Balancing strength and sterility: An in vitro assessment of the mechanical and antibacterial properties of bone cement loaded with various antibiotics.

IF 2.5 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Joint diseases and related surgery Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2026.2507
Tarik Elma, Hakan Yusuf Selek, Mehmet Ali Tokgoz, Ali Ekber Yapar, Tugba Cuhadar
{"title":"Balancing strength and sterility: An in vitro assessment of the mechanical and antibacterial properties of bone cement loaded with various antibiotics.","authors":"Tarik Elma, Hakan Yusuf Selek, Mehmet Ali Tokgoz, Ali Ekber Yapar, Tugba Cuhadar","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2026.2507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to determine the antimicrobial efficacy and mechanical strength of antibiotic-loaded cement samples in which daptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam agents were mixed at different doses and to investigate the differences between agents and between doses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We prepared standardized bone cement samples incorporating vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem at concentrations ranging from 0.625 to 15%. Samples underwent six-week phosphate-buffered saline immersion simulating physiological conditions. Mechanical testing employed four-point bending analysis following ISO 5833 standards. Antimicrobial efficacy was assessed using liquid microdilution against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa over 21 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All antibiotics demonstrated strong negative correlation between concentration and mechanical strength (r=-0.883 to -0.914, p<0.001). Critical threshold emerged at 5% antibiotic concentration, above which mechanical integrity was significantly compromised. Daptomycin and meropenem maintained superior mechanical properties at effective antimicrobial concentrations. At 2-g doses, daptomycin achieved significantly higher strength than piperacillin-tazobactam and teicoplanin (p=0.021). All antibiotics except low-dose piperacillin-tazobactam maintained complete antimicrobial efficacy throughout 21-day testing. Electron microscopy revealed increased porosity, which correlated with reduced mechanical strength, particularly in piperacillin-tazobactam and teicoplanin groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiotic selection significantly impacts both mechanical and antimicrobial properties of bone cement. Daptomycin and meropenem offer optimal balance of antimicrobial efficacy and mechanical integrity. These findings provide evidence-based guidelines for antibiotic selection in resistant infection management while maintaining structural requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"37 1","pages":"238-247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12788774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2026.2507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to determine the antimicrobial efficacy and mechanical strength of antibiotic-loaded cement samples in which daptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam agents were mixed at different doses and to investigate the differences between agents and between doses.

Materials and methods: We prepared standardized bone cement samples incorporating vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem at concentrations ranging from 0.625 to 15%. Samples underwent six-week phosphate-buffered saline immersion simulating physiological conditions. Mechanical testing employed four-point bending analysis following ISO 5833 standards. Antimicrobial efficacy was assessed using liquid microdilution against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa over 21 days.

Results: All antibiotics demonstrated strong negative correlation between concentration and mechanical strength (r=-0.883 to -0.914, p<0.001). Critical threshold emerged at 5% antibiotic concentration, above which mechanical integrity was significantly compromised. Daptomycin and meropenem maintained superior mechanical properties at effective antimicrobial concentrations. At 2-g doses, daptomycin achieved significantly higher strength than piperacillin-tazobactam and teicoplanin (p=0.021). All antibiotics except low-dose piperacillin-tazobactam maintained complete antimicrobial efficacy throughout 21-day testing. Electron microscopy revealed increased porosity, which correlated with reduced mechanical strength, particularly in piperacillin-tazobactam and teicoplanin groups.

Conclusion: Antibiotic selection significantly impacts both mechanical and antimicrobial properties of bone cement. Daptomycin and meropenem offer optimal balance of antimicrobial efficacy and mechanical integrity. These findings provide evidence-based guidelines for antibiotic selection in resistant infection management while maintaining structural requirements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

平衡强度和无菌性:装载各种抗生素的骨水泥力学和抗菌性能的体外评估。
目的:测定达托霉素、万古霉素、替柯planin、美罗培南、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦等抗生素载药水泥样品在不同剂量下的抗菌效果和机械强度,探讨不同剂量间、不同剂量间的差异。材料和方法:我们制备了标准骨水泥样品,样品中含有万古霉素、替可普宁、达托霉素、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和美罗培南,浓度范围为0.625 ~ 15%。样品进行了为期六周的模拟生理条件的磷酸盐缓冲盐水浸泡。机械测试采用四点弯曲分析,遵循ISO 5833标准。用微量稀释液对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌进行21天的抗菌效果评估。结果:抗菌药物浓度与骨水泥机械强度呈显著负相关(r=-0.883 ~ -0.914)。结论:抗菌药物的选择对骨水泥的机械性能和抗菌性能均有显著影响。达托霉素和美罗培南提供抗菌功效和机械完整性的最佳平衡。这些发现为耐药感染管理中的抗生素选择提供了循证指南,同时保持了结构要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书