{"title":"Co-evolved value transfer: Managing subsidiary managers’ reinterpretation of headquarter values","authors":"Meng Zhao , Seung Ho Park , Marie K. Harder","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transferring headquarters’ (HQ) organizational values is crucial for multinational corporations (MNCs) to align subsidiary managers’ behavior with the global value system. However, subsidiary managers tend to reinterpret HQ values to advance local interests and agendas, potentially causing local behavior to deviate from global expectations. Drawing on a multiple-case study of value transfer activities in the Chinese subsidiaries of seven MNCs, we found that the impact of value reinterpretation on value transfer outcomes—whether constructive or destructive—depends on whether subsidiary managers, acting as either value senders or recipients, engage with one another to foster a <em>co-evolved</em> process of <em>anchoring, calibrating,</em> and <em>accommodating</em> value reinterpretation. This study reveals how intra-subsidiary interactions among subsidiary managers can transform value reinterpretation into a source of knowledge creation, enabling HQ values to continuously guide local behavior while adapting to local realities. Our findings also offer insights into how MNCs can reconcile competing demands in the internationalization process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 102553"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125001660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transferring headquarters’ (HQ) organizational values is crucial for multinational corporations (MNCs) to align subsidiary managers’ behavior with the global value system. However, subsidiary managers tend to reinterpret HQ values to advance local interests and agendas, potentially causing local behavior to deviate from global expectations. Drawing on a multiple-case study of value transfer activities in the Chinese subsidiaries of seven MNCs, we found that the impact of value reinterpretation on value transfer outcomes—whether constructive or destructive—depends on whether subsidiary managers, acting as either value senders or recipients, engage with one another to foster a co-evolved process of anchoring, calibrating, and accommodating value reinterpretation. This study reveals how intra-subsidiary interactions among subsidiary managers can transform value reinterpretation into a source of knowledge creation, enabling HQ values to continuously guide local behavior while adapting to local realities. Our findings also offer insights into how MNCs can reconcile competing demands in the internationalization process.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.