Detection of Financial Toxicity in Italian Uremic Patients: A Single Center Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.3 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Alessio Di Maria, Matteo Capone, Raul Mancini, Alfredo De Giorgi, Elisa Gavazzoli, Laura Maria Scichilone, Marco Veronesi, Simone Nicoletti, Fabio Fabbian
{"title":"Detection of Financial Toxicity in Italian Uremic Patients: A Single Center Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Alessio Di Maria, Matteo Capone, Raul Mancini, Alfredo De Giorgi, Elisa Gavazzoli, Laura Maria Scichilone, Marco Veronesi, Simone Nicoletti, Fabio Fabbian","doi":"10.2147/IJNRD.S560512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Financial toxicity (FT) describes the strain individuals and families feel when they struggle with money due to medical expenses and related costs associated with their healthcare. Management of chronic kidney disease is expensive. The aim of this study was to detect FT in Italian patients undergoing renal replacement therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>FT was investigated using the Patient-Reported Outcome for Fighting Financial Toxicity (PROFFIT) questionnaire in 238 individuals, of whom 147 (61.8%) received hemodialysis, 30 (12.6%) peritoneal dialysis, and 61 had renal transplantation (25.6%). The PROFFIT score was normalized to a 0-100% range, with 100% indicating the highest level of toxicity, and mean values were compared in the different groups of uremic patients stratified by age, sex and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the population was 66.2±13.7 years (range 23-89). The probability of FT due to financial distress in the whole population that was 42.1±24.1%, whilst mean probability of FT due to medical expenses response was 44.9±27.6%, mean probability of FT due to transportation response was 37.1±29.4% and mean probability of FT due to support from the Health System was 25.5±23.3%. FT was higher in the hemodialysis group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hemodialysis patients showed worse financial burden than peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplanted patients, while peritoneal dialysis subjects felt better cared for by health care professionals than kidney transplanted individuals, however the latter group could afford monthly expenses better than hemodialysis patients. Health care professionals should discuss financial problems or other social challenges that may impact on the health of uremic individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease","volume":"18 ","pages":"361-371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S560512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Financial toxicity (FT) describes the strain individuals and families feel when they struggle with money due to medical expenses and related costs associated with their healthcare. Management of chronic kidney disease is expensive. The aim of this study was to detect FT in Italian patients undergoing renal replacement therapy.

Patients and methods: FT was investigated using the Patient-Reported Outcome for Fighting Financial Toxicity (PROFFIT) questionnaire in 238 individuals, of whom 147 (61.8%) received hemodialysis, 30 (12.6%) peritoneal dialysis, and 61 had renal transplantation (25.6%). The PROFFIT score was normalized to a 0-100% range, with 100% indicating the highest level of toxicity, and mean values were compared in the different groups of uremic patients stratified by age, sex and treatment.

Results: Mean age of the population was 66.2±13.7 years (range 23-89). The probability of FT due to financial distress in the whole population that was 42.1±24.1%, whilst mean probability of FT due to medical expenses response was 44.9±27.6%, mean probability of FT due to transportation response was 37.1±29.4% and mean probability of FT due to support from the Health System was 25.5±23.3%. FT was higher in the hemodialysis group.

Conclusion: Hemodialysis patients showed worse financial burden than peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplanted patients, while peritoneal dialysis subjects felt better cared for by health care professionals than kidney transplanted individuals, however the latter group could afford monthly expenses better than hemodialysis patients. Health care professionals should discuss financial problems or other social challenges that may impact on the health of uremic individuals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

意大利尿毒症患者的金融毒性检测:单中心横断面研究。
目的:财务毒性(Financial toxicity, FT)描述了当个人和家庭因医疗费用和与医疗保健相关的费用而与金钱作斗争时所感受到的压力。慢性肾脏疾病的治疗费用昂贵。本研究的目的是在意大利接受肾脏替代治疗的患者中检测FT。患者和方法:采用患者报告的抗财务毒性结果(PROFFIT)问卷调查238人的FT,其中147人(61.8%)接受血液透析,30人(12.6%)接受腹膜透析,61人接受肾移植(25.6%)。PROFFIT评分归一化到0-100%的范围内,100%表示毒性水平最高,并比较按年龄、性别和治疗分层的不同组尿毒症患者的平均值。结果:患者平均年龄为66.2±13.7岁(23 ~ 89岁)。在整个人口中,因经济困难而发生金融危机的概率为42.1±24.1%,而因医疗费用反应而发生金融危机的平均概率为44.9±27.6%,因交通反应而发生金融危机的平均概率为37.1±29.4%,因卫生系统支持而发生金融危机的平均概率为25.5±23.3%。血液透析组FT较高。结论:血透患者的经济负担较腹膜透析和肾移植患者更重,腹膜透析患者比肾移植患者得到更好的医护人员的照顾,但肾移植患者比血透患者更能负担每月的费用。卫生保健专业人员应讨论可能影响尿毒症患者健康的经济问题或其他社会挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the pathophysiology of the kidney and vascular supply. Epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment interventions are covered as well as basic science, biochemical and immunological studies. In particular, emphasis will be given to: -Chronic kidney disease- Complications of renovascular disease- Imaging techniques- Renal hypertension- Renal cancer- Treatment including pharmacological and transplantation- Dialysis and treatment of complications of dialysis and renal disease- Quality of Life- Patient satisfaction and preference- Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports. The main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans but preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书