Disentangling Responsibility: Perspectives on Dementia Prevention From Stakeholders in Canada, Germany and Switzerland.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Niklas Petersen, Mattia Andreoletti, Alessandro Blasimme, Cynthia Lazzaroni, Annette Leibing, Silke Schicktanz
{"title":"Disentangling Responsibility: Perspectives on Dementia Prevention From Stakeholders in Canada, Germany and Switzerland.","authors":"Niklas Petersen, Mattia Andreoletti, Alessandro Blasimme, Cynthia Lazzaroni, Annette Leibing, Silke Schicktanz","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dementia prevention has become a priority in medical research and public health. Various medical, social and environmental risk factors have been identified; however, medical studies, media discourses and health policies predominantly centre on individual-level prevention and promote personal responsibility for maintaining cognitive health. This emphasis on individual preventive efforts faces increasing criticism for being ethically problematic, medically insufficient and reflective of a neoliberal responsibilisation of (cognitive) ageing. Our study, based on 60 semi-structured qualitative interviews with stakeholders involved in dementia research, care and health policy from Canada, Germany and Switzerland, situates the preventive turn within contemporary ageing cultures and welfare policies. By examining the epistemic and normative arguments underlying current debates on dementia prevention, we illustrate how stakeholders justify both personal and governmental responsibilities in preventing dementia. Although managing and mitigating various risk factors throughout life is often framed as a matter of personal responsibility, many stakeholders advocate combining individual-level prevention with population-level efforts to address social inequalities that affect the risk of developing dementia. Drawing on the interview study, we highlight the importance of recognising the political and normative foundations and implications of dementia prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"48 1","pages":"e70126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dementia prevention has become a priority in medical research and public health. Various medical, social and environmental risk factors have been identified; however, medical studies, media discourses and health policies predominantly centre on individual-level prevention and promote personal responsibility for maintaining cognitive health. This emphasis on individual preventive efforts faces increasing criticism for being ethically problematic, medically insufficient and reflective of a neoliberal responsibilisation of (cognitive) ageing. Our study, based on 60 semi-structured qualitative interviews with stakeholders involved in dementia research, care and health policy from Canada, Germany and Switzerland, situates the preventive turn within contemporary ageing cultures and welfare policies. By examining the epistemic and normative arguments underlying current debates on dementia prevention, we illustrate how stakeholders justify both personal and governmental responsibilities in preventing dementia. Although managing and mitigating various risk factors throughout life is often framed as a matter of personal responsibility, many stakeholders advocate combining individual-level prevention with population-level efforts to address social inequalities that affect the risk of developing dementia. Drawing on the interview study, we highlight the importance of recognising the political and normative foundations and implications of dementia prevention strategies.

责任分离:加拿大、德国和瑞士利益相关者对痴呆症预防的看法。
预防痴呆症已成为医学研究和公共卫生的优先事项。已经确定了各种医疗、社会和环境风险因素;然而,医学研究、媒体话语和卫生政策主要以个人层面的预防为中心,并促进个人对维持认知健康的责任。这种强调个人预防努力的做法面临越来越多的批评,因为它在伦理上有问题,在医学上不够充分,反映了对(认知)老龄化的新自由主义责任。我们的研究基于对来自加拿大、德国和瑞士的痴呆症研究、护理和卫生政策的利益相关者进行的60次半结构化定性访谈,将预防转向置于当代老龄化文化和福利政策之中。通过研究当前痴呆症预防辩论的认知和规范论点,我们说明了利益相关者如何证明个人和政府在预防痴呆症方面的责任。尽管在一生中管理和减轻各种风险因素往往被视为个人责任,但许多利益攸关方主张将个人层面的预防与人群层面的努力结合起来,以解决影响患痴呆症风险的社会不平等问题。根据访谈研究,我们强调认识到痴呆症预防策略的政治和规范基础及其含义的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书