Measuring provider-level differences in perioperative workflow using computer vision-based artificial intelligence.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Theoren Loo, Brandon Mcglennen, Stephen Incavo, Nate Hilger
{"title":"Measuring provider-level differences in perioperative workflow using computer vision-based artificial intelligence.","authors":"Theoren Loo, Brandon Mcglennen, Stephen Incavo, Nate Hilger","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate provider-level variability across the full perioperative workflow using a computer vision-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that automatically detects and timestamps operating room events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of total knee arthroplasty cases performed between September 2022 and March 2025 at a regional health system was conducted. An ambient surgical platform equipped with wall-mounted cameras continuously captured perioperative activity. A YOLO-based model identified patients, staff and equipment, and a transformer-based event detector predicted key perioperative events in real time. Detected events were used to segment cases into eight workflow phases: anaesthesia induction, patient preparation, final preparation, active procedure, postoperation, patient exit, room cleanup and room setup. Provider-level variability in segment durations was evaluated after adjusting for case characteristics, daily surgical volume and team composition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The computer vision event detection system achieved high agreement with ground truth annotations. Across 2502 surgical cases, significant provider-level variability was observed in all workflow segments except for room exit. Active procedure showed the greatest variation among surgeons (F=28.4, p<0.001; β IQR=-20.9 to 8.8 min) followed by room setup among circulating nurses (F=1.3, p<0.001; β IQR=-5.2 to 4.4 min) and room setup among scrub nurses (F=1.4, p<0.001; β IQR=-3.7 to 3.2 min).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated workflow segmentation using computer vision provides a scalable method to evaluate perioperative efficiency with greater granularity. Broader case segmentation may support more targeted and effective surgical quality improvement initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12718557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate provider-level variability across the full perioperative workflow using a computer vision-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that automatically detects and timestamps operating room events.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of total knee arthroplasty cases performed between September 2022 and March 2025 at a regional health system was conducted. An ambient surgical platform equipped with wall-mounted cameras continuously captured perioperative activity. A YOLO-based model identified patients, staff and equipment, and a transformer-based event detector predicted key perioperative events in real time. Detected events were used to segment cases into eight workflow phases: anaesthesia induction, patient preparation, final preparation, active procedure, postoperation, patient exit, room cleanup and room setup. Provider-level variability in segment durations was evaluated after adjusting for case characteristics, daily surgical volume and team composition.

Results: The computer vision event detection system achieved high agreement with ground truth annotations. Across 2502 surgical cases, significant provider-level variability was observed in all workflow segments except for room exit. Active procedure showed the greatest variation among surgeons (F=28.4, p<0.001; β IQR=-20.9 to 8.8 min) followed by room setup among circulating nurses (F=1.3, p<0.001; β IQR=-5.2 to 4.4 min) and room setup among scrub nurses (F=1.4, p<0.001; β IQR=-3.7 to 3.2 min).

Conclusions: Automated workflow segmentation using computer vision provides a scalable method to evaluate perioperative efficiency with greater granularity. Broader case segmentation may support more targeted and effective surgical quality improvement initiatives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用基于计算机视觉的人工智能测量围手术期工作流程中提供者级别的差异。
目的:使用基于计算机视觉的人工智能(AI)系统评估整个围手术期工作流程中提供者级别的可变性,该系统可以自动检测手术室事件并为其添加时间戳。方法:对2022年9月至2025年3月在某地区卫生系统进行的全膝关节置换术病例进行横断面研究。配有壁挂式摄像机的环境手术平台连续捕捉围手术期活动。基于yolo的模型可以识别患者、工作人员和设备,基于变压器的事件检测器可以实时预测关键的围手术期事件。使用检测到的事件将病例划分为八个工作流程阶段:麻醉诱导、患者准备、最终准备、主动程序、术后、患者退出、房间清理和房间设置。在调整了病例特征、每日手术量和团队组成后,评估了提供者水平的分段持续时间的可变性。结果:计算机视觉事件检测系统与地面真值标注具有较高的一致性。在2502例手术病例中,除房间出口外,在所有工作流程部分都观察到显著的提供者水平差异。结论:使用计算机视觉的自动化工作流程分割提供了一种可扩展的方法,以更大的粒度评估围手术期效率。更广泛的病例分割可能支持更有针对性和更有效的手术质量改进举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书