Anger-Related Affect and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 7.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Kirsten H Dillon, Tapan A Patel, Molly Goodrich, Sarah Siegel, Stefanie T LoSavio, David Miller, Gabriella Ponzini, Pallavi Aurora, Samantha Kaplan, Nathan A Kimbrel, Tate F Halverson
{"title":"Anger-Related Affect and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Kirsten H Dillon, Tapan A Patel, Molly Goodrich, Sarah Siegel, Stefanie T LoSavio, David Miller, Gabriella Ponzini, Pallavi Aurora, Samantha Kaplan, Nathan A Kimbrel, Tate F Halverson","doi":"10.1037/cps0000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Growing evidence indicates anger-related affect (i.e., anger, hostility, and irritability) is a transdiagnostic risk factor for suicide. The goal of this meta-analysis was to systematically review the literature and calculate the effect size of these relationships.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We examined the relationships between suicidal thoughts and behaviors and anger, irritability, and hostility with data from 107 published studies (total <i>N</i> = 141,434).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analyses uncovered a moderate-sized average correlation (<i>r</i> = .31) between anger-related affect and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. There were no significant differences between the effect size estimates of the three separate anger constructs. Studies assessing suicide attempts were associated with significantly lower effect sizes than studies assessing death by suicide or suicidal ideation. Studies that assessed suicidal thoughts and behaviors using a clinical interview were associated with lower effect size estimates than those assessing via self-report or chart review. Additionally, studies that assessed current suicidal thoughts and behaviors were associated with higher effect size estimates versus those that assessed lifetime occurrence. Studies that assessed suicide in an outpatient setting were associated with lower effect sizes than those in community, inpatient, or forensic settings. There were no other significant moderators (i.e., sociodemographic or study design variables) of the relationship between overall anger and suicide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight the importance of anger as a potential risk factor for suicide. Future research is needed to examine these relationships longitudinally and to look at different facets of anger (e.g. experience vs. expression).</p>","PeriodicalId":10434,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","volume":"32 4","pages":"354-367"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12697221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Growing evidence indicates anger-related affect (i.e., anger, hostility, and irritability) is a transdiagnostic risk factor for suicide. The goal of this meta-analysis was to systematically review the literature and calculate the effect size of these relationships.

Method: We examined the relationships between suicidal thoughts and behaviors and anger, irritability, and hostility with data from 107 published studies (total N = 141,434).

Results: Our analyses uncovered a moderate-sized average correlation (r = .31) between anger-related affect and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. There were no significant differences between the effect size estimates of the three separate anger constructs. Studies assessing suicide attempts were associated with significantly lower effect sizes than studies assessing death by suicide or suicidal ideation. Studies that assessed suicidal thoughts and behaviors using a clinical interview were associated with lower effect size estimates than those assessing via self-report or chart review. Additionally, studies that assessed current suicidal thoughts and behaviors were associated with higher effect size estimates versus those that assessed lifetime occurrence. Studies that assessed suicide in an outpatient setting were associated with lower effect sizes than those in community, inpatient, or forensic settings. There were no other significant moderators (i.e., sociodemographic or study design variables) of the relationship between overall anger and suicide.

Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of anger as a potential risk factor for suicide. Future research is needed to examine these relationships longitudinally and to look at different facets of anger (e.g. experience vs. expression).

愤怒相关情绪与自杀想法和行为:系统回顾和元分析。
目的:越来越多的证据表明,愤怒相关情绪(即愤怒、敌意和易怒)是自杀的跨诊断风险因素。本荟萃分析的目的是系统地回顾文献并计算这些关系的效应大小。方法:我们用107篇已发表的研究(N = 141,434)的数据来研究自杀想法和行为与愤怒、易怒和敌意之间的关系。结果:我们的分析揭示了愤怒相关情绪与自杀想法和行为之间的中等平均相关性(r = 0.31)。三个单独的愤怒构念的效应量估计之间没有显著差异。评估自杀企图的研究的效应量明显低于评估自杀或自杀意念死亡的研究。使用临床访谈评估自杀想法和行为的研究与通过自我报告或图表回顾评估的研究相比,效果值估计较低。此外,评估当前自杀想法和行为的研究与评估终生发生的研究相比,具有更高的效应值。在门诊评估自杀的研究比在社区、住院或法医评估自杀的研究有更低的效应值。总体愤怒和自杀之间的关系没有其他显著的调节因子(即社会人口统计学或研究设计变量)。结论:研究结果强调了愤怒作为自杀潜在风险因素的重要性。未来的研究需要对这些关系进行纵向研究,并从不同的方面来研究愤怒(例如,体验与表达)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice presents cutting-edge developments in the science and practice of clinical psychology and related mental health fields by publishing scholarly articles, primarily involving narrative and systematic reviews as well as meta-analyses related to assessment, intervention, and service delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书