Evaluation of a Longitudinal Medical School Health Literacy Curriculum.

Q2 Medicine
Health literacy research and practice Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-08 DOI:10.3928/24748307-20250710-01
Mark B Troyer, Elizabeth A Abrams, Jeff Barbee, Michael J Alexander, Joanne B Vakil, Mary Ann Abrams
{"title":"Evaluation of a Longitudinal Medical School Health Literacy Curriculum.","authors":"Mark B Troyer, Elizabeth A Abrams, Jeff Barbee, Michael J Alexander, Joanne B Vakil, Mary Ann Abrams","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20250710-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite recommendations that medical schools incorporate health literacy (HL) into curricula and identification of consensus areas of HL competence, high-quality data are needed for curricular characteristics and structured evaluation that foster sustained HL competency adoption.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate a comprehensive longitudinal medical school HL curriculum using qualitative and quantitative assessments. We sought to ground this in existing theory and provide evidence for generalizable use and further theory refinement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Across three medical student cohorts, HL was integrated into a 14-month pre-clinical professional development course. The longitudinal curriculum was informed by consensus-derived HL competencies and Bloom's Taxonomy. Student self-assessment and reflection data were linked across three timepoints and analyzed using mixed methods: an inductive approach identified key qualitative themes; exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified prevalent factors within self-assessments; and analysis of variance identified differences across timepoints.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Three qualitative themes emerged from student reflections: emotions associated with a backward reading exercise; shifts in awareness of HL as a patient challenge; and plans to continue using HL practices. Among 336 students with quantitative data across all timepoints, EFA identified three factors: foundations, shame-free environment, conveying information. Over the curriculum, students demonstrated significant (<i>p</i> < .05) improvements in each factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our longitudinal HL curriculum, grounded in existing competencies and conceptual framework, elicited positive changes related to medical student HL competencies. Qualitative data demonstrating motivation and intention to continue applying HL practices were augmented by quantitative data showing increased adoption of self-reported behaviors over curricular timepoints. This study fulfills multiple features of a conceptual framework for HL curricula in health professions education, including sequenced, interactive sessions, multiple instruction modes, reflection, integration of knowledge and skill education, and varied assessment methods. Our findings can be used by investigators, institutions, and professional accreditation organizations to broadly enhance HL education.</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"9 4","pages":"e122-e133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12680368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20250710-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite recommendations that medical schools incorporate health literacy (HL) into curricula and identification of consensus areas of HL competence, high-quality data are needed for curricular characteristics and structured evaluation that foster sustained HL competency adoption.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a comprehensive longitudinal medical school HL curriculum using qualitative and quantitative assessments. We sought to ground this in existing theory and provide evidence for generalizable use and further theory refinement.

Methods: Across three medical student cohorts, HL was integrated into a 14-month pre-clinical professional development course. The longitudinal curriculum was informed by consensus-derived HL competencies and Bloom's Taxonomy. Student self-assessment and reflection data were linked across three timepoints and analyzed using mixed methods: an inductive approach identified key qualitative themes; exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified prevalent factors within self-assessments; and analysis of variance identified differences across timepoints.

Key results: Three qualitative themes emerged from student reflections: emotions associated with a backward reading exercise; shifts in awareness of HL as a patient challenge; and plans to continue using HL practices. Among 336 students with quantitative data across all timepoints, EFA identified three factors: foundations, shame-free environment, conveying information. Over the curriculum, students demonstrated significant (p < .05) improvements in each factor.

Conclusions: Our longitudinal HL curriculum, grounded in existing competencies and conceptual framework, elicited positive changes related to medical student HL competencies. Qualitative data demonstrating motivation and intention to continue applying HL practices were augmented by quantitative data showing increased adoption of self-reported behaviors over curricular timepoints. This study fulfills multiple features of a conceptual framework for HL curricula in health professions education, including sequenced, interactive sessions, multiple instruction modes, reflection, integration of knowledge and skill education, and varied assessment methods. Our findings can be used by investigators, institutions, and professional accreditation organizations to broadly enhance HL education.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

纵向医学院校健康素养课程评价。
背景:尽管建议医学院将健康素养(HL)纳入课程,并确定HL能力的共识领域,但课程特征和结构化评估需要高质量的数据,以促进持续的HL能力采用。目的:本研究旨在利用定性和定量评估的方法,开发和评估综合纵向医学院校HL课程。我们试图在现有理论的基础上,为推广使用和进一步的理论完善提供证据。方法:在三个医科学生队列中,HL被纳入了一个为期14个月的临床前专业发展课程。纵向课程由共识衍生的HL能力和布鲁姆的分类法提供信息。学生自我评估和反思数据跨越三个时间点,并使用混合方法进行分析:归纳方法确定关键的定性主题;探索性因素分析(EFA)确定了自我评估中的流行因素;方差分析确定了不同时间点的差异。主要结果:学生反思中出现了三个定性主题:与向后阅读练习相关的情绪;将HL视为患者挑战的意识转变;并计划继续使用HL实践。在所有时间点的336名学生中,EFA确定了三个因素:基础、无羞耻的环境、传递信息。通过课程,学生在每个因素上都表现出显著的改善(p < 0.05)。结论:我们的纵向HL课程,以现有的能力和概念框架为基础,引发了医学生HL能力的积极变化。定性数据显示了继续应用HL实践的动机和意图,定量数据显示,在课程时间点上,自我报告行为的采用有所增加。本研究实现了卫生职业教育HL课程概念框架的多个特点,包括顺序化、互动化、多种教学模式、反思化、知识与技能教育一体化、评估方法多样化等。我们的研究结果可以被研究者、机构和专业认证组织用来广泛地加强HL教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书