Correlation between epigenetic modifier gene mutations and prognosis of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Hematology Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-19 DOI:10.1080/16078454.2025.2603059
Rui-Qi Wang, Bing Han, Hai-Yu Song, Li Yu
{"title":"Correlation between epigenetic modifier gene mutations and prognosis of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Rui-Qi Wang, Bing Han, Hai-Yu Song, Li Yu","doi":"10.1080/16078454.2025.2603059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of epigenetic modifier gene mutations (EMMs) on the prognosis of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is controversial, which is unlike AML. A meta-analysis is needed to evaluate the prognostic value of EMMs in ALL.</p><p><p>Three databases, including PubMed, EMBase and Web of Science, were retrieved to find out studies exploring the association of EMMs and survival outcomes in ALL. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidential interval (95%CI) were used to assess the impact of EMMs.</p><p><p>Nineteen studies were included in our meta-analysis. <i>DNMT3A</i> mutation was an adverse prognostic factor in overall survival (OS) in patients with ALL (HR, 4.143; <i>P</i> <i><</i> 0.001) as well as adult T-ALL patients (HR, 3.746; <i>P</i> <i><</i> 0.001) and those with early T-ALL (HR, 3.523; <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.001). <i>IDH</i> mutation also had an unfavorable impact on OS in ALL (HR, 3.583; <i>P</i> <i><</i> 0.001) and adult T-ALL cohort (HR, 3.562; <i>P</i> <i><</i> 0.001). For pediatric patients, mutant <i>PHF6</i> was significantly associated with worse OS in both B-ALL (HR, 3.194; <i>P</i> = 0.026) and T-ALL (HR, 2.125; <i>P</i> = 0.033), while <i>PHF6</i> mutation had no prognostic impact on the survival of adult T-ALL patients. In addition, patients with <i>KMT2A</i> mutation had shorter OS compared to those with wild type (HR, 4.605; <i>P</i> = 0.045), whereas other EMMs had no impact on prognosis in any type of ALL.</p><p><p>Mutations in <i>DNMT3A</i>, <i>IDH</i>, <i>PHF6</i> and <i>KMT2A</i> showed a significant prognostic effect in ALL or in its specific subtypes, which might contribute to risk stratification and treatment guidance in the management of ALL patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13161,"journal":{"name":"Hematology","volume":"31 1","pages":"2603059"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2025.2603059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of epigenetic modifier gene mutations (EMMs) on the prognosis of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is controversial, which is unlike AML. A meta-analysis is needed to evaluate the prognostic value of EMMs in ALL.

Three databases, including PubMed, EMBase and Web of Science, were retrieved to find out studies exploring the association of EMMs and survival outcomes in ALL. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidential interval (95%CI) were used to assess the impact of EMMs.

Nineteen studies were included in our meta-analysis. DNMT3A mutation was an adverse prognostic factor in overall survival (OS) in patients with ALL (HR, 4.143; P < 0.001) as well as adult T-ALL patients (HR, 3.746; P < 0.001) and those with early T-ALL (HR, 3.523; P = 0.001). IDH mutation also had an unfavorable impact on OS in ALL (HR, 3.583; P < 0.001) and adult T-ALL cohort (HR, 3.562; P < 0.001). For pediatric patients, mutant PHF6 was significantly associated with worse OS in both B-ALL (HR, 3.194; P = 0.026) and T-ALL (HR, 2.125; P = 0.033), while PHF6 mutation had no prognostic impact on the survival of adult T-ALL patients. In addition, patients with KMT2A mutation had shorter OS compared to those with wild type (HR, 4.605; P = 0.045), whereas other EMMs had no impact on prognosis in any type of ALL.

Mutations in DNMT3A, IDH, PHF6 and KMT2A showed a significant prognostic effect in ALL or in its specific subtypes, which might contribute to risk stratification and treatment guidance in the management of ALL patients.

表观遗传修饰基因突变与急性淋巴细胞白血病患者预后的相关性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
表观遗传修饰基因突变(EMMs)对急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者预后的影响存在争议,这与AML不同。需要荟萃分析来评估emm在ALL中的预后价值。检索三个数据库,包括PubMed、EMBase和Web of Science,以找出探讨ALL中emm与生存结果之间关系的研究。合并风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(95% ci)用于评估emm的影响。我们的荟萃分析纳入了19项研究。DNMT3A突变是ALL患者(HR, 4.143, P = 0.001)、成年T-ALL患者(HR, 3.746, P = 0.001)和早期T-ALL患者(HR, 3.523, P = 0.001)总生存期(OS)的不良预后因素。IDH突变对ALL (HR, 3.583; P 0.001)和成人T-ALL队列的OS也有不利影响(HR, 3.562; P 0.001)。在儿童患者中,PHF6突变体与B-ALL (HR, 3.194; P = 0.026)和T-ALL (HR, 2.125; P = 0.033)的OS恶化均显著相关,而PHF6突变体对成人T-ALL患者的生存无预后影响。此外,与野生型相比,KMT2A突变患者的OS较短(HR, 4.605; P = 0.045),而其他EMMs对任何类型ALL的预后均无影响。DNMT3A、IDH、PHF6和KMT2A突变在ALL或其特定亚型中表现出显著的预后影响,这可能有助于ALL患者管理的风险分层和治疗指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hematology
Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
140
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Hematology is an international journal publishing original and review articles in the field of general hematology, including oncology, pathology, biology, clinical research and epidemiology. Of the fixed sections, annotations are accepted on any general or scientific field: technical annotations covering current laboratory practice in general hematology, blood transfusion and clinical trials, and current clinical practice reviews the consensus driven areas of care and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书