{"title":"Gastrointestinal risk profile of tigecycline, omadacycline and eravacycline: Evidence from the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Zhu Wang, Guoping Gan, Haiping Yao","doi":"10.2478/acph-2026-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the gastrointestinal (GI) safety profiles of tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline through a retrospective disproportionality analysis of reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between the second quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2024. Among 3,261 adverse event reports associated with these agents, 809 (24.8 %) involved gastrointestinal disorders, with tigecycline accounting for the largest proportion (588 reports), followed by omadacycline (197) and eravacycline (24). Disproportionality analysis revealed that gastrointestinal disorders ranked among the top three system organ classes for all three drugs, with positive signals observed for tigecycline (ROR = 1.63), omadacycline (ROR = 3.04), and eravacycline (ROR = 1.79), the strongest association being with omadacycline. While most GI events were consistent with known safety information, several unexpected signals were identified, including gastrointestinal haemorrhage, melena, small-intestinal obstruction, tongue discolouration, and intestinal perforation for tigecycline, as well as lip swelling and tongue discolouration for omadacycline. The median onset times of GI events were 4, 0, and 2.5 days for tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline, respectively, with nearly half of the events occurring within three days of treatment initiation. These findings reveal distinct GI safety patterns among newer tetracycline-derived antibiotics and underscore the importance of early and route-specific monitoring in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7034,"journal":{"name":"Acta Pharmaceutica","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Pharmaceutica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acph-2026-0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assessed the gastrointestinal (GI) safety profiles of tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline through a retrospective disproportionality analysis of reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between the second quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2024. Among 3,261 adverse event reports associated with these agents, 809 (24.8 %) involved gastrointestinal disorders, with tigecycline accounting for the largest proportion (588 reports), followed by omadacycline (197) and eravacycline (24). Disproportionality analysis revealed that gastrointestinal disorders ranked among the top three system organ classes for all three drugs, with positive signals observed for tigecycline (ROR = 1.63), omadacycline (ROR = 3.04), and eravacycline (ROR = 1.79), the strongest association being with omadacycline. While most GI events were consistent with known safety information, several unexpected signals were identified, including gastrointestinal haemorrhage, melena, small-intestinal obstruction, tongue discolouration, and intestinal perforation for tigecycline, as well as lip swelling and tongue discolouration for omadacycline. The median onset times of GI events were 4, 0, and 2.5 days for tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline, respectively, with nearly half of the events occurring within three days of treatment initiation. These findings reveal distinct GI safety patterns among newer tetracycline-derived antibiotics and underscore the importance of early and route-specific monitoring in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
AP is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to pharmaceutical and allied sciences and contains articles predominantly on core biomedical and health subjects. The aim of AP is to increase the impact of pharmaceutical research in academia, industry and laboratories. With strong emphasis on quality and originality, AP publishes reports from the discovery of a drug up to clinical practice. Topics covered are: analytics, biochemistry, biopharmaceutics, biotechnology, cell biology, cell cultures, clinical pharmacy, drug design, drug delivery, drug disposition, drug stability, gene technology, medicine (including diagnostics and therapy), medicinal chemistry, metabolism, molecular modeling, pharmacology (clinical and animal), peptide and protein chemistry, pharmacognosy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, protein design, radiopharmaceuticals, and toxicology.