Comparative incidence of peripheral neuropathy associated with taxane chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: A network meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI:10.1177/10781552251405216
Samineh Beheshtirouy, Zeinab Nikniaz, Saba Ghaffary, Raha Jaberi, Elnaz Shaseb
{"title":"Comparative incidence of peripheral neuropathy associated with taxane chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: A network meta-analysis.","authors":"Samineh Beheshtirouy, Zeinab Nikniaz, Saba Ghaffary, Raha Jaberi, Elnaz Shaseb","doi":"10.1177/10781552251405216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionTaxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a common toxicity among patients with breast cancer (BC). Numerous pairwise comparisons have been performed to evaluate neuropathy associated with different taxane agents (docetaxel, paclitaxel, cabazitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, liposomal paclitaxel, and paclitaxel injection concentrate for nanodispersion [PICN]). This network meta-analysis aimed to study the comparative incidence of TIPN associated with taxane agents in females with BC.MethodsA comprehensive data search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to August 2024. The studies that compare neuropathy in taxane agents were systematically reviewed. A network meta-analysis was carried out based on a Bayesian framework to evaluate the incidence of peripheral neuropathy in taxanes compared to paclitaxel, as reference comparator. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) was used to rank taxanes based on their neuropathy.ResultsA total of 27 studies with 12101 patients were included. When compared with paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel was associated with a significantly higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy (OR: 1.74, CrI: 1.22-2.48). Docetaxel (OR: 0.626, CrI: 0.441-0.881) and cabazitaxel (OR: 0.158, CrI: 0.0664-0.375) demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of peripheral neuropathy compared to paclitaxel. Liposomal paclitaxel and PICN lack significant difference compared to paclitaxel. Our analysis provided the order for peripheral neuropathy (from lowest to highest) as follows: cabazitaxel, docetaxel, liposomal paclitaxel, paclitaxel, PICN, nab-paclitaxel.ConclusionsNab-paclitaxel is associated with a significantly higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy compared to paclitaxel in females with BC. Docetaxel and cabazitaxel are linked with less peripheral neuropathy compared with paclitaxel in this population. No significant differences were observed in liposomal paclitaxel and PICN compared to paclitaxel.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1153-1167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251405216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionTaxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a common toxicity among patients with breast cancer (BC). Numerous pairwise comparisons have been performed to evaluate neuropathy associated with different taxane agents (docetaxel, paclitaxel, cabazitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, liposomal paclitaxel, and paclitaxel injection concentrate for nanodispersion [PICN]). This network meta-analysis aimed to study the comparative incidence of TIPN associated with taxane agents in females with BC.MethodsA comprehensive data search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to August 2024. The studies that compare neuropathy in taxane agents were systematically reviewed. A network meta-analysis was carried out based on a Bayesian framework to evaluate the incidence of peripheral neuropathy in taxanes compared to paclitaxel, as reference comparator. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) was used to rank taxanes based on their neuropathy.ResultsA total of 27 studies with 12101 patients were included. When compared with paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel was associated with a significantly higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy (OR: 1.74, CrI: 1.22-2.48). Docetaxel (OR: 0.626, CrI: 0.441-0.881) and cabazitaxel (OR: 0.158, CrI: 0.0664-0.375) demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of peripheral neuropathy compared to paclitaxel. Liposomal paclitaxel and PICN lack significant difference compared to paclitaxel. Our analysis provided the order for peripheral neuropathy (from lowest to highest) as follows: cabazitaxel, docetaxel, liposomal paclitaxel, paclitaxel, PICN, nab-paclitaxel.ConclusionsNab-paclitaxel is associated with a significantly higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy compared to paclitaxel in females with BC. Docetaxel and cabazitaxel are linked with less peripheral neuropathy compared with paclitaxel in this population. No significant differences were observed in liposomal paclitaxel and PICN compared to paclitaxel.

乳腺癌患者紫杉烷化疗相关周围神经病变的比较发生率:网络荟萃分析。
紫杉烷诱导的周围神经病变(TIPN)是乳腺癌(BC)患者中常见的毒性。为了评估不同紫杉醇类药物(多西他赛、紫杉醇、卡巴他赛、nab-紫杉醇、脂质体紫杉醇和纳米分散紫杉醇注射浓缩物[PICN])相关的神经病变,已经进行了大量的两两比较。本网络荟萃分析旨在研究与紫杉烷类药物相关的TIPN在女性BC患者中的发病率。方法综合检索截至2024年8月的PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库。本文系统回顾了比较紫杉烷类药物神经病变的研究。基于贝叶斯框架进行网络荟萃分析,以评估紫杉烷与紫杉醇作为参考比较物的周围神经病变发生率。采用累积排序曲线下曲面(SUCRA)对紫杉烷类进行神经病变排序。结果共纳入27项研究,12101例患者。与紫杉醇相比,nab-紫杉醇与周围神经病变的发生率显著升高相关(OR: 1.74, CrI: 1.22-2.48)。与紫杉醇相比,多西他赛(OR: 0.626, CrI: 0.441-0.881)和卡巴他赛(OR: 0.158, CrI: 0.0664-0.375)的周围神经病变发生率显著降低。与紫杉醇相比,脂质体紫杉醇与PICN无显著性差异。我们的分析提供了周围神经病变的顺序(从低到高):卡巴他赛、多西他赛、脂质体紫杉醇、紫杉醇、PICN、nab-紫杉醇。结论与紫杉醇相比,snab -紫杉醇与女性BC患者周围神经病变的发生率显著升高相关。在这一人群中,与紫杉醇相比,多西他赛和卡巴他赛与更少的周围神经病变相关。与紫杉醇相比,脂质体紫杉醇和PICN无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书