{"title":"A CDER perspective: Landscape of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) submitted in drug development programs","authors":"Tyna Dao, Nakissa Sadrieh","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.106007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyzes the landscape of studies using New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and submitted to the FDA over the past 15 years. The study utilized a custom-developed Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) search tool to examine keywords in Module 4 of the Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) across various drug applications. The investigation focused on five NAM categories, including some of those identified in the 2022 Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act (FDORA): in vitro, in silico, in chemico, nonhuman in vivo, and other NAMs. Results indicated that 93 % of NAM submissions were concentrated in two categories: in silico (49 %) and in vitro (44 %), with other categories (including in chemico, nonhuman in vivo from phylogenetically lower species and other combined methods) demonstrating significantly lower representation. In vitro NAMs, including stem cell-derived and sandwich culture models, showed higher prevalence compared to 3D models and organ chip or MPS models. The relatively high prevalence of in silico NAMs, was due to the submission of multiple study reports per application, attributed to various metabolites and the use of different in silico platforms. In chemico and nonhuman in vivo NAMs demonstrated limited submissions, with zebrafish studies predominating in the latter category. This study highlights one of CDER's activities aimed at better understanding the current usage of NAMs in drug development, while providing evidence to support areas of focus and prioritization of resources towards the validation of NAMs with significant regulatory impact potential. Despite technical limitations in the datamining work presented here, the findings confirm that CDER has been receiving NAMs data in drug applications for a long time. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that industry submits only a fraction of their NAM data to FDA, therefore we encourage increased NAM submissions which would contribute to building scientific confidence in these methods. It is only through the availability of sufficient case studies, that CDER can move towards reaching the goals of NAMs Roadmap issued in April 2025, and ultimately phasing out animal studies when possible and feasible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106007"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025002399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study analyzes the landscape of studies using New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and submitted to the FDA over the past 15 years. The study utilized a custom-developed Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) search tool to examine keywords in Module 4 of the Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) across various drug applications. The investigation focused on five NAM categories, including some of those identified in the 2022 Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act (FDORA): in vitro, in silico, in chemico, nonhuman in vivo, and other NAMs. Results indicated that 93 % of NAM submissions were concentrated in two categories: in silico (49 %) and in vitro (44 %), with other categories (including in chemico, nonhuman in vivo from phylogenetically lower species and other combined methods) demonstrating significantly lower representation. In vitro NAMs, including stem cell-derived and sandwich culture models, showed higher prevalence compared to 3D models and organ chip or MPS models. The relatively high prevalence of in silico NAMs, was due to the submission of multiple study reports per application, attributed to various metabolites and the use of different in silico platforms. In chemico and nonhuman in vivo NAMs demonstrated limited submissions, with zebrafish studies predominating in the latter category. This study highlights one of CDER's activities aimed at better understanding the current usage of NAMs in drug development, while providing evidence to support areas of focus and prioritization of resources towards the validation of NAMs with significant regulatory impact potential. Despite technical limitations in the datamining work presented here, the findings confirm that CDER has been receiving NAMs data in drug applications for a long time. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that industry submits only a fraction of their NAM data to FDA, therefore we encourage increased NAM submissions which would contribute to building scientific confidence in these methods. It is only through the availability of sufficient case studies, that CDER can move towards reaching the goals of NAMs Roadmap issued in April 2025, and ultimately phasing out animal studies when possible and feasible.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)