Finding Reproducible and Prognostic Radiomic Features in Variable Slice Thickness Contrast Enhanced CT of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Jacob J Peoples, Mohammad Hamghalam, Imani James, Maida Wasim, Natalie Gangai, Hyunseon Christine Kang, X John Rong, Yun Shin Chun, Richard K G Do, Amber L Simpson
{"title":"Finding Reproducible and Prognostic Radiomic Features in Variable Slice Thickness Contrast Enhanced CT of Colorectal Liver Metastases.","authors":"Jacob J Peoples, Mohammad Hamghalam, Imani James, Maida Wasim, Natalie Gangai, Hyunseon Christine Kang, X John Rong, Yun Shin Chun, Richard K G Do, Amber L Simpson","doi":"10.59275/j.melba.2024-24gc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Establishing the reproducibility of radiomic signatures is a critical step in the path to clinical adoption of quantitative imaging biomarkers; however, radiomic signatures must also be meaningfully related to an outcome of clinical importance to be of value for personalized medicine. In this study, we analyze both the reproducibility and prognostic value of radiomic features extracted from the liver parenchyma and largest liver metastases in contrast enhanced CT scans of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). A prospective cohort of 81 patients from two major US cancer centers was used to establish the reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from images reconstructed with different slice thicknesses. A publicly available, single-center cohort of 197 preoperative scans from patients who underwent hepatic resection for treatment of CRLM was used to evaluate the prognostic value of features and models to predict overall survival. A standard set of 93 features was extracted from all images, with a set of eight different extractor settings. The feature extraction settings producing the most reproducible, as well as the most prognostically discriminative feature values were highly dependent on both the region of interest and the specific feature in question. While the best overall predictive model was produced using features extracted with a particular setting, without accounting for reproducibility, (C-index = 0.630 (0.603-0.649)) an equivalent-performing model (C-index = 0.629 (0.605-0.645)) was produced by pooling features from all extraction settings, and thresholding features with low reproducibility (CCC ≥ 0.85), prior to feature selection. Our findings support a data-driven approach to feature extraction and selection, preferring the inclusion of many features, and narrowing feature selection based on reproducibility when relevant data is available.</p>","PeriodicalId":75083,"journal":{"name":"The journal of machine learning for biomedical imaging","volume":"2 UNSURE2023","pages":"2326-2357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12700627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of machine learning for biomedical imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59275/j.melba.2024-24gc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Establishing the reproducibility of radiomic signatures is a critical step in the path to clinical adoption of quantitative imaging biomarkers; however, radiomic signatures must also be meaningfully related to an outcome of clinical importance to be of value for personalized medicine. In this study, we analyze both the reproducibility and prognostic value of radiomic features extracted from the liver parenchyma and largest liver metastases in contrast enhanced CT scans of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). A prospective cohort of 81 patients from two major US cancer centers was used to establish the reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from images reconstructed with different slice thicknesses. A publicly available, single-center cohort of 197 preoperative scans from patients who underwent hepatic resection for treatment of CRLM was used to evaluate the prognostic value of features and models to predict overall survival. A standard set of 93 features was extracted from all images, with a set of eight different extractor settings. The feature extraction settings producing the most reproducible, as well as the most prognostically discriminative feature values were highly dependent on both the region of interest and the specific feature in question. While the best overall predictive model was produced using features extracted with a particular setting, without accounting for reproducibility, (C-index = 0.630 (0.603-0.649)) an equivalent-performing model (C-index = 0.629 (0.605-0.645)) was produced by pooling features from all extraction settings, and thresholding features with low reproducibility (CCC ≥ 0.85), prior to feature selection. Our findings support a data-driven approach to feature extraction and selection, preferring the inclusion of many features, and narrowing feature selection based on reproducibility when relevant data is available.

寻找结直肠肝转移瘤变层增强CT的可重复性和预后放射学特征。
建立放射学特征的可重复性是定量成像生物标志物临床应用的关键一步;然而,放射学特征也必须与临床结果有意义的关联,才能对个性化医疗有价值。在这项研究中,我们分析了从结直肠肝转移(CRLM)患者的肝实质和最大肝转移瘤中提取的放射学特征的可重复性和预后价值。来自美国两家主要癌症中心的81名患者的前瞻性队列被用来建立从不同切片厚度重建的图像中提取的放射学特征的可重复性。一项公开的单中心队列研究,包括197例接受肝切除治疗的CRLM患者的术前扫描,用于评估特征和模型预测总生存期的预后价值。使用8种不同的提取器设置,从所有图像中提取出93个特征的标准集。产生最具可重复性和最具预测性的特征值的特征提取设置高度依赖于感兴趣的区域和所讨论的特定特征。虽然在不考虑再现性的情况下,使用特定设置提取的特征产生了最佳的整体预测模型(C-index = 0.630(0.603-0.649)),但在特征选择之前,通过汇集所有提取设置的特征和再现性较低的阈值特征(CCC≥0.85),产生了一个同等性能的模型(C-index = 0.629(0.605-0.645))。我们的研究结果支持数据驱动的特征提取和选择方法,倾向于包含许多特征,并在相关数据可用时根据可重复性缩小特征选择范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书