Impact of ray generation schemes on the random ray method for eigenvalue and shielding applications

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Nuclear Engineering and Design Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114701
Shuai Qin, Jiacheng Li, Xiangchun Tian, Shihong Li, Qian Zhang
{"title":"Impact of ray generation schemes on the random ray method for eigenvalue and shielding applications","authors":"Shuai Qin,&nbsp;Jiacheng Li,&nbsp;Xiangchun Tian,&nbsp;Shihong Li,&nbsp;Qian Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a variant of the Method Of characteristics (MOC), The Random Ray Method (TRRM) stochastically generates the characteristic rays within the solution domain, making it a stochastic-deterministic hybrid method for the particle transport calculation. Compared to traditional MOC, TRRM significantly reduces computational memory footprint and greatly enhances the flexibility of MOC for a high-fidelity 3D simulation of reactors. However, the introduction of stochastic discretization leads to uncertainty with a convergence rate of <span><math><mi>O</mi><mfenced><msup><mi>N</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mfenced></math></span> in the results of TRRM, akin to the standard Monte Carlo method. This study focuses on improving the performance of TRRM by investigating different ray generation schemes, which are divided into two components: sampling methods and random number generation techniques. Three sampling strategies—uniform sampling, mesh-based stratified sampling, and Latin hypercube sampling—are combined with two random number generation techniques—pseudo-random numbers (PRN) and Low-Discrepancy Sequences (LDS)—to create six distinct schemes. The performance of these schemes is evaluated using the 2D C5G7 criticality benchmark and the 3D Kobayashi fixed-source benchmark. Numerical results from the C5G7 benchmark show that the combination of uniform sampling and LDS yields the best performance, reducing the uncertainty in <em>k</em><sub>eff</sub> and decreasing the required calculation time for active batches by more than a factor of seven. Latin hypercube sampling also demonstrates better performance, but its combination with LDS yields no benefits. For the Kobayashi benchmark, the uniform sampling with LDS also shows best performance, but advanced sampling methods like stratified and Latin hypercube sampling do not offer significant improvements and can introduce statistical oscillations. Therefore, the uniform sampling with LDS is highly recommended for TRRM on further applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"448 ","pages":"Article 114701"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325008787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a variant of the Method Of characteristics (MOC), The Random Ray Method (TRRM) stochastically generates the characteristic rays within the solution domain, making it a stochastic-deterministic hybrid method for the particle transport calculation. Compared to traditional MOC, TRRM significantly reduces computational memory footprint and greatly enhances the flexibility of MOC for a high-fidelity 3D simulation of reactors. However, the introduction of stochastic discretization leads to uncertainty with a convergence rate of ON−1/2 in the results of TRRM, akin to the standard Monte Carlo method. This study focuses on improving the performance of TRRM by investigating different ray generation schemes, which are divided into two components: sampling methods and random number generation techniques. Three sampling strategies—uniform sampling, mesh-based stratified sampling, and Latin hypercube sampling—are combined with two random number generation techniques—pseudo-random numbers (PRN) and Low-Discrepancy Sequences (LDS)—to create six distinct schemes. The performance of these schemes is evaluated using the 2D C5G7 criticality benchmark and the 3D Kobayashi fixed-source benchmark. Numerical results from the C5G7 benchmark show that the combination of uniform sampling and LDS yields the best performance, reducing the uncertainty in keff and decreasing the required calculation time for active batches by more than a factor of seven. Latin hypercube sampling also demonstrates better performance, but its combination with LDS yields no benefits. For the Kobayashi benchmark, the uniform sampling with LDS also shows best performance, but advanced sampling methods like stratified and Latin hypercube sampling do not offer significant improvements and can introduce statistical oscillations. Therefore, the uniform sampling with LDS is highly recommended for TRRM on further applications.
射线生成方案对随机射线法特征值和屏蔽应用的影响
随机射线法(TRRM)作为特征法(MOC)的一种变体,在解域内随机生成特征射线,是一种用于粒子输运计算的随机-确定性混合方法。与传统的MOC相比,TRRM大大减少了计算内存占用,并大大提高了MOC的灵活性,从而实现了高保真的反应堆三维仿真。然而,随机离散化的引入导致TRRM结果的不确定性,其收敛率为ON−1/2,类似于标准蒙特卡罗方法。本研究着重于通过研究不同的射线生成方案来提高TRRM的性能,这些方案分为两部分:采样方法和随机数生成技术。三种抽样策略(均匀抽样、基于网格的分层抽样和拉丁超立方体抽样)与两种随机数生成技术(伪随机数(PRN)和低差异序列(LDS))相结合,创建了六种不同的方案。采用二维C5G7临界基准和三维Kobayashi固定源基准对这些方案的性能进行了评估。C5G7基准的数值结果表明,均匀采样和LDS的组合产生了最佳性能,减少了keff的不确定性,并将活性批次所需的计算时间减少了七倍以上。拉丁超立方体采样也显示出更好的性能,但它与LDS的组合没有任何好处。对于Kobayashi基准,使用LDS的均匀抽样也显示出最佳性能,但分层和拉丁超立方体抽样等高级抽样方法没有提供显着的改进,并且可能引入统计振荡。因此,在TRRM的进一步应用中,强烈建议使用LDS进行均匀采样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书