Applications of Machine Learning Algorithms in Dementia Classification Using Eight Clinical Diagnostic Measures

IF 1.1 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
Natacha Usanase, Abdullahi G. Usman, Dilber Uzun Ozsahin
{"title":"Applications of Machine Learning Algorithms in Dementia Classification Using Eight Clinical Diagnostic Measures","authors":"Natacha Usanase,&nbsp;Abdullahi G. Usman,&nbsp;Dilber Uzun Ozsahin","doi":"10.1007/s12126-025-09643-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Computer-aided applications are currently on the rise, particularly in time-sensitive and highly accurate applications such as healthcare. The rate by which dementia cases have been significantly increasing despite clinical reports and psychometric tests being utilized by clinicians to diagnose it illustrates a health challenge and global concern about the techniques being used in the Global medical analysis of the condition. Therefore, with the help of machine learning (ML) algorithms, the aim of this study is to classify patients with dementia using various clinical parameters to help in quick and highly accurate diagnosis. Seven ML models: logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, gradient boosting, voting classifier and stacking classifier, were evaluated using several performance metrics to enhance the efficiency of dementia diagnosis. Interpretation of the model results was based on an explainable algorithm: SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). All classifiers achieved high accuracy in categorising the dementia dataset where random forest, logistic regression and voting classifier achieved high accuracy (92%), high precision (98%), high recall (87% to 88%), high F1-score (92% to 93%) and high AUC (95%) which indicating the classifiers reliability in reducing false positive and false negative dementia cases. The used approach achieves more robustness and easy interpretability compared to other techniques applied in literature through the application of multiple ML techniques, a thorough cross-validation [The ensemble model had statistical significant difference when compared to the single model (AUC: 0.972 vs 0.924, p&lt;0.05), but not with other ensemble models (AUC: 0.972 vs 0.966, p=0.55)], and SHAP analysis. The applied methodology can be used to facilitate the early detection of dementia, enable early treatment interventions, and SHAP-based interpretability can help increase transparency during this decision-making process, thereby increasing their integration into hospital operations. Such an approach can help neurologists and radiologists to effectively screen patients and prioritize further evaluations, which will ultimately lead to a minimization of diagnostic delays.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51665,"journal":{"name":"Ageing International","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-025-09643-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computer-aided applications are currently on the rise, particularly in time-sensitive and highly accurate applications such as healthcare. The rate by which dementia cases have been significantly increasing despite clinical reports and psychometric tests being utilized by clinicians to diagnose it illustrates a health challenge and global concern about the techniques being used in the Global medical analysis of the condition. Therefore, with the help of machine learning (ML) algorithms, the aim of this study is to classify patients with dementia using various clinical parameters to help in quick and highly accurate diagnosis. Seven ML models: logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, gradient boosting, voting classifier and stacking classifier, were evaluated using several performance metrics to enhance the efficiency of dementia diagnosis. Interpretation of the model results was based on an explainable algorithm: SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). All classifiers achieved high accuracy in categorising the dementia dataset where random forest, logistic regression and voting classifier achieved high accuracy (92%), high precision (98%), high recall (87% to 88%), high F1-score (92% to 93%) and high AUC (95%) which indicating the classifiers reliability in reducing false positive and false negative dementia cases. The used approach achieves more robustness and easy interpretability compared to other techniques applied in literature through the application of multiple ML techniques, a thorough cross-validation [The ensemble model had statistical significant difference when compared to the single model (AUC: 0.972 vs 0.924, p<0.05), but not with other ensemble models (AUC: 0.972 vs 0.966, p=0.55)], and SHAP analysis. The applied methodology can be used to facilitate the early detection of dementia, enable early treatment interventions, and SHAP-based interpretability can help increase transparency during this decision-making process, thereby increasing their integration into hospital operations. Such an approach can help neurologists and radiologists to effectively screen patients and prioritize further evaluations, which will ultimately lead to a minimization of diagnostic delays.

机器学习算法在痴呆分类中的应用
计算机辅助应用程序目前正在上升,特别是在时间敏感和高度精确的应用程序,如医疗保健。尽管临床医生正在使用临床报告和心理测量测试来诊断痴呆症,但痴呆症病例的发生率仍在显著增加,这说明了一项健康挑战和全球对全球医学分析中使用的技术的关注。因此,在机器学习(ML)算法的帮助下,本研究的目的是利用各种临床参数对痴呆症患者进行分类,以帮助快速和高度准确的诊断。采用多个性能指标对逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林、支持向量机、梯度增强、投票分类器和堆叠分类器等7种机器学习模型进行评价,以提高痴呆诊断效率。模型结果的解释基于一种可解释算法:SHapley加性解释(SHAP)。所有分类器在对痴呆数据集进行分类时都达到了很高的准确性,其中随机森林、逻辑回归和投票分类器达到了高精度(92%)、高精度(98%)、高召回率(87%至88%)、高一级分数(92%至93%)和高AUC(95%),这表明分类器在减少假阳性和假阴性痴呆病例方面的可靠性。与文献中使用的其他技术相比,该方法通过应用多种ML技术,彻底的交叉验证[集成模型与单一模型相比具有统计学显著差异(AUC: 0.972 vs 0.924, p<0.05),但与其他集成模型相比没有统计学差异(AUC: 0.972 vs 0.966, p=0.55)],以及SHAP分析,具有更强的鲁棒性和易于解释性。应用的方法可用于促进痴呆症的早期发现,使早期治疗干预成为可能,基于shap的可解释性可以帮助提高决策过程中的透明度,从而增加其与医院业务的整合。这种方法可以帮助神经科医生和放射科医生有效地筛查患者,并优先考虑进一步的评估,最终将诊断延误降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ageing International
Ageing International GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: As a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that has existed for over three decades, Ageing International serves all professionals who deal with complex ageing issues. The journal is dedicated to improving the life of ageing populations worldwide through providing an intellectual forum for communicating common concerns, exchanging analyses and discoveries in scientific research, crystallizing significant issues, and offering recommendations in ageing-related service delivery and policy making. Besides encouraging the submission of high-quality research and review papers, Ageing International seeks to bring together researchers, policy analysts, and service program administrators who are committed to reducing the ''implementation gap'' between good science and effective service, between evidence-based protocol and culturally suitable programs, and between unique innovative solutions and generalizable policies. For significant issues that are common across countries, Ageing International will organize special forums for scholars and investigators from different disciplines to present their regional perspectives as well as to provide more comprehensive analysis. The editors strongly believe that such discourse has the potential to foster a wide range of coordinated efforts that will lead to improvements in the quality of life of older persons worldwide. Abstracted and Indexed in: ABI/INFORM, Academic OneFile, Academic Search, CSA/Proquest, Current Abstracts, EBSCO, Ergonomics Abstracts, Expanded Academic, Gale, Google Scholar, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, PsychINFO, PsyARTICLES, SCOPUS, Social Science Abstracts, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书