Nothing About Us Without Us in the First 1000 Days: Developing Inclusive Early Years Support With Disabled Families.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Angharad E Beckett, Neve McLean, Anna Miller, Rachel Heaton, Daria Borisova
{"title":"Nothing About Us Without Us in the First 1000 Days: Developing Inclusive Early Years Support With Disabled Families.","authors":"Angharad E Beckett, Neve McLean, Anna Miller, Rachel Heaton, Daria Borisova","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reports on co-design workshops with 11 disabled families ('co-designers') as part of developing a 'universal' (for all families) early years programme in health and social care. The programme aims to enhance caregiver and infant well-being. Given well-documented limitations of existing support for disabled families, ensuring disability inclusion from the outset was essential. The term 'disabled families' refers to 2 configurations: families where a parent is disabled and families of disabled children. Intensive workshops employed barrier mapping and solution generation activities. Thematic analysis revealed four domains where co-designers identified exclusionary practices and proposed inclusive alternatives: physical and environmental accessibility, programme design flexibility, content inclusivity and professional practice and empowerment. Co-designers demonstrated how institutional ableism operates through inaccessible venues, rigid attendance policies, normative developmental milestones and dismissal of parental expertise. Solutions moved beyond surface accommodations towards fundamental transformation. Co-designers proposed accessible venues with sensory considerations, flexible attendance, strength-based content, comprehensive facilitator training validating experiential knowledge and enabled peer support. This study demonstrates that meaningful inclusion requires dismantling rather than retrofitting exclusionary systems. Co-designers' insights provide both structural critique of institutional ableism and practical design principles for inclusive provision, showing how participatory approaches can generate alternative possibilities for equitable family support.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"48 1","pages":"e70118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12702093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports on co-design workshops with 11 disabled families ('co-designers') as part of developing a 'universal' (for all families) early years programme in health and social care. The programme aims to enhance caregiver and infant well-being. Given well-documented limitations of existing support for disabled families, ensuring disability inclusion from the outset was essential. The term 'disabled families' refers to 2 configurations: families where a parent is disabled and families of disabled children. Intensive workshops employed barrier mapping and solution generation activities. Thematic analysis revealed four domains where co-designers identified exclusionary practices and proposed inclusive alternatives: physical and environmental accessibility, programme design flexibility, content inclusivity and professional practice and empowerment. Co-designers demonstrated how institutional ableism operates through inaccessible venues, rigid attendance policies, normative developmental milestones and dismissal of parental expertise. Solutions moved beyond surface accommodations towards fundamental transformation. Co-designers proposed accessible venues with sensory considerations, flexible attendance, strength-based content, comprehensive facilitator training validating experiential knowledge and enabled peer support. This study demonstrates that meaningful inclusion requires dismantling rather than retrofitting exclusionary systems. Co-designers' insights provide both structural critique of institutional ableism and practical design principles for inclusive provision, showing how participatory approaches can generate alternative possibilities for equitable family support.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在最初的1000天里,没有我们就没有我们:为残疾家庭提供包容性的早期支持。
本文报道了与11个残疾家庭(“共同设计者”)共同设计讲习班,作为制定“普遍”(面向所有家庭)早期保健和社会护理方案的一部分。该方案旨在提高照顾者和婴儿的福利。鉴于对残疾家庭现有支助的充分限制,确保从一开始就将残疾纳入其中是至关重要的。“残疾家庭”指的是两种情况:父母一方是残疾的家庭和有残疾儿童的家庭。密集的研讨会采用了障碍映射和解决方案生成活动。专题分析揭示了共同设计者确定排他性做法并提出包容性替代方案的四个领域:物理和环境可及性、方案设计灵活性、内容包容性以及专业实践和赋权。共同设计师展示了机构残疾歧视是如何通过难以进入的场所、严格的出勤政策、规范的发展里程碑和对父母专业知识的忽视来运作的。解决方案超越了表面的适应,走向了根本性的转变。合作设计师提出了无障碍的场地,包括感官考虑、灵活的出席、基于力量的内容、全面的引导者培训、验证经验知识和同伴支持。这项研究表明,有意义的包容需要拆除而不是改造排斥系统。共同设计师的见解既提供了对制度残疾主义的结构性批评,也提供了包容性提供的实用设计原则,展示了参与式方法如何为公平的家庭支持产生替代可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书