Recalibration of the Framingham coronary heart disease risk score for a selected Sri Lankan population and its association with carotid artery intima-media thickness: A cross-sectional study.

IF 0.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2025-12-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20480040251405685
Visula Abeysuriya, Prakash Priyadharshan, Lal Gotabaya Chandrasena, Ananda Rajitha Wickremasinghe
{"title":"Recalibration of the Framingham coronary heart disease risk score for a selected Sri Lankan population and its association with carotid artery intima-media thickness: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Visula Abeysuriya, Prakash Priyadharshan, Lal Gotabaya Chandrasena, Ananda Rajitha Wickremasinghe","doi":"10.1177/20480040251405685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a non-invasive marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and a predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD). This study aimed (1) to recalibrate the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) using Sri Lankan population data and (2) to evaluate the association between the recalibrated FRS models and carotid artery CIMT measurements.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>A sample of 356 participants aged 40-74 with no CHD history was selected from a tertiary hospital in Sri Lanka. The first published FRS equation, β-coefficients, 10-year CHD-free survival rates (separately for all ages (model 1) and for 40-74 years (model 2)), and local risk factor prevalence were used for recalibration. CIMT was measured in mm by ultrasonography, and a composite CIMT score was derived.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Association between recalibrated FRS models and CIMT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the sample was 58.7 ± 10.1 years (52.5% male). The original FRS (oFRS) categorised more participants into higher 10-year-CHD risk groups than the recalibrated FRS (rFRS) models. Among males, 30.5% and among females, 68.0% had consistent classifications across all models. CIMT-values differed significantly by risk category for both oFRS and rFRS models (<i>P</i><.05), with rFRS models showing higher CIMT-values. The composite carotid scores (ACA-CIMT and ACA-Max) were positively correlated with all FRS models (<i>P</i>=.001). CIMT values were higher in recalibrated models, with model 1 showing higher values than model 2 in males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recalibrated FRS models provided lower overall CHD risk estimates while maintaining stronger associations with CIMT than the original FRS, supporting their improved applicability for CHD risk prediction in the Sri Lankan population.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"14 ","pages":"20480040251405685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12681567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040251405685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a non-invasive marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and a predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD). This study aimed (1) to recalibrate the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) using Sri Lankan population data and (2) to evaluate the association between the recalibrated FRS models and carotid artery CIMT measurements.

Design setting and participants: A sample of 356 participants aged 40-74 with no CHD history was selected from a tertiary hospital in Sri Lanka. The first published FRS equation, β-coefficients, 10-year CHD-free survival rates (separately for all ages (model 1) and for 40-74 years (model 2)), and local risk factor prevalence were used for recalibration. CIMT was measured in mm by ultrasonography, and a composite CIMT score was derived.

Main outcome measure: Association between recalibrated FRS models and CIMT.

Results: The mean age of the sample was 58.7 ± 10.1 years (52.5% male). The original FRS (oFRS) categorised more participants into higher 10-year-CHD risk groups than the recalibrated FRS (rFRS) models. Among males, 30.5% and among females, 68.0% had consistent classifications across all models. CIMT-values differed significantly by risk category for both oFRS and rFRS models (P<.05), with rFRS models showing higher CIMT-values. The composite carotid scores (ACA-CIMT and ACA-Max) were positively correlated with all FRS models (P=.001). CIMT values were higher in recalibrated models, with model 1 showing higher values than model 2 in males.

Conclusions: The recalibrated FRS models provided lower overall CHD risk estimates while maintaining stronger associations with CIMT than the original FRS, supporting their improved applicability for CHD risk prediction in the Sri Lankan population.

重新校准选定的斯里兰卡人群的Framingham冠心病风险评分及其与颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度的关系:一项横断面研究
目的:颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度(CIMT)是亚临床动脉粥样硬化的非侵入性标志物和冠心病(CHD)的预测因子。本研究旨在(1)利用斯里兰卡人口数据重新校准Framingham风险评分(FRS);(2)评估重新校准的FRS模型与颈动脉CIMT测量之间的关联。设计环境和参与者:从斯里兰卡的一家三级医院选择了356名年龄在40-74岁之间、无冠心病病史的参与者。首次发表的FRS方程、β系数、10年无冠心病生存率(分别针对所有年龄段(模型1)和40-74岁(模型2))和当地危险因素患病率进行重新校准。超声测量CIMT (mm),得出综合CIMT评分。主要结果测量:重新校准的FRS模型与CIMT之间的关系。结果:患者平均年龄58.7±10.1岁,男性占52.5%。原始的FRS (oFRS)比重新校准的FRS (rFRS)模型将更多的参与者分类为10年冠心病高风险组。30.5%的男性和68.0%的女性在所有模型中都有一致的分类。oFRS和rFRS模型的cimt值因风险类别而有显著差异(PP= 0.001)。在重新校准的模型中,CIMT值更高,在男性中,模型1的值高于模型2。结论:与原始FRS相比,重新校准的FRS模型提供了更低的总体冠心病风险估计,但与CIMT保持更强的关联,支持其在斯里兰卡人群中冠心病风险预测的改进适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书