Education Research: Brick by NeuroBrick-A Collaborative Framework for Digital Content Creation.

Neurology. Education Pub Date : 2025-12-10 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1212/NE9.0000000000200278
Ashley Paul, Natalie Vallejo, Nana Boakye Agyeman Badu-Prempeh Badu-Prempeh, Rachel Marie E Salas, Doris G Leung, Tao Le, Tamara Kaplan
{"title":"Education Research: Brick by NeuroBrick-A Collaborative Framework for Digital Content Creation.","authors":"Ashley Paul, Natalie Vallejo, Nana Boakye Agyeman Badu-Prempeh Badu-Prempeh, Rachel Marie E Salas, Doris G Leung, Tao Le, Tamara Kaplan","doi":"10.1212/NE9.0000000000200278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Medical students increasingly rely on online resources, many of which are unvetted or behind paywalls, creating variability in quality and access. To address this, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (JHUSOM) and Harvard Medical School (HMS) developed NeuroBricks-peer-reviewed, case-based neurology modules designed to strengthen clinical reasoning and decision making. This study evaluated their feasibility, effectiveness, and scalability by examining student satisfaction and perceived educational impact across 2 institutions with different curricular structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective feasibility and evaluation study of the NeuroBricks Library, analyzing anonymous survey data from medical students at JHUSOM and HMS collected between January 2023 and June 2025. At JHUSOM, NeuroBricks were required during the neurology clerkship; at HMS, they were offered as optional resources. Surveys assessed satisfaction, perceived improvements in clinical skills, and preferred learning modalities. Five pilot NeuroBricks were initially released, expanding to 13 by November 2024. Likert scale responses were analyzed descriptively, and open-ended comments underwent thematic analysis. We also collected informal feedback on participant perceptions of the NeuroBrick creation process, along with anonymized platform analytics on global reach and usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 343 medical students participated. At JHUSOM, mean satisfaction ratings for the 5 pilot NeuroBricks ranged from 4.08 to 4.11 (5-point scale). Among 71 students evaluating the complete 13-module library, most reported improved recognition of neurologic symptoms (54 [76.1%]), interpretation of abnormal findings (48 [67.6%]), and preparedness for patient encounters (52 [73.2%]). Most preferred asynchronous learning (49 [69%]) and rated interactive features as engaging (48 [67.6%]). At HMS, 85% (17/20) were likely to recommend NeuroBricks, with thematic analysis revealing increased confidence, targeted learning, and supplemental value for shelf examination preparation. Module developers reported positive perceptions of the creation process, and analytics demonstrated global reach across 34 countries.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The multi-tiered mentorship model successfully supported the creation of the NeuroBricks Library while students demonstrated strong satisfaction with its content and perceived impact. Required integration into clerkships promoted greater engagement than optional use. By providing peer-reviewed, clinically focused modules, this scalable, open-access approach helps overcome key barriers in neurology education and can be extended to other specialties, particularly where faculty or resources are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":520085,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Education","volume":"4 4","pages":"e200278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12710498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NE9.0000000000200278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Medical students increasingly rely on online resources, many of which are unvetted or behind paywalls, creating variability in quality and access. To address this, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (JHUSOM) and Harvard Medical School (HMS) developed NeuroBricks-peer-reviewed, case-based neurology modules designed to strengthen clinical reasoning and decision making. This study evaluated their feasibility, effectiveness, and scalability by examining student satisfaction and perceived educational impact across 2 institutions with different curricular structures.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective feasibility and evaluation study of the NeuroBricks Library, analyzing anonymous survey data from medical students at JHUSOM and HMS collected between January 2023 and June 2025. At JHUSOM, NeuroBricks were required during the neurology clerkship; at HMS, they were offered as optional resources. Surveys assessed satisfaction, perceived improvements in clinical skills, and preferred learning modalities. Five pilot NeuroBricks were initially released, expanding to 13 by November 2024. Likert scale responses were analyzed descriptively, and open-ended comments underwent thematic analysis. We also collected informal feedback on participant perceptions of the NeuroBrick creation process, along with anonymized platform analytics on global reach and usage.

Results: A total of 343 medical students participated. At JHUSOM, mean satisfaction ratings for the 5 pilot NeuroBricks ranged from 4.08 to 4.11 (5-point scale). Among 71 students evaluating the complete 13-module library, most reported improved recognition of neurologic symptoms (54 [76.1%]), interpretation of abnormal findings (48 [67.6%]), and preparedness for patient encounters (52 [73.2%]). Most preferred asynchronous learning (49 [69%]) and rated interactive features as engaging (48 [67.6%]). At HMS, 85% (17/20) were likely to recommend NeuroBricks, with thematic analysis revealing increased confidence, targeted learning, and supplemental value for shelf examination preparation. Module developers reported positive perceptions of the creation process, and analytics demonstrated global reach across 34 countries.

Discussion: The multi-tiered mentorship model successfully supported the creation of the NeuroBricks Library while students demonstrated strong satisfaction with its content and perceived impact. Required integration into clerkships promoted greater engagement than optional use. By providing peer-reviewed, clinically focused modules, this scalable, open-access approach helps overcome key barriers in neurology education and can be extended to other specialties, particularly where faculty or resources are limited.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

教育研究:由neurobrick组成的砖块——数字内容创作的协作框架。
背景和目的:医学生越来越依赖在线资源,其中许多是未经审查或收费的,造成质量和访问的变化。为了解决这个问题,约翰霍普金斯大学医学院(JHUSOM)和哈佛医学院(HMS)开发了neurobricks——同行评审的、基于病例的神经学模块,旨在加强临床推理和决策。本研究通过考察两所学校不同课程结构的学生满意度和感知教育影响来评估其可行性、有效性和可扩展性。方法:对2023年1月至2025年6月期间JHUSOM和HMS医学院学生的匿名调查数据进行回顾性可行性和评估研究。在JHUSOM,神经学实习期间需要使用NeuroBricks;在HMS,它们被作为可选资源提供。调查评估了满意度、临床技能的改善和首选的学习方式。最初发布了5个试点NeuroBricks,到2024年11月将扩展到13个。李克特量表反应进行描述性分析,开放式评论进行专题分析。我们还收集了参与者对NeuroBrick创作过程的看法的非正式反馈,以及关于全球影响力和使用情况的匿名平台分析。结果:共有343名医学生参与。在JHUSOM, 5个试点NeuroBricks的平均满意度评分从4.08到4.11(5分制)。在71名评估完整的13个模块库的学生中,大多数报告改善了对神经系统症状的识别(54名[76.1%]),对异常发现的解释(48名[67.6%]),以及对患者接触的准备(52名[73.2%])。大多数人更喜欢异步学习(49人[69%]),并认为互动功能很吸引人(48人[67.6%])。在HMS中,85%(17/20)的人可能会推荐NeuroBricks,主题分析显示信心增强,有针对性的学习和货架考试准备的补充价值。模块开发者报告了对创建过程的积极看法,分析显示其在34个国家的全球影响力。讨论:多层指导模式成功地支持了NeuroBricks图书馆的创建,而学生们对其内容和感知到的影响表现出强烈的满意度。与可选的使用相比,必须集成到职员制度中促进了更大的参与。通过提供同行评议的、以临床为重点的模块,这种可扩展的、开放的方法有助于克服神经学教育中的关键障碍,并可以扩展到其他专业,特别是在师资或资源有限的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书