A systematic analysis of generative artificial intelligence for supply chain transformation

Supply Chain Analytics Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.sca.2025.100188
Zied Bahroun , Afef Saihi , Rami As’ad , Moayad Tanash
{"title":"A systematic analysis of generative artificial intelligence for supply chain transformation","authors":"Zied Bahroun ,&nbsp;Afef Saihi ,&nbsp;Rami As’ad ,&nbsp;Moayad Tanash","doi":"10.1016/j.sca.2025.100188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global supply chains face persistent disruptions from geopolitical shocks, sustainability pressures, and volatile demand, creating an increasing need for resilient and transparent operations. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), including Large Language Models (LLMs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and multimodal generative systems, is emerging as a new decision layer that can generate scenarios, synthetic data, and actionable textual insights rather than only point predictions. This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic review analyzes 98 peer-reviewed studies on GAI applications in Supply Chain Management (SCM) and, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, provides the first combined thematic and Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model-based mapping of these applications. Publication activity shows a sharp upward trend, with fewer than five papers published before 2021 and 45 published in 2024 alone. Nearly four-fifths of the reported applications focus on the Plan and Enable processes, while the Make and Return processes account for only 4 % and 1 % of the coded functions, respectively. Although LLM- and Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-based models underpin over 40 % of the implementations, approximately 45 % of the studies do not fully specify their underlying architectures, indicating methodological immaturity. Reported benefits are concentrated in demand forecasting and risk analysis, supplier screening, logistics visibility, and sustainability analytics; however, most evidence remains at the prototype level and rarely reports system-wide Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). The review concludes with a targeted research agenda that emphasizes longitudinal evaluation, hybrid GAI-driven optimization with digital twin architectures, and governance-by-design frameworks to support the responsible and scalable adoption of GAI in supply chains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101186,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Analytics","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949863525000883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global supply chains face persistent disruptions from geopolitical shocks, sustainability pressures, and volatile demand, creating an increasing need for resilient and transparent operations. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), including Large Language Models (LLMs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and multimodal generative systems, is emerging as a new decision layer that can generate scenarios, synthetic data, and actionable textual insights rather than only point predictions. This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic review analyzes 98 peer-reviewed studies on GAI applications in Supply Chain Management (SCM) and, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, provides the first combined thematic and Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model-based mapping of these applications. Publication activity shows a sharp upward trend, with fewer than five papers published before 2021 and 45 published in 2024 alone. Nearly four-fifths of the reported applications focus on the Plan and Enable processes, while the Make and Return processes account for only 4 % and 1 % of the coded functions, respectively. Although LLM- and Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-based models underpin over 40 % of the implementations, approximately 45 % of the studies do not fully specify their underlying architectures, indicating methodological immaturity. Reported benefits are concentrated in demand forecasting and risk analysis, supplier screening, logistics visibility, and sustainability analytics; however, most evidence remains at the prototype level and rarely reports system-wide Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). The review concludes with a targeted research agenda that emphasizes longitudinal evaluation, hybrid GAI-driven optimization with digital twin architectures, and governance-by-design frameworks to support the responsible and scalable adoption of GAI in supply chains.
供应链转型中生成式人工智能的系统分析
全球供应链面临地缘政治冲击、可持续性压力和需求波动带来的持续中断,因此对弹性和透明运营的需求日益增加。生成式人工智能(GAI),包括大型语言模型(llm)、生成式对抗网络(gan)和多模态生成系统,正在作为一个新的决策层出现,它可以生成场景、合成数据和可操作的文本洞察,而不仅仅是点预测。这个首选报告项目系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指导的系统审查分析了98个同行评议的供应链管理(SCM)中GAI应用的研究,并且,据作者所知,提供了这些应用的第一个结合主题和供应链操作参考(SCOR)模型的映射。发表活动呈急剧上升趋势,2021年之前发表的论文不足5篇,仅2024年就有45篇。将近五分之四的报告应用程序集中在计划和启用过程上,而制造和返回过程分别只占编码功能的4% %和1% %。尽管基于LLM和生成预训练转换器(GPT)的模型支撑了超过40% %的实现,但是大约45% %的研究并没有完全指定它们的底层架构,这表明了方法论的不成熟。报告的好处集中在需求预测和风险分析,供应商筛选,物流可见性和可持续性分析;然而,大多数证据仍然停留在原型水平,很少报告全系统的关键绩效指标(kpi)。该报告总结了一项有针对性的研究议程,强调纵向评估、混合ai驱动优化与数字孪生架构,以及设计治理框架,以支持供应链中负责任和可扩展地采用GAI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书