Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip: A meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Joint diseases and related surgery Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-23 DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2026.2408
Hao-Tian Yin, Yi-Xiang Zhang, Tao Yang, Xin Fu, Lei Wang, Jun Liu
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Hao-Tian Yin, Yi-Xiang Zhang, Tao Yang, Xin Fu, Lei Wang, Jun Liu","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2026.2408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) versus conventional total hip arthroplasty (C-THA) for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eligible articles published until May 2025 were searched from the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Springer. Search terms included \"robot-assisted\", \"developmental dysplasia of the hip\", \"total hip arthroplasty\", using mean differences (MDs) and risk differences (RDs) as combined variables, and selecting 95% as the confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven clinical studies with a total of 876 patients were finally included in this study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of cup inclination (MD=0.07; 95% CI: -0.95 ~ 1.10; p=0.89), cup anteversion (MD=-4.02; 95% CI: -9.59 ~ 1.55; p=0.16), intraoperative bleeding (MD=11.25; 95% CI: -56.02 ~ 78.52; p=0.74), operative time (MD=3.03; 95% CI: -15.66 ~ 21.72; p=0.75), postoperative complications (dislocation [RD=-0.01; 95% CI: -0.03 ~ 0.01; p=0.26], deep infection [RD=0.01; 95% CI: -0.01 ~ 0.02; p=0.37] and nerve injury [RD=0.01; 95% CI: -0.01 ~ 0.03; p=0.56], revision/reoperation [RD=-0.00; 95% CI: -0.03 ~ 0.03; p=1.00], and absolute vertical distance of center of rotation [COR] [MD=-0.50; 95% CI: -1.07 ~ 0.06; p=0.08]). However, compared to the C-THA group, the R-THA group showed significantly higher Harris Hip Score (HHS) (MD=2.17, 95% CI: 0.11 ~ 4.22, p=0.04) and more accurate placement of the horizontal COR (MD=-0.77; 95% CI: -1.21 ~ -0.32; p=0.0008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the R-THA group, the accuracy of horizontal placement of the COR was moderately improved, and the postoperative HHS was higher than that in the C-THA group, although such differences might not be obviously perceived by patients. Additionally, no significant differences were found between the two groups in other surgery-related parameters and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"37 1","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12788775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2026.2408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) versus conventional total hip arthroplasty (C-THA) for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Materials and methods: Eligible articles published until May 2025 were searched from the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Springer. Search terms included "robot-assisted", "developmental dysplasia of the hip", "total hip arthroplasty", using mean differences (MDs) and risk differences (RDs) as combined variables, and selecting 95% as the confidence interval (CI).

Results: Seven clinical studies with a total of 876 patients were finally included in this study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of cup inclination (MD=0.07; 95% CI: -0.95 ~ 1.10; p=0.89), cup anteversion (MD=-4.02; 95% CI: -9.59 ~ 1.55; p=0.16), intraoperative bleeding (MD=11.25; 95% CI: -56.02 ~ 78.52; p=0.74), operative time (MD=3.03; 95% CI: -15.66 ~ 21.72; p=0.75), postoperative complications (dislocation [RD=-0.01; 95% CI: -0.03 ~ 0.01; p=0.26], deep infection [RD=0.01; 95% CI: -0.01 ~ 0.02; p=0.37] and nerve injury [RD=0.01; 95% CI: -0.01 ~ 0.03; p=0.56], revision/reoperation [RD=-0.00; 95% CI: -0.03 ~ 0.03; p=1.00], and absolute vertical distance of center of rotation [COR] [MD=-0.50; 95% CI: -1.07 ~ 0.06; p=0.08]). However, compared to the C-THA group, the R-THA group showed significantly higher Harris Hip Score (HHS) (MD=2.17, 95% CI: 0.11 ~ 4.22, p=0.04) and more accurate placement of the horizontal COR (MD=-0.77; 95% CI: -1.21 ~ -0.32; p=0.0008).

Conclusion: In the R-THA group, the accuracy of horizontal placement of the COR was moderately improved, and the postoperative HHS was higher than that in the C-THA group, although such differences might not be obviously perceived by patients. Additionally, no significant differences were found between the two groups in other surgery-related parameters and safety.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器人辅助全髋关节置换术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良的临床疗效:荟萃分析。
目的:本荟萃分析的目的是比较机器人辅助全髋关节置换术(R-THA)与传统全髋关节置换术(C-THA)治疗髋关节发育不良(DDH)的临床疗效。材料和方法:从Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、ScienceDirect和施普林格检索2025年5月前发表的符合条件的文章。搜索词包括“机器人辅助”,“髋关节发育不良”,“全髋关节置换术”,使用平均差异(md)和风险差异(rd)作为组合变量,并选择95%作为置信区间(CI)。结果:最终纳入7项临床研究,共876例患者。两组患者在杯倾角(MD=0.07, 95% CI: -0.95 ~ 1.10, p=0.89)、杯前倾(MD=-4.02, 95% CI: -9.59 ~ 1.55, p=0.16)、术中出血(MD=11.25, 95% CI: -56.02 ~ 78.52, p=0.74)、手术时间(MD=3.03, 95% CI: -15.66 ~ 21.72, p=0.75)、术后并发症(脱位[RD=-0.01, 95% CI: -0.03 ~ 0.01, p=0.26]、深部感染[RD=0.01, 95% CI: -0.01 ~ 0.02, p=0.37]、神经损伤[RD=0.01;95% ci: -0.01 ~ 0.03;p=0.56],翻修/再手术[RD=-0.00;95% ci: -0.03 ~ 0.03;p=1.00],旋转中心绝对垂直距离[COR] [MD=-0.50;95% ci: -1.07 ~ 0.06;p = 0.08)。然而,与C-THA组相比,R-THA组Harris髋关节评分(HHS)明显更高(MD=2.17, 95% CI: 0.11 ~ 4.22, p=0.04),水平COR的定位更准确(MD=-0.77, 95% CI: -1.21 ~ -0.32, p=0.0008)。结论:R-THA组可适度提高COR水平放置的准确性,术后HHS高于C-THA组,但患者可能没有明显意识到这种差异。此外,两组在其他手术相关参数和安全性方面无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书