Influence of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatments on T cell cytokine production in patients with inflammatory joint diseases - comparison of etanercept and anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies. A double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.26402/jpp.2025.5.03
A I Schramm-Luc, T P Mikolajczyk, M Siedlinski, B Jasiewicz-Honkisz, T Sliwa, B Batko, T J Guzik
{"title":"Influence of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatments on T cell cytokine production in patients with inflammatory joint diseases - comparison of etanercept and anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies. A double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled study.","authors":"A I Schramm-Luc, T P Mikolajczyk, M Siedlinski, B Jasiewicz-Honkisz, T Sliwa, B Batko, T J Guzik","doi":"10.26402/jpp.2025.5.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite similar clinical effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory joint diseases, they differ in effectiveness in other diseases and the exact mechanisms of their actions remain unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether TNF inhibitors - etanercept and monoclonal antibodies affect intracellular cytokine production by T cell subsets. Anti-TNF-naive patients with inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis), characterized by high disease activity, were treated with TNF inhibitor - etanercept (14 patients) or monoclonal antibody (16 patients) for 12 weeks, while 11 patients received placebo. At baseline, 4, and 12 weeks after introducing anti-TNF treatment, intracellular production of TNF, interferon gamma (IFNγ), interleukin 17A (IL-17A), and IL-4 by T cell subsets was assessed using flow cytometry and analyzed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA. There were no differences in TNF, IFNγ, or IL-4-positive CD4, CD8, and CD3<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>-</sup>CD8<sup>-</sup> (double negative, DN) cells between groups, neither while comparing effects of all TNF inhibitors jointly to placebo nor while analyzing effects in etanercept, monoclonal antibodies or placebo receiving groups. Similarly, there was no difference in IL-17A<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>+</sup> cells; however, a decrease in the percentage of IL-17A-positive DN T cells was observed in the etanercept-treated group (mean±SEM: 0.82±0.55, 0.41±0.16, 0.13±0.07) in comparison to placebo (0.23±0.10, 0.32±0.12, 0.49±0.15), (p=0.014), and an opposite; however, insignificant trend was observed in the monoclonal antibody-receiving group (0.41±0.13, 0.53±0.17, 0.82±0.3), (p=0.056 vs. etanercept). In summary, we ascertain that treatment with TNF inhibitors does not affect Th1, Th2, or Th17 responses. Etanercept and monoclonal antibodies differ in their effect on IL-17A+DN T cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":50089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":"76 5","pages":"509-523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26402/jpp.2025.5.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite similar clinical effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory joint diseases, they differ in effectiveness in other diseases and the exact mechanisms of their actions remain unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether TNF inhibitors - etanercept and monoclonal antibodies affect intracellular cytokine production by T cell subsets. Anti-TNF-naive patients with inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis), characterized by high disease activity, were treated with TNF inhibitor - etanercept (14 patients) or monoclonal antibody (16 patients) for 12 weeks, while 11 patients received placebo. At baseline, 4, and 12 weeks after introducing anti-TNF treatment, intracellular production of TNF, interferon gamma (IFNγ), interleukin 17A (IL-17A), and IL-4 by T cell subsets was assessed using flow cytometry and analyzed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA. There were no differences in TNF, IFNγ, or IL-4-positive CD4, CD8, and CD3+CD4-CD8- (double negative, DN) cells between groups, neither while comparing effects of all TNF inhibitors jointly to placebo nor while analyzing effects in etanercept, monoclonal antibodies or placebo receiving groups. Similarly, there was no difference in IL-17A+CD4+ cells; however, a decrease in the percentage of IL-17A-positive DN T cells was observed in the etanercept-treated group (mean±SEM: 0.82±0.55, 0.41±0.16, 0.13±0.07) in comparison to placebo (0.23±0.10, 0.32±0.12, 0.49±0.15), (p=0.014), and an opposite; however, insignificant trend was observed in the monoclonal antibody-receiving group (0.41±0.13, 0.53±0.17, 0.82±0.3), (p=0.056 vs. etanercept). In summary, we ascertain that treatment with TNF inhibitors does not affect Th1, Th2, or Th17 responses. Etanercept and monoclonal antibodies differ in their effect on IL-17A+DN T cells.

抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)治疗对炎性关节病患者T细胞细胞因子产生的影响——依那西普与抗TNF单克隆抗体的比较一项双盲、前瞻性、安慰剂对照研究。
尽管肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂治疗炎症性关节疾病的临床疗效相似,但它们在其他疾病中的疗效不同,其作用的确切机制尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定TNF抑制剂-依那西普和单克隆抗体是否影响T细胞亚群细胞内细胞因子的产生。以疾病活动性高为特征的炎症性关节炎(类风湿关节炎或脊椎关节炎)的抗TNF-naive患者接受TNF抑制剂依那西普(14例)或单克隆抗体(16例)治疗12周,而11例患者接受安慰剂治疗。在引入抗TNF治疗后的基线、4周和12周,使用流式细胞术评估T细胞亚群细胞内TNF、干扰素γ (IFNγ)、白细胞介素17A (IL-17A)和IL-4的产生,并通过重复测量的双向方差分析进行分析。两组之间TNF、IFNγ或il -4阳性CD4、CD8和CD3+CD4-CD8-(双阴性,DN)细胞没有差异,无论是在比较所有TNF抑制剂与安慰剂的联合作用时,还是在分析依那西普、单克隆抗体或安慰剂接受组的作用时。同样,IL-17A+CD4+细胞无差异;然而,与安慰剂(0.23±0.10,0.32±0.12,0.49±0.15)相比,依那西普治疗组il - 17a阳性DN T细胞的百分比下降(平均±SEM: 0.82±0.55,0.41±0.16,0.13±0.07),(p=0.014),反之;单克隆抗体接受组差异无统计学意义(0.41±0.13,0.53±0.17,0.82±0.3),与依那西普比较p=0.056。总之,我们确定使用TNF抑制剂治疗不会影响Th1、Th2或Th17反应。依那西普和单克隆抗体对IL-17A+DN T细胞的作用不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
22.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology publishes papers which fall within the range of basic and applied physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology. The papers should illustrate new physiological or pharmacological mechanisms at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs. Clinical studies, that are of fundamental importance and have a direct bearing on the pathophysiology will also be considered. Letters related to articles published in The Journal with topics of general professional interest are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书