A CDER perspective: Landscape of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) submitted in drug development programs

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.106007
Tyna Dao, Nakissa Sadrieh
{"title":"A CDER perspective: Landscape of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) submitted in drug development programs","authors":"Tyna Dao,&nbsp;Nakissa Sadrieh","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.106007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyzes the landscape of studies using New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and submitted to the FDA over the past 15 years. The study utilized a custom-developed Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) search tool to examine keywords in Module 4 of the Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) across various drug applications. The investigation focused on five NAM categories, including some of those identified in the 2022 Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act (FDORA): in vitro, in silico, in chemico, nonhuman in vivo, and other NAMs. Results indicated that 93 % of NAM submissions were concentrated in two categories: in silico (49 %) and in vitro (44 %), with other categories (including in chemico, nonhuman in vivo from phylogenetically lower species and other combined methods) demonstrating significantly lower representation. In vitro NAMs, including stem cell-derived and sandwich culture models, showed higher prevalence compared to 3D models and organ chip or MPS models. The relatively high prevalence of in silico NAMs, was due to the submission of multiple study reports per application, attributed to various metabolites and the use of different in silico platforms. In chemico and nonhuman in vivo NAMs demonstrated limited submissions, with zebrafish studies predominating in the latter category. This study highlights one of CDER's activities aimed at better understanding the current usage of NAMs in drug development, while providing evidence to support areas of focus and prioritization of resources towards the validation of NAMs with significant regulatory impact potential. Despite technical limitations in the datamining work presented here, the findings confirm that CDER has been receiving NAMs data in drug applications for a long time. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that industry submits only a fraction of their NAM data to FDA, therefore we encourage increased NAM submissions which would contribute to building scientific confidence in these methods. It is only through the availability of sufficient case studies, that CDER can move towards reaching the goals of NAMs Roadmap issued in April 2025, and ultimately phasing out animal studies when possible and feasible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106007"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025002399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes the landscape of studies using New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and submitted to the FDA over the past 15 years. The study utilized a custom-developed Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) search tool to examine keywords in Module 4 of the Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) across various drug applications. The investigation focused on five NAM categories, including some of those identified in the 2022 Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act (FDORA): in vitro, in silico, in chemico, nonhuman in vivo, and other NAMs. Results indicated that 93 % of NAM submissions were concentrated in two categories: in silico (49 %) and in vitro (44 %), with other categories (including in chemico, nonhuman in vivo from phylogenetically lower species and other combined methods) demonstrating significantly lower representation. In vitro NAMs, including stem cell-derived and sandwich culture models, showed higher prevalence compared to 3D models and organ chip or MPS models. The relatively high prevalence of in silico NAMs, was due to the submission of multiple study reports per application, attributed to various metabolites and the use of different in silico platforms. In chemico and nonhuman in vivo NAMs demonstrated limited submissions, with zebrafish studies predominating in the latter category. This study highlights one of CDER's activities aimed at better understanding the current usage of NAMs in drug development, while providing evidence to support areas of focus and prioritization of resources towards the validation of NAMs with significant regulatory impact potential. Despite technical limitations in the datamining work presented here, the findings confirm that CDER has been receiving NAMs data in drug applications for a long time. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that industry submits only a fraction of their NAM data to FDA, therefore we encourage increased NAM submissions which would contribute to building scientific confidence in these methods. It is only through the availability of sufficient case studies, that CDER can move towards reaching the goals of NAMs Roadmap issued in April 2025, and ultimately phasing out animal studies when possible and feasible.
CDER视角:新方法方法论(NAMs)在药物开发项目中的应用前景。
本研究分析了过去15年来使用新方法方法(NAMs)并提交给FDA的研究概况。该研究使用了一个定制的药物评估和研究中心(CDER)搜索工具来检查电子通用技术文档(eCTD)模块4中的关键词,涉及各种药物应用。调查的重点是五类不干化物质,包括《2022年食品和药物综合改革法案》(FDORA)中确定的一些:体外、硅、化学、非人类体内和其他不干化物质。结果表明,93%的不声不响提交集中在两个类别:在硅(49%)和体外(44%),与其他类别(包括在化学,非人体内从系统发育较低的物种和其他组合方法)显示显著较低的代表性。体外NAMs,包括干细胞衍生和三明治培养模型,与3D模型和器官芯片或MPS模型相比,显示出更高的患病率。计算机NAMs的相对较高的患病率是由于每个申请提交了多个研究报告,归因于各种代谢物和使用不同的计算机平台。在化学和非人类体内NAMs显示有限的提交,斑马鱼研究在后者类别中占主导地位。本研究强调了CDER的一项活动,旨在更好地了解NAMs在药物开发中的当前使用情况,同时为支持具有重大监管影响潜力的NAMs验证的重点领域和资源优先级提供证据。尽管这里提出的数据挖掘工作存在技术限制,但研究结果证实,CDER长期以来一直在药物申请中接收NAMs数据。尽管如此,我们承认工业界只向FDA提交了一小部分不运动数据,因此我们鼓励增加不运动提交,这将有助于建立对这些方法的科学信心。只有通过提供足够的案例研究,CDER才能朝着2025年4月发布的NAMs路线图的目标迈进,并最终在可能和可行的情况下逐步淘汰动物研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书