Co-evolved value transfer: Managing subsidiary managers’ reinterpretation of headquarter values

IF 6.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
International Business Review Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102553
Meng Zhao , Seung Ho Park , Marie K. Harder
{"title":"Co-evolved value transfer: Managing subsidiary managers’ reinterpretation of headquarter values","authors":"Meng Zhao ,&nbsp;Seung Ho Park ,&nbsp;Marie K. Harder","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transferring headquarters’ (HQ) organizational values is crucial for multinational corporations (MNCs) to align subsidiary managers’ behavior with the global value system. However, subsidiary managers tend to reinterpret HQ values to advance local interests and agendas, potentially causing local behavior to deviate from global expectations. Drawing on a multiple-case study of value transfer activities in the Chinese subsidiaries of seven MNCs, we found that the impact of value reinterpretation on value transfer outcomes—whether constructive or destructive—depends on whether subsidiary managers, acting as either value senders or recipients, engage with one another to foster a <em>co-evolved</em> process of <em>anchoring, calibrating,</em> and <em>accommodating</em> value reinterpretation. This study reveals how intra-subsidiary interactions among subsidiary managers can transform value reinterpretation into a source of knowledge creation, enabling HQ values to continuously guide local behavior while adapting to local realities. Our findings also offer insights into how MNCs can reconcile competing demands in the internationalization process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 102553"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125001660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transferring headquarters’ (HQ) organizational values is crucial for multinational corporations (MNCs) to align subsidiary managers’ behavior with the global value system. However, subsidiary managers tend to reinterpret HQ values to advance local interests and agendas, potentially causing local behavior to deviate from global expectations. Drawing on a multiple-case study of value transfer activities in the Chinese subsidiaries of seven MNCs, we found that the impact of value reinterpretation on value transfer outcomes—whether constructive or destructive—depends on whether subsidiary managers, acting as either value senders or recipients, engage with one another to foster a co-evolved process of anchoring, calibrating, and accommodating value reinterpretation. This study reveals how intra-subsidiary interactions among subsidiary managers can transform value reinterpretation into a source of knowledge creation, enabling HQ values to continuously guide local behavior while adapting to local realities. Our findings also offer insights into how MNCs can reconcile competing demands in the internationalization process.
共同演化的价值转移:管理子公司经理对总部价值观的重新诠释
跨国公司要使子公司管理者的行为与全球价值体系保持一致,总部组织价值观的转移至关重要。然而,子公司经理往往会重新解释总部的价值观,以推进当地的利益和议程,这可能会导致当地的行为偏离全球预期。通过对七家跨国公司中国子公司价值转移活动的多案例研究,我们发现,价值重新诠释对价值转移结果的影响——无论是建设性的还是破坏性的——取决于作为价值发送者或接受者的子公司经理是否相互参与,以促进一个共同进化的过程,即锚定、校准和适应价值重新诠释。本研究揭示了子公司内部管理者之间的互动如何将价值重新诠释转化为知识创造的来源,使总部价值观在适应当地现实的同时,不断指导当地行为。我们的研究结果还为跨国公司如何在国际化过程中协调相互竞争的需求提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书