Evaluating National Circular Economy Practices in the UK: Setting a Strategic Agenda for a Nation-Wide Roadmap.

Circular economy and sustainability Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s43615-025-00669-2
Halidu Abu-Bakar, Fiona Charnley
{"title":"Evaluating National Circular Economy Practices in the UK: Setting a Strategic Agenda for a Nation-Wide Roadmap.","authors":"Halidu Abu-Bakar, Fiona Charnley","doi":"10.1007/s43615-025-00669-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research presents a comprehensive analysis of Circular Economy (CE) practices across the United Kingdom, using advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, specifically Named Entity Recognition (NER), chosen for its reproducible, large-scale extraction of locations, sectors and 9R actions from 1.2 million words of policy text. The study examines 36 key documents, comprising roadmaps, policy statements, and sectoral reports, to categorise CE activities such as recycling, reduction, reuse, and recovery. The dataset includes 22,589 distinct entries, covering 52 locations, 34 industrial sectors, and 109 stakeholder categories. Notably, recycling emerges as the most dominant activity, representing 42.8% of all practices, which suggests an over-reliance on waste management solutions rather than upstream interventions like reduction and remanufacturing. Analysis shows that Construction & Demolition (19.8%) and Food & Beverage (13.7%) account for most initiatives, while the Digital, Electronics and Aviation sectors together contribute barely 1%. Local authorities lead 18% of actions, yet trade organisations add less than 1%. Regional priorities also differ: Wales directs 46% of activity to waste management, whereas Scotland and Northern Ireland devote 44% and 53% respectively to decarbonisation and resource-efficiency measures. These disparities reveal structural asymmetries in investment and skills and therefore justify a devolved-yet-co-ordinated policy mechanism, similar to the UK Industrial Strategy Council, that can harmonise regional targets while preserving local strengths. This research offers critical insights into sectoral and geographic patterns, allowing policymakers to prioritise gaps in existing CE initiatives. Although recycling diverts material from landfill, our results indicate that this downstream concentration yields lower value-retention and slower decarbonisation than upstream actions (e.g. design-for-reuse or remanufacturing), signalling an urgent need to rebalance UK policy towards the upper tiers of the 9R hierarchy. Notably, our findings reveal a fragmented approach to CE in the UK- with regions pursuing different priorities and a heavy reliance on recycling- underscoring the need for a unified national CE roadmap. We therefore recommend the development of an integrated UK-wide CE strategy that incentivises upstream practices (e.g. reduction and reuse) and harmonises regional efforts to achieve broader circular economy goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":72595,"journal":{"name":"Circular economy and sustainability","volume":"5 6","pages":"5279-5313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12701016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circular economy and sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-025-00669-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research presents a comprehensive analysis of Circular Economy (CE) practices across the United Kingdom, using advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, specifically Named Entity Recognition (NER), chosen for its reproducible, large-scale extraction of locations, sectors and 9R actions from 1.2 million words of policy text. The study examines 36 key documents, comprising roadmaps, policy statements, and sectoral reports, to categorise CE activities such as recycling, reduction, reuse, and recovery. The dataset includes 22,589 distinct entries, covering 52 locations, 34 industrial sectors, and 109 stakeholder categories. Notably, recycling emerges as the most dominant activity, representing 42.8% of all practices, which suggests an over-reliance on waste management solutions rather than upstream interventions like reduction and remanufacturing. Analysis shows that Construction & Demolition (19.8%) and Food & Beverage (13.7%) account for most initiatives, while the Digital, Electronics and Aviation sectors together contribute barely 1%. Local authorities lead 18% of actions, yet trade organisations add less than 1%. Regional priorities also differ: Wales directs 46% of activity to waste management, whereas Scotland and Northern Ireland devote 44% and 53% respectively to decarbonisation and resource-efficiency measures. These disparities reveal structural asymmetries in investment and skills and therefore justify a devolved-yet-co-ordinated policy mechanism, similar to the UK Industrial Strategy Council, that can harmonise regional targets while preserving local strengths. This research offers critical insights into sectoral and geographic patterns, allowing policymakers to prioritise gaps in existing CE initiatives. Although recycling diverts material from landfill, our results indicate that this downstream concentration yields lower value-retention and slower decarbonisation than upstream actions (e.g. design-for-reuse or remanufacturing), signalling an urgent need to rebalance UK policy towards the upper tiers of the 9R hierarchy. Notably, our findings reveal a fragmented approach to CE in the UK- with regions pursuing different priorities and a heavy reliance on recycling- underscoring the need for a unified national CE roadmap. We therefore recommend the development of an integrated UK-wide CE strategy that incentivises upstream practices (e.g. reduction and reuse) and harmonises regional efforts to achieve broader circular economy goals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估英国国家循环经济实践:为全国路线图制定战略议程。
本研究采用先进的自然语言处理(NLP)技术,特别是命名实体识别(NER)技术,对英国各地的循环经济(CE)实践进行了全面分析,因为它从120万字的政策文本中可重复、大规模地提取了地点、部门和9R行动。该研究审查了36份主要文件,包括路线图、政策声明和部门报告,以分类环境行政活动,如回收、减少、再利用和回收。该数据集包括22,589个不同的条目,涵盖52个地区,34个工业部门和109个利益相关者类别。值得注意的是,回收是最主要的活动,占所有实践的42.8%,这表明过度依赖废物管理解决方案,而不是减少和再制造等上游干预措施。分析显示,建筑与拆除(19.8%)和食品与饮料(13.7%)占了大部分,而数字、电子和航空领域的贡献加起来仅为1%。地方政府领导了18%的行动,而贸易组织只占不到1%。地区优先事项也有所不同:威尔士将46%的活动用于废物管理,而苏格兰和北爱尔兰分别将44%和53%的活动用于脱碳和资源效率措施。这些差异揭示了投资和技能方面的结构性不对称,因此有理由建立一种分权但协调的政策机制,类似于英国工业战略委员会(UK Industrial Strategy Council),在保持地方优势的同时协调地区目标。这项研究提供了对部门和地理模式的关键见解,使政策制定者能够优先考虑现有环境保护计划中的差距。虽然回收利用转移了垃圾填埋场的材料,但我们的研究结果表明,与上游行动(如设计再利用或再制造)相比,这种下游浓度产生的价值保留率较低,脱碳速度较慢,这表明迫切需要重新平衡英国政策,使其朝着9R层次结构的上层发展。值得注意的是,我们的研究结果揭示了英国的一种支离破碎的方法——各地区追求不同的优先事项和对回收的严重依赖——强调了统一的国家CE路线图的必要性。因此,我们建议制定一项全英国范围内的综合能源战略,以激励上游实践(例如减少和再利用),并协调区域努力实现更广泛的循环经济目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书