Knee arthrofixation with modular nail as salvage for periprosthetic infection: Evaluation of quality of life and implant survival

IF 3.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Alejo M. Gonzalez Fantini, Hernan G. Sanchez Mele, Julian Costantini, Lisandro Carbo, Juan F. Astoul Bonorino, Tomás I. Nicolino
{"title":"Knee arthrofixation with modular nail as salvage for periprosthetic infection: Evaluation of quality of life and implant survival","authors":"Alejo M. Gonzalez Fantini,&nbsp;Hernan G. Sanchez Mele,&nbsp;Julian Costantini,&nbsp;Lisandro Carbo,&nbsp;Juan F. Astoul Bonorino,&nbsp;Tomás I. Nicolino","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2025.101050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication that can lead to severe bone defects, a lack of soft tissue coverage, and poor infection control. Knee arthrofixation, using modular intramedullary nails and a cement block as a spacer, is a salvage procedure for these situations, serving as an alternative to limb amputation.</div><div>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the postoperative quality of life of patients undergoing knee arthrofixation with modular intramedullary nails. Secondary objectives included assessing implant survival, complication rates, and the rate of infection cure.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 34 patients treated with knee arthrofixation using an intramedullary nail as a definitive treatment for periprosthetic infection between 2015 and 2023 at a single institution. The minimum follow-up period was one year. In addition to the initial evaluation of clinical characteristics, patients' quality of life was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Implant survival, complications, and the proportion of patients who achieved infection cure according to Laffer's criteria were also analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the one-year follow-up after surgery, a moderate-to-good quality of life score of 32, standard deviation (SD) 12, was reported, with an implant survival rate of 77%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 56–88%, according to Kaplan–Meier estimates. The number of previous surgeries before arthrofixation was 9. Soft tissue flap coverage was required in 46.4% of cases. A modular intramedullary nail was used as the implant of choice in 88.2% of cases. Except for one case, all patients presented with a severe AORI 3 bone defect. Following reconstruction, the average limb length discrepancy was 28 mm. A 35% complication rate was recorded, including six amputations, three nail replacements due to persistent infection, and three implant fractures. The most frequently identified primary pathogen was methicillin-sensitive <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. The infection cure rate in this series was 56.5%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Knee arthrofixation is a feasible limb-salvage strategy for recurrent periprosthetic infections, though our series showed increased reinfection rates and lower implant survival compared with previous reports.</div></div><div><h3>Evidence level</h3><div>IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 101050"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775425006686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication that can lead to severe bone defects, a lack of soft tissue coverage, and poor infection control. Knee arthrofixation, using modular intramedullary nails and a cement block as a spacer, is a salvage procedure for these situations, serving as an alternative to limb amputation.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the postoperative quality of life of patients undergoing knee arthrofixation with modular intramedullary nails. Secondary objectives included assessing implant survival, complication rates, and the rate of infection cure.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 34 patients treated with knee arthrofixation using an intramedullary nail as a definitive treatment for periprosthetic infection between 2015 and 2023 at a single institution. The minimum follow-up period was one year. In addition to the initial evaluation of clinical characteristics, patients' quality of life was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Implant survival, complications, and the proportion of patients who achieved infection cure according to Laffer's criteria were also analyzed.

Results

At the one-year follow-up after surgery, a moderate-to-good quality of life score of 32, standard deviation (SD) 12, was reported, with an implant survival rate of 77%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 56–88%, according to Kaplan–Meier estimates. The number of previous surgeries before arthrofixation was 9. Soft tissue flap coverage was required in 46.4% of cases. A modular intramedullary nail was used as the implant of choice in 88.2% of cases. Except for one case, all patients presented with a severe AORI 3 bone defect. Following reconstruction, the average limb length discrepancy was 28 mm. A 35% complication rate was recorded, including six amputations, three nail replacements due to persistent infection, and three implant fractures. The most frequently identified primary pathogen was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. The infection cure rate in this series was 56.5%.

Conclusion

Knee arthrofixation is a feasible limb-salvage strategy for recurrent periprosthetic infections, though our series showed increased reinfection rates and lower implant survival compared with previous reports.

Evidence level

IV.
模块化钉固定膝关节修复假体周围感染。生活质量和种植体存活评估。
导语:假体周围关节感染(PJI)是一种并发症,可导致严重的骨缺损、软组织覆盖不足和感染控制不良。膝关节固定,使用模块化髓内钉和水泥块作为间隔,是对这些情况的一种挽救性手术,作为截肢的替代方法。本研究的主要目的是评估采用模块化髓内钉进行膝关节固定的患者的术后生活质量。次要目的包括评估种植体存活、并发症发生率和感染治愈率。材料和方法:对2015年至2023年在同一医院接受髓内钉作为假体周围感染的最终治疗的34例膝关节固定患者进行回顾性队列研究。最低随访期为一年。除了临床特征的初步评估外,还使用牛津膝关节评分(OKS)评估患者的生活质量。并分析种植体存活、并发症及按照Laffer标准感染治愈的患者比例。结果:术后1年随访,报告中至良好生活质量评分为32,标准差(SD)为12,种植体存活率为77%,95%可信区间(CI)为56-88%,Kaplan-Meier估计。关节固定前手术次数为9次。46.4%的病例需要软组织瓣覆盖。88.2%的病例选择模块化髓内钉作为种植体。除1例外,所有患者均表现为严重的AORI 3型骨缺损。重建后,平均肢长差异为28毫米。并发症发生率为35%,包括6例截肢,3例因持续感染而更换指甲,3例种植体骨折。最常见的原发病原体是甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌。本组感染治愈率为56.5%。结论:对于复发性假体周围感染,膝关节固定是一种可行的肢体保留策略,尽管我们的研究表明与之前的报道相比,再感染率增加,假体存活率降低。证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书