Alessio Di Maria, Matteo Capone, Raul Mancini, Alfredo De Giorgi, Elisa Gavazzoli, Laura Maria Scichilone, Marco Veronesi, Simone Nicoletti, Fabio Fabbian
{"title":"Detection of Financial Toxicity in Italian Uremic Patients: A Single Center Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Alessio Di Maria, Matteo Capone, Raul Mancini, Alfredo De Giorgi, Elisa Gavazzoli, Laura Maria Scichilone, Marco Veronesi, Simone Nicoletti, Fabio Fabbian","doi":"10.2147/IJNRD.S560512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Financial toxicity (FT) describes the strain individuals and families feel when they struggle with money due to medical expenses and related costs associated with their healthcare. Management of chronic kidney disease is expensive. The aim of this study was to detect FT in Italian patients undergoing renal replacement therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>FT was investigated using the Patient-Reported Outcome for Fighting Financial Toxicity (PROFFIT) questionnaire in 238 individuals, of whom 147 (61.8%) received hemodialysis, 30 (12.6%) peritoneal dialysis, and 61 had renal transplantation (25.6%). The PROFFIT score was normalized to a 0-100% range, with 100% indicating the highest level of toxicity, and mean values were compared in the different groups of uremic patients stratified by age, sex and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the population was 66.2±13.7 years (range 23-89). The probability of FT due to financial distress in the whole population that was 42.1±24.1%, whilst mean probability of FT due to medical expenses response was 44.9±27.6%, mean probability of FT due to transportation response was 37.1±29.4% and mean probability of FT due to support from the Health System was 25.5±23.3%. FT was higher in the hemodialysis group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hemodialysis patients showed worse financial burden than peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplanted patients, while peritoneal dialysis subjects felt better cared for by health care professionals than kidney transplanted individuals, however the latter group could afford monthly expenses better than hemodialysis patients. Health care professionals should discuss financial problems or other social challenges that may impact on the health of uremic individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease","volume":"18 ","pages":"361-371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S560512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Financial toxicity (FT) describes the strain individuals and families feel when they struggle with money due to medical expenses and related costs associated with their healthcare. Management of chronic kidney disease is expensive. The aim of this study was to detect FT in Italian patients undergoing renal replacement therapy.
Patients and methods: FT was investigated using the Patient-Reported Outcome for Fighting Financial Toxicity (PROFFIT) questionnaire in 238 individuals, of whom 147 (61.8%) received hemodialysis, 30 (12.6%) peritoneal dialysis, and 61 had renal transplantation (25.6%). The PROFFIT score was normalized to a 0-100% range, with 100% indicating the highest level of toxicity, and mean values were compared in the different groups of uremic patients stratified by age, sex and treatment.
Results: Mean age of the population was 66.2±13.7 years (range 23-89). The probability of FT due to financial distress in the whole population that was 42.1±24.1%, whilst mean probability of FT due to medical expenses response was 44.9±27.6%, mean probability of FT due to transportation response was 37.1±29.4% and mean probability of FT due to support from the Health System was 25.5±23.3%. FT was higher in the hemodialysis group.
Conclusion: Hemodialysis patients showed worse financial burden than peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplanted patients, while peritoneal dialysis subjects felt better cared for by health care professionals than kidney transplanted individuals, however the latter group could afford monthly expenses better than hemodialysis patients. Health care professionals should discuss financial problems or other social challenges that may impact on the health of uremic individuals.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the pathophysiology of the kidney and vascular supply. Epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment interventions are covered as well as basic science, biochemical and immunological studies. In particular, emphasis will be given to: -Chronic kidney disease- Complications of renovascular disease- Imaging techniques- Renal hypertension- Renal cancer- Treatment including pharmacological and transplantation- Dialysis and treatment of complications of dialysis and renal disease- Quality of Life- Patient satisfaction and preference- Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports. The main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans but preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies and interventions.