Gastrointestinal risk profile of tigecycline, omadacycline and eravacycline: Evidence from the FDA adverse event reporting system.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Acta Pharmaceutica Pub Date : 2026-03-25 Print Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.2478/acph-2026-0001
Zhu Wang, Guoping Gan, Haiping Yao
{"title":"Gastrointestinal risk profile of tigecycline, omadacycline and eravacycline: Evidence from the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Zhu Wang, Guoping Gan, Haiping Yao","doi":"10.2478/acph-2026-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the gastrointestinal (GI) safety profiles of tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline through a retrospective disproportionality analysis of reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between the second quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2024. Among 3,261 adverse event reports associated with these agents, 809 (24.8 %) involved gastrointestinal disorders, with tigecycline accounting for the largest proportion (588 reports), followed by omadacycline (197) and eravacycline (24). Disproportionality analysis revealed that gastrointestinal disorders ranked among the top three system organ classes for all three drugs, with positive signals observed for tigecycline (ROR = 1.63), omadacycline (ROR = 3.04), and eravacycline (ROR = 1.79), the strongest association being with omadacycline. While most GI events were consistent with known safety information, several unexpected signals were identified, including gastrointestinal haemorrhage, melena, small-intestinal obstruction, tongue discolouration, and intestinal perforation for tigecycline, as well as lip swelling and tongue discolouration for omadacycline. The median onset times of GI events were 4, 0, and 2.5 days for tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline, respectively, with nearly half of the events occurring within three days of treatment initiation. These findings reveal distinct GI safety patterns among newer tetracycline-derived antibiotics and underscore the importance of early and route-specific monitoring in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7034,"journal":{"name":"Acta Pharmaceutica","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Pharmaceutica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acph-2026-0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the gastrointestinal (GI) safety profiles of tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline through a retrospective disproportionality analysis of reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between the second quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2024. Among 3,261 adverse event reports associated with these agents, 809 (24.8 %) involved gastrointestinal disorders, with tigecycline accounting for the largest proportion (588 reports), followed by omadacycline (197) and eravacycline (24). Disproportionality analysis revealed that gastrointestinal disorders ranked among the top three system organ classes for all three drugs, with positive signals observed for tigecycline (ROR = 1.63), omadacycline (ROR = 3.04), and eravacycline (ROR = 1.79), the strongest association being with omadacycline. While most GI events were consistent with known safety information, several unexpected signals were identified, including gastrointestinal haemorrhage, melena, small-intestinal obstruction, tongue discolouration, and intestinal perforation for tigecycline, as well as lip swelling and tongue discolouration for omadacycline. The median onset times of GI events were 4, 0, and 2.5 days for tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline, respectively, with nearly half of the events occurring within three days of treatment initiation. These findings reveal distinct GI safety patterns among newer tetracycline-derived antibiotics and underscore the importance of early and route-specific monitoring in clinical practice.

替加环素、奥马达环素和依瓦环素的胃肠道风险概况:来自FDA不良事件报告系统的证据
本研究通过对2005年第二季度至2024年第一季度提交给FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的报告进行回顾性歧化分析,评估了替加环素、奥马达环素和依瓦环素的胃肠道(GI)安全性。在与这些药物相关的3261例不良事件报告中,809例(24.8%)涉及胃肠道疾病,其中替加环素所占比例最大(588例),其次是奥马达环素(197例)和依拉瓦环素(24例)。歧化分析显示,胃肠道疾病在三种药物的系统器官类别中均排在前三位,替加环素(ROR = 1.63)、奥马达环素(ROR = 3.04)和依拉瓦环素(ROR = 1.79)均有阳性信号,其中与奥马达环素的相关性最强。虽然大多数胃肠道事件与已知的安全性信息一致,但也发现了一些意想不到的信号,包括替加环素引起的胃肠道出血、黑黑、小肠梗阻、舌头变色和肠道穿孔,以及奥马达环素引起的嘴唇肿胀和舌头变色。替加环素、奥马达环素和依拉瓦环素的GI事件的中位发病时间分别为4、0和2.5天,其中近一半的事件发生在治疗开始的3天内。这些发现揭示了新型四环素衍生抗生素中不同的胃肠道安全模式,并强调了在临床实践中早期和特定途径监测的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Pharmaceutica
Acta Pharmaceutica PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AP is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to pharmaceutical and allied sciences and contains articles predominantly on core biomedical and health subjects. The aim of AP is to increase the impact of pharmaceutical research in academia, industry and laboratories. With strong emphasis on quality and originality, AP publishes reports from the discovery of a drug up to clinical practice. Topics covered are: analytics, biochemistry, biopharmaceutics, biotechnology, cell biology, cell cultures, clinical pharmacy, drug design, drug delivery, drug disposition, drug stability, gene technology, medicine (including diagnostics and therapy), medicinal chemistry, metabolism, molecular modeling, pharmacology (clinical and animal), peptide and protein chemistry, pharmacognosy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, protein design, radiopharmaceuticals, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书