Perceptions of endometriosis surgery on TikTok: quality and implications for patient counselling.

IF 1.5 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn Pub Date : 2025-12-22 Epub Date: 2025-12-19 DOI:10.52054/FVVO.2025.198
Jaya Prakash, Amber T Lalla, Andrea Pelletier, Golnaz Namazi
{"title":"Perceptions of endometriosis surgery on TikTok: quality and implications for patient counselling.","authors":"Jaya Prakash, Amber T Lalla, Andrea Pelletier, Golnaz Namazi","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.2025.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>TikTok is a popular platform for sharing health experiences, including those related to endometriosis. However, the quality and tone of the surgical information shared remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterise TikTok content regarding perceptions of surgical management for endometriosis and analyse content for information quality and differences between healthcare professionals and patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of the top 100 most-viewed TikTok videos under the search term \"endometriosis surgery\" was conducted on September 22, 2024. Videos were included if in English, referenced \"endometriosis,\" and mentioned \"surgery,\" \"operation,\" or \"laparoscopy.\" Two independent reviewers assessed creator identity, tone, and content. The brief DISCERN tool evaluated information quality.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes included the perceived benefits and drawbacks of surgery, tone towards surgical intervention, and thematic content. Secondary outcomes included DISCERN scores and comparison of content across creator identities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the included videos (2021-2024), 80% were created by patients. Most conveyed a neutral tone (41%) towards surgery. Perceived benefits included therapeutic effects (68%) and diagnostic clarity (61%). Reported drawbacks were postoperative recovery (58%) and symptom persistence (22%). Common themes among patients included barriers to surgery (35%), medical gaslighting (30%), delayed diagnosis/misdiagnosis (25%), and inadequate presurgical counselling (20%). Median DISCERN scores were significantly lower for patient videos (1.00) vs. healthcare professionals (1.96; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TikTok content on endometriosis surgery is largely driven by patient narratives that highlight both hope and frustration. The low quality of information underscores the need for accessible, evidence-based educational content. Our findings represent a cross-sectional snapshot subject to algorithmic ranking and platform dynamics.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>This is the first study to systematically evaluate TikTok content focused on surgical management of endometriosis, demonstrating that patient-generated videos overwhelmingly drive the conversation. While patients frequently describe benefits such as diagnostic clarity and symptom relief, they also highlight barriers to surgery, postoperative challenges, recurrent symptoms, and experiences of medical gaslighting. Patient-created videos had significantly lower information quality than provider-generated content, underscoring a critical gap in evidence-based surgical education on social media and an opportunity for clinician engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":" ","pages":"349-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12721461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.2025.198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: TikTok is a popular platform for sharing health experiences, including those related to endometriosis. However, the quality and tone of the surgical information shared remain unclear.

Objectives: To characterise TikTok content regarding perceptions of surgical management for endometriosis and analyse content for information quality and differences between healthcare professionals and patients.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the top 100 most-viewed TikTok videos under the search term "endometriosis surgery" was conducted on September 22, 2024. Videos were included if in English, referenced "endometriosis," and mentioned "surgery," "operation," or "laparoscopy." Two independent reviewers assessed creator identity, tone, and content. The brief DISCERN tool evaluated information quality.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes included the perceived benefits and drawbacks of surgery, tone towards surgical intervention, and thematic content. Secondary outcomes included DISCERN scores and comparison of content across creator identities.

Results: Of the included videos (2021-2024), 80% were created by patients. Most conveyed a neutral tone (41%) towards surgery. Perceived benefits included therapeutic effects (68%) and diagnostic clarity (61%). Reported drawbacks were postoperative recovery (58%) and symptom persistence (22%). Common themes among patients included barriers to surgery (35%), medical gaslighting (30%), delayed diagnosis/misdiagnosis (25%), and inadequate presurgical counselling (20%). Median DISCERN scores were significantly lower for patient videos (1.00) vs. healthcare professionals (1.96; P<0.001).

Conclusions: TikTok content on endometriosis surgery is largely driven by patient narratives that highlight both hope and frustration. The low quality of information underscores the need for accessible, evidence-based educational content. Our findings represent a cross-sectional snapshot subject to algorithmic ranking and platform dynamics.

What is new?: This is the first study to systematically evaluate TikTok content focused on surgical management of endometriosis, demonstrating that patient-generated videos overwhelmingly drive the conversation. While patients frequently describe benefits such as diagnostic clarity and symptom relief, they also highlight barriers to surgery, postoperative challenges, recurrent symptoms, and experiences of medical gaslighting. Patient-created videos had significantly lower information quality than provider-generated content, underscoring a critical gap in evidence-based surgical education on social media and an opportunity for clinician engagement.

TikTok上对子宫内膜异位症手术的看法:质量和对患者咨询的影响。
背景:TikTok是一个分享健康经验的热门平台,包括与子宫内膜异位症相关的经验。然而,所分享的手术信息的质量和语气仍不清楚。目的:描述TikTok内容对子宫内膜异位症手术治疗的看法,并分析内容的信息质量以及医疗保健专业人员和患者之间的差异。方法:对2024年9月22日搜索“子宫内膜异位症手术”的前100个观看量最高的TikTok视频进行横断面分析。视频包含英文版本,提到了“子宫内膜异位症”,并提到了“手术”、“手术”或“腹腔镜检查”。两名独立评审员评估了创作者的身份、语气和内容。简要的DISCERN工具评估信息质量。主要结局指标:主要结局包括手术的利弊、对手术干预的态度和主题内容。次要结果包括辨别分数和创作者身份之间的内容比较。结果:在纳入的视频(2021-2024)中,80%由患者制作。大多数人(41%)对手术持中立态度。感知的益处包括治疗效果(68%)和诊断清晰度(61%)。报告的缺点是术后恢复(58%)和症状持续(22%)。患者中常见的主题包括手术障碍(35%)、医疗煤气灯(30%)、延迟诊断/误诊(25%)和术前咨询不足(20%)。患者视频的中位数(1.00)明显低于医疗专业人员(1.96)。结论:TikTok关于子宫内膜异位症手术的内容在很大程度上是由强调希望和沮丧的患者叙述驱动的。信息的低质量突出表明需要提供可获取的、以证据为基础的教育内容。我们的研究结果代表了受算法排名和平台动态影响的横截面快照。有什么新鲜事吗?这是第一个系统评估TikTok内容的研究,重点是子宫内膜异位症的手术治疗,表明患者制作的视频在很大程度上推动了对话。虽然患者经常描述诸如诊断清晰度和症状缓解等益处,但他们也强调了手术障碍、术后挑战、复发症状和医疗煤气灯的经历。患者制作的视频的信息质量明显低于提供者生成的内容,这突显了社交媒体上循证外科教育的严重差距,以及临床医生参与的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书