Does Evidence Support an Emotion Regulation Model of Anorexia Nervosa? A Systematic Review of Over a Decade of Research.

IF 6.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Clinical Psychology-science and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1037/cps0000244
Valerie Z Wong, Emily M Koithan, Bolade M Santos, Adanya Johnson, Ann F Haynos
{"title":"Does Evidence Support an Emotion Regulation Model of Anorexia Nervosa? A Systematic Review of Over a Decade of Research.","authors":"Valerie Z Wong, Emily M Koithan, Bolade M Santos, Adanya Johnson, Ann F Haynos","doi":"10.1037/cps0000244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Over a decade ago, a model was proposed to explain the role of emotion regulation in the development and maintenance of anorexia nervosa (AN). Research on emotion regulation in AN has since rapidly increased, prompting a need to revisit the evidence base regarding whether AN may be considered a disorder of emotion regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science on the emotion regulation literature in the years following the proposal of this emotion regulation model. Inclusion criteria were: (a) empirical and quantitative articles in English; (b) human samples; (c) analysis pertaining to AN; and (d) focused on a domain of emotion regulation. The review yielded 134 eligible articles (from a pool of 562 non-duplicate studies) examining emotion regulation constructs in AN, encompassing individual-level emotional and environmental vulnerabilities, use of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, and eating disorder behaviors as emotion regulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, evidence supported the relevance of emotion regulation to the conceptualization of AN. Individuals with AN demonstrated greater individual and environmental vulnerabilities to dysregulation, less adaptive and more maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, and greater tendency to engage in eating disorder behaviors to regulate emotions. Findings on emotional reactivity were more mixed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results highlight that continued research on emotion regulation across restrictive eating presentations is needed. Further, treatments directly targeting emotion regulation warrant further investigation. Emotion regulation models continue to hold promise in characterizing core mechanisms of AN.</p>","PeriodicalId":10434,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12716886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Over a decade ago, a model was proposed to explain the role of emotion regulation in the development and maintenance of anorexia nervosa (AN). Research on emotion regulation in AN has since rapidly increased, prompting a need to revisit the evidence base regarding whether AN may be considered a disorder of emotion regulation.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science on the emotion regulation literature in the years following the proposal of this emotion regulation model. Inclusion criteria were: (a) empirical and quantitative articles in English; (b) human samples; (c) analysis pertaining to AN; and (d) focused on a domain of emotion regulation. The review yielded 134 eligible articles (from a pool of 562 non-duplicate studies) examining emotion regulation constructs in AN, encompassing individual-level emotional and environmental vulnerabilities, use of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, and eating disorder behaviors as emotion regulation.

Results: Overall, evidence supported the relevance of emotion regulation to the conceptualization of AN. Individuals with AN demonstrated greater individual and environmental vulnerabilities to dysregulation, less adaptive and more maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, and greater tendency to engage in eating disorder behaviors to regulate emotions. Findings on emotional reactivity were more mixed.

Discussion: Results highlight that continued research on emotion regulation across restrictive eating presentations is needed. Further, treatments directly targeting emotion regulation warrant further investigation. Emotion regulation models continue to hold promise in characterizing core mechanisms of AN.

神经性厌食症的情绪调节模型有证据支持吗?十多年研究的系统回顾。
目的:十多年前,人们提出了一个模型来解释情绪调节在神经性厌食症(AN)的发展和维持中的作用。自那以后,对AN的情绪调节的研究迅速增加,促使人们需要重新审视AN是否可以被认为是一种情绪调节障碍的证据基础。方法:我们在PubMed、PsychInfo和Web of Science上使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南对该情绪调节模型提出后的几年中有关情绪调节的文献进行了系统评价。纳入标准为:(a)英语的实证和定量文章;(b)人体样本;(c)与AN有关的分析;(d)专注于情绪调节领域。该综述产生了134篇符合条件的文章(来自562篇非重复研究),研究了AN中的情绪调节结构,包括个人层面的情绪和环境脆弱性,适应性和非适应性情绪调节策略的使用,以及作为情绪调节的饮食失调行为。结果:总体而言,证据支持情绪调节与AN概念化的相关性。患有AN的个体表现出更大的个体和环境对失调的脆弱性,更少的适应性和更多的适应性不良情绪调节策略,更倾向于参与饮食失调行为来调节情绪。关于情绪反应的研究结果则更为复杂。讨论:结果强调,需要对限制性饮食表现的情绪调节进行持续研究。此外,直接针对情绪调节的治疗方法值得进一步研究。情绪调节模型在描述AN的核心机制方面继续具有前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice presents cutting-edge developments in the science and practice of clinical psychology and related mental health fields by publishing scholarly articles, primarily involving narrative and systematic reviews as well as meta-analyses related to assessment, intervention, and service delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书