRI晚期动脉期成像的适宜性。结合个体化的传输时间评估和常规的药物跟踪可以提高晚期动脉期采集的一致性,提高诊断肝脏肿瘤的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include: advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology, new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine, study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance, reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书