{"title":"Acculturation under crisis: A systematic review of international students’ psychological adjustment during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Thi Nhu Y. Dam, Cagatay Karakoc, Maria Chayinska","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on international students’ acculturation experiences, distinguishing between acculturative stressors (e.g., discrimination, language barriers) and COVID-19-specific stressors (e.g., fear of infection, lockdown-related uncertainty). Following the PRISMA framework, three major databases—PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science—were searched, yielding 108 records, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for methodological quality. One of these studies was subsequently retracted and another was excluded based on a journal-quality threshold (Q4 / lowest SJR band), resulting in a final thematic synthesis based on 19 empirical studies. Using a structured thematic synthesis approach, the findings were categorized into three thematic domains: (1) primary acculturative challenges, (2) coping strategies and resilience mechanisms, and (3) long-term consequences of pandemic-related adaptation. The review reveals that international students faced significant disruptions to their academic engagement, heightened social isolation, and financial insecurity—factors that collectively intensified psychological distress. Although students demonstrated adaptability by employing diverse coping strategies, institutional support systems in host countries were frequently perceived as inadequate. Implications for policy and practice in international higher education are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725002160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on international students’ acculturation experiences, distinguishing between acculturative stressors (e.g., discrimination, language barriers) and COVID-19-specific stressors (e.g., fear of infection, lockdown-related uncertainty). Following the PRISMA framework, three major databases—PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science—were searched, yielding 108 records, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for methodological quality. One of these studies was subsequently retracted and another was excluded based on a journal-quality threshold (Q4 / lowest SJR band), resulting in a final thematic synthesis based on 19 empirical studies. Using a structured thematic synthesis approach, the findings were categorized into three thematic domains: (1) primary acculturative challenges, (2) coping strategies and resilience mechanisms, and (3) long-term consequences of pandemic-related adaptation. The review reveals that international students faced significant disruptions to their academic engagement, heightened social isolation, and financial insecurity—factors that collectively intensified psychological distress. Although students demonstrated adaptability by employing diverse coping strategies, institutional support systems in host countries were frequently perceived as inadequate. Implications for policy and practice in international higher education are discussed.
本系统综述综合了COVID-19大流行对国际学生文化适应体验心理影响的经验证据,区分了非文化压力源(如歧视、语言障碍)和COVID-19特异性压力源(如对感染的恐惧、封锁相关的不确定性)。按照PRISMA框架,检索了三个主要数据库——pubmed、Scopus和Web of science,得到108条记录,其中21条符合纳入标准,并对方法学质量进行了评估。其中一项研究随后被撤回,另一项研究基于期刊质量阈值(Q4 /最低SJR波段)被排除,从而产生了基于19项实证研究的最终主题综合。采用结构化主题综合方法,将研究结果分为三个主题领域:(1)主要的异文化挑战;(2)应对策略和复原力机制;(3)与流行病相关的适应的长期后果。该审查显示,国际学生面临着学术参与严重中断、社会孤立加剧和经济不安全的因素,这些因素共同加剧了心理困扰。虽然学生通过采用不同的应对策略表现出适应能力,但东道国的制度支持系统经常被认为是不充分的。对国际高等教育政策和实践的启示进行了讨论。
期刊介绍:
IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.