The self-reported opinions of ambulance personnel using a patient outcome feedback system in the emergency department.

Karen Chivers, Omar Touma, Victoire Vidart, Simon Bell
{"title":"The self-reported opinions of ambulance personnel using a patient outcome feedback system in the emergency department.","authors":"Karen Chivers, Omar Touma, Victoire Vidart, Simon Bell","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2025.12.10.3.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ambulance clinicians manage a wide range of complex and often challenging clinical presentations. Despite spending significant time with patients during the pre-hospital phase, they rarely receive meaningful feedback on the diagnosis, progress or outcome of their patients from the hospital. This lack of structured feedback represents a missed opportunity for learning and emotional closure. To address this gap, Wexham Park Hospital (WPH) introduced a formal patient outcome feedback service for ambulance clinicians. This mixed-methods service evaluation aimed to explore the effectiveness and impact of the feedback service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic questionnaire was distributed to all previous and present users of the feedback service. The questionnaire included 12 quantitative and qualitative items designed to explore users' experience. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis by all authors to identify key themes of the service's impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 questionnaires were completed and included in the analysis. Satisfaction with the service was very high: 98% of respondents reported being satisfied; 91% indicated that the feedback received was likely to influence their clinical practice; and 68% reported an impact on their mental well-being resulting from the feedback, assumed to be positive.Four domains of improved clinical care were identified by thematic analysis: diagnostic insight and knowledge development; clinical decision-making; confidence and professional growth; continued learning and reflection. The feedback was perceived to have a positive emotional and mental effect, providing clinicians with closure, peace of mind, reassurance and a reduction in uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The service was viewed by users to enhance clinical practice, support well-being and improve patient care. It fostered confidence in diagnostic and decision-making skills, reduced anxiety and uncertainty and encouraged self-reflection and professional growth. We recommend that feedback services be implemented at facilities where pre-hospital teams interface with hospital care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"10 3","pages":"38-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12699508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2025.12.10.3.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ambulance clinicians manage a wide range of complex and often challenging clinical presentations. Despite spending significant time with patients during the pre-hospital phase, they rarely receive meaningful feedback on the diagnosis, progress or outcome of their patients from the hospital. This lack of structured feedback represents a missed opportunity for learning and emotional closure. To address this gap, Wexham Park Hospital (WPH) introduced a formal patient outcome feedback service for ambulance clinicians. This mixed-methods service evaluation aimed to explore the effectiveness and impact of the feedback service.

Methods: An electronic questionnaire was distributed to all previous and present users of the feedback service. The questionnaire included 12 quantitative and qualitative items designed to explore users' experience. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis by all authors to identify key themes of the service's impact.

Results: A total of 101 questionnaires were completed and included in the analysis. Satisfaction with the service was very high: 98% of respondents reported being satisfied; 91% indicated that the feedback received was likely to influence their clinical practice; and 68% reported an impact on their mental well-being resulting from the feedback, assumed to be positive.Four domains of improved clinical care were identified by thematic analysis: diagnostic insight and knowledge development; clinical decision-making; confidence and professional growth; continued learning and reflection. The feedback was perceived to have a positive emotional and mental effect, providing clinicians with closure, peace of mind, reassurance and a reduction in uncertainty.

Conclusion: The service was viewed by users to enhance clinical practice, support well-being and improve patient care. It fostered confidence in diagnostic and decision-making skills, reduced anxiety and uncertainty and encouraged self-reflection and professional growth. We recommend that feedback services be implemented at facilities where pre-hospital teams interface with hospital care providers.

使用急诊科病人结果反馈系统的救护人员的自我报告意见。
简介:救护车临床医生管理范围广泛的复杂和具有挑战性的临床表现。尽管他们在住院前阶段花了大量时间与患者在一起,但他们很少从医院收到关于患者的诊断、进展或结果的有意义的反馈。缺乏结构化的反馈意味着错失了学习和情感封闭的机会。为了解决这一差距,韦克瑟姆公园医院(WPH)为救护车临床医生引入了正式的患者结果反馈服务。这种混合方法的服务评估旨在探讨反馈服务的有效性和影响。方法:采用电子问卷调查的方法,对以往和现在使用反馈服务的用户进行问卷调查。问卷包括12个定量和定性项目,旨在探索用户体验。定量数据进行了描述性分析,而所有作者对定性答复进行了专题分析,以确定该服务影响的关键主题。结果:共完成问卷101份,并纳入分析。对服务的满意度非常高:98%的受访者表示满意;91%表示收到的反馈可能会影响他们的临床实践;68%的人报告说,这些反馈对他们的心理健康产生了影响,这些反馈被认为是积极的。通过专题分析确定了改善临床护理的四个领域:诊断洞察力和知识发展;临床决策;信心和专业成长;继续学习和反思。这些反馈被认为具有积极的情绪和心理影响,为临床医生提供了封闭、安心、放心和减少不确定性。结论:用户认为该服务提高了临床实践,支持健康,改善了患者护理。它培养了对诊断和决策技能的信心,减少了焦虑和不确定性,鼓励了自我反思和专业成长。我们建议在院前小组与医院护理提供者接触的设施中实施反馈服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书