{"title":"Effects of Schanz screw location on reduction efficiency in distal femur fractures: A finite element analysis.","authors":"Shou-I Chen, Wei-Sheng Hong, Chia-Che Lee, Hung-Kuan Yen, Tzu-Hao Tseng, Shau-Huai Fu","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2026.2575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical efficiency of different Schanz screw positions for indirect reduction of distal femur fractures using finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A three-dimensional finite element model of a comminuted distal femur fracture was constructed, incorporating relevant anatomical structures including ligaments, menisci, and the gastrocnemius muscle. A 30 N posterior force simulated gastrocnemius-induced deformity, followed by a 15 N horizontal traction force applied through Schanz screws inserted at six positions (hole 1 to 6) on a standard distal femur locking plate. Residual displacement and reduction ratios were measured to assess reduction efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model successfully replicated the characteristic posterior displacement (~15 mm) caused by gastrocnemius contraction. Among the six pin positions, hole 6 (most anterior and distal position) achieved the greatest reduction (12.90 mm) with an 86.83% correction ratio, while hole 4 (most posterior and distal position) performed the worst (26.88%). More anterior and distal pin locations provided superior reduction outcomes due to improved mechanical advantage and alignment with the deforming force vector.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Schanz screw placement significantly influences the effectiveness of traction-assisted reduction in distal femur fractures. Hole position 6 yielded the most optimal biomechanical performance and may serve as a practical reference for optimizing intraoperative pin placement, potentially improving surgical efficiency and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"37 1","pages":"88-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12788759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2026.2575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical efficiency of different Schanz screw positions for indirect reduction of distal femur fractures using finite element analysis.
Materials and methods: A three-dimensional finite element model of a comminuted distal femur fracture was constructed, incorporating relevant anatomical structures including ligaments, menisci, and the gastrocnemius muscle. A 30 N posterior force simulated gastrocnemius-induced deformity, followed by a 15 N horizontal traction force applied through Schanz screws inserted at six positions (hole 1 to 6) on a standard distal femur locking plate. Residual displacement and reduction ratios were measured to assess reduction efficiency.
Results: The model successfully replicated the characteristic posterior displacement (~15 mm) caused by gastrocnemius contraction. Among the six pin positions, hole 6 (most anterior and distal position) achieved the greatest reduction (12.90 mm) with an 86.83% correction ratio, while hole 4 (most posterior and distal position) performed the worst (26.88%). More anterior and distal pin locations provided superior reduction outcomes due to improved mechanical advantage and alignment with the deforming force vector.
Conclusion: Schanz screw placement significantly influences the effectiveness of traction-assisted reduction in distal femur fractures. Hole position 6 yielded the most optimal biomechanical performance and may serve as a practical reference for optimizing intraoperative pin placement, potentially improving surgical efficiency and outcomes.