Core Mental Health Data Set (CMHDS) methods feasibility paper.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kathryn Mary Abel, Auden Edwardes, Heidi Tranter, Paul Dark, Robert D Sandler, Philip A Kalra, Ann John, Martin Wildman, Philip Bell, Nawar Diar Bakerly, Pauline Whelan
{"title":"Core Mental Health Data Set (CMHDS) methods feasibility paper.","authors":"Kathryn Mary Abel, Auden Edwardes, Heidi Tranter, Paul Dark, Robert D Sandler, Philip A Kalra, Ann John, Martin Wildman, Philip Bell, Nawar Diar Bakerly, Pauline Whelan","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Little research focuses on mechanisms underlying the well-recognised relationship between mental and physical health, or its potential to influence adherence and response to treatments. This short report summarises results of the National Institute for Health and Care Research-funded 'Core Mental Health Data Set (CMHDS)' study to embed a digital tool for routine collection of mental health data in physical health studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four chief investigators of physical health trials were approached to embed the CMHDS into their study. Two trials, one for people receiving specialist cystic fibrosis (CF) care, and the established Salford Kidney Study (SKS) successfully managed to embed CMHDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A combined 478 participants from both studies were invited to complete the CMHDS. Of those approached, 88% agreed to complete CMHDS; 44% completed it. In the SKS, people who completed CMHDS were significantly younger and had higher estimated glomerular filtration rates and were from least deprived areas. In the CF study, there was no significant difference in characteristics of participants who did or did not complete the tool.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It was feasible, and researchers and participants considered it acceptable, to embed the CMHDS in physical health studies as part of routine data collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future studies should embed the CMHDS routinely and encourage completion to minimise bias and optimise the added value of having mental health covariates or predictor variables in physical health studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12699609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Little research focuses on mechanisms underlying the well-recognised relationship between mental and physical health, or its potential to influence adherence and response to treatments. This short report summarises results of the National Institute for Health and Care Research-funded 'Core Mental Health Data Set (CMHDS)' study to embed a digital tool for routine collection of mental health data in physical health studies.

Methods: Four chief investigators of physical health trials were approached to embed the CMHDS into their study. Two trials, one for people receiving specialist cystic fibrosis (CF) care, and the established Salford Kidney Study (SKS) successfully managed to embed CMHDS.

Results: A combined 478 participants from both studies were invited to complete the CMHDS. Of those approached, 88% agreed to complete CMHDS; 44% completed it. In the SKS, people who completed CMHDS were significantly younger and had higher estimated glomerular filtration rates and were from least deprived areas. In the CF study, there was no significant difference in characteristics of participants who did or did not complete the tool.

Discussion: It was feasible, and researchers and participants considered it acceptable, to embed the CMHDS in physical health studies as part of routine data collection.

Conclusion: Future studies should embed the CMHDS routinely and encourage completion to minimise bias and optimise the added value of having mental health covariates or predictor variables in physical health studies.

核心心理健康数据集(CMHDS)方法可行性论文。
目的:很少有研究关注心理和身体健康之间公认关系的潜在机制,或其影响治疗依从性和反应的潜力。这份简短的报告总结了国家卫生与保健研究所资助的“核心心理健康数据集(CMHDS)”研究的结果,该研究将一个用于常规收集心理健康数据的数字工具嵌入到身体健康研究中。方法:与4位身体健康试验的首席研究员接洽,将CMHDS纳入他们的研究。两项试验,一项是针对接受囊肿性纤维化(CF)治疗的患者,另一项是已建立的索尔福德肾脏研究(SKS),成功地嵌入了CMHDS。结果:两项研究共邀请478名参与者完成CMHDS。在接受治疗的患者中,88%的人同意完成cmds;44%的人完成了。在SKS中,完成CMHDS的患者明显更年轻,估计肾小球滤过率更高,并且来自最贫困地区。在CF研究中,完成或未完成该工具的参与者在特征上没有显著差异。讨论:将CMHDS作为常规数据收集的一部分纳入身体健康研究是可行的,研究者和参与者都认为这是可以接受的。结论:未来的研究应常规纳入CMHDS,并鼓励完成,以尽量减少偏倚,优化心理健康协变量或预测变量在身体健康研究中的附加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书