Characterization of Secure Message Use in a Children's Hospital.

IF 2.1 Q1 Nursing
Austin DeChalus, Brooke Luo, Amina Khan, Alexis Z Tomlinson, Chris Bonafide, Halley Ruppel
{"title":"Characterization of Secure Message Use in a Children's Hospital.","authors":"Austin DeChalus, Brooke Luo, Amina Khan, Alexis Z Tomlinson, Chris Bonafide, Halley Ruppel","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2025-008538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Secure messaging is an increasingly common mode of communication among hospital-based clinicians. The use of these systems in pediatric settings is poorly understood. We sought to describe secure message volume, message response time, and emoji reaction use in a large children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted 6 months of secure message data from staff working on 3 inpatient units of an urban tertiary care children's hospital. Using assignment data, we isolated secure message activity during clinical shifts on these 3 units to report message volume, message response time, and emoji reaction use by unit and clinical role. We performed statistical analysis to compare message metrics within units and secondary analysis for key role comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2493 clinicians sent and read 2 848 677 secure messages during the study period. Physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) providing direct front-line care had the highest message use, a median of 13.4 (IQR 9.9, 17.3) combined sent and received messages per hour. We found significant differences in message volume and time to read, respond, and react to messages across clinical roles within units (all P<0.001). Front-line clinicians across units had significant differences in secure message volume and response times. (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Front-line physicians and APPs experienced the highest message burden per person across all clinical roles. We demonstrated nearly immediate message read and response times. Additional study is needed to understand the effects of secure messaging on clinician well-being and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e18-e23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2025-008538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Secure messaging is an increasingly common mode of communication among hospital-based clinicians. The use of these systems in pediatric settings is poorly understood. We sought to describe secure message volume, message response time, and emoji reaction use in a large children's hospital.

Methods: We extracted 6 months of secure message data from staff working on 3 inpatient units of an urban tertiary care children's hospital. Using assignment data, we isolated secure message activity during clinical shifts on these 3 units to report message volume, message response time, and emoji reaction use by unit and clinical role. We performed statistical analysis to compare message metrics within units and secondary analysis for key role comparisons.

Results: A total of 2493 clinicians sent and read 2 848 677 secure messages during the study period. Physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) providing direct front-line care had the highest message use, a median of 13.4 (IQR 9.9, 17.3) combined sent and received messages per hour. We found significant differences in message volume and time to read, respond, and react to messages across clinical roles within units (all P<0.001). Front-line clinicians across units had significant differences in secure message volume and response times. (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Front-line physicians and APPs experienced the highest message burden per person across all clinical roles. We demonstrated nearly immediate message read and response times. Additional study is needed to understand the effects of secure messaging on clinician well-being and patient safety.

儿童医院安全信息使用特征分析
目的:安全消息传递是医院临床医生之间日益普遍的通信模式。人们对这些系统在儿科环境中的使用了解甚少。我们试图描述一家大型儿童医院的安全信息量、信息响应时间和表情符号反应使用情况。方法:从某城市三级儿童医院3个住院单元的工作人员中提取6个月的安全信息数据。使用分配数据,我们在这3个单位的临床轮班期间隔离了安全消息活动,以报告按单位和临床角色使用的消息量、消息响应时间和表情符号反应。我们执行了统计分析来比较单元内的消息度量,并执行了次要分析来比较关键角色。结果:在研究期间,共有2493名临床医生发送和阅读了2 848 677条安全信息。提供直接一线护理的医生和高级实践提供者(app)的短信使用率最高,每小时发送和接收的短信中位数为13.4条(IQR 9.9, 17.3)。我们发现,在单位内不同临床角色的信息量和阅读、回应和反应信息的时间上存在显著差异。结论:在所有临床角色中,一线医生和app的人均信息负担最高。我们演示了几乎即时的消息读取和响应时间。需要进一步的研究来了解安全信息对临床医生福祉和患者安全的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书