Efficacy and safety of selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors in uncontrolled hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 6.2 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-12-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5646/ch.2025.31.e41
Abdelaziz Louat, Mohammad Dwikat, Mohamedhen Vall Nounou, Salaheddin M Abdulhamid, Ali M Abdelaziz, Amr Ibrahim, Pierre Sabouret, Muhammed Elhadi
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors in uncontrolled hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Abdelaziz Louat, Mohammad Dwikat, Mohamedhen Vall Nounou, Salaheddin M Abdulhamid, Ali M Abdelaziz, Amr Ibrahim, Pierre Sabouret, Muhammed Elhadi","doi":"10.5646/ch.2025.31.e41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Earlier Aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs) were non-selective, with a risk of cortisol insufficiency. A new generation of ASIs has emerged with improved selectivity and pharmacological properties, although their efficacy and safety remain debated. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of selective ASIs in adults with uncontrolled primary hypertension. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 6 databases/registries, comparing selective ASIs with placebo in adults aged ≥ 18 years with primary uncontrolled hypertension. Quality was assessed using the risk of bias 2 tool. Random-effects models were used to pool mean differences for continuous variables and calculate odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes. Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Five RCTs, involving 2,456 patients, were included. Least-squares mean (LSM) systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly lower with ASIs than placebo in both standard-dose (difference in LSM [LSMD], -9.05 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.98 to -7.12; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and high-dose regimens (LSMD, -9.04 mmHg; 95% CI, -10.99 to -7.08; <i>P</i> < 0.001). LSM diastolic blood pressure was also significantly lower with ASIs using standard dose (LSMD, -3.54 mmHg; 95% CI, -4.99 to -2.09; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and high dose (LSMD, -4.17 mmHg; 95% CI, -5.72 to -2.62; <i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with placebo. For safety endpoints, mild hyperkalemia (5.5-6 mmol/L) was more frequent with ASIs at both standard dose (OR, 7.50; 95% CI, 2.46 to 22.85; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and high dose (OR, 11.63; 95% CI, 3.82 to 35.39; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The rate of moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia (greater than 6 mmol/L) was comparable between the ASI and placebo groups for standard doses. In contrast, high doses were associated with an increased rate in the ASI group (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.10 to 17.82; <i>P</i> = 0.036). The certainty of evidence was high for both SBP and mild hyperkalemia, and moderate for moderate to severe hyperkalemia. Selective ASIs appear to be a promising treatment in terms of efficacy and safety for uncontrolled hypertensive patients. Larger RCTs with extended follow-up periods are warranted to establish long-term evidence.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO Identifier: CRD420251108664.</p>","PeriodicalId":10480,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hypertension","volume":"31 ","pages":"e41"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12682404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5646/ch.2025.31.e41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earlier Aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs) were non-selective, with a risk of cortisol insufficiency. A new generation of ASIs has emerged with improved selectivity and pharmacological properties, although their efficacy and safety remain debated. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of selective ASIs in adults with uncontrolled primary hypertension. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 6 databases/registries, comparing selective ASIs with placebo in adults aged ≥ 18 years with primary uncontrolled hypertension. Quality was assessed using the risk of bias 2 tool. Random-effects models were used to pool mean differences for continuous variables and calculate odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes. Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Five RCTs, involving 2,456 patients, were included. Least-squares mean (LSM) systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly lower with ASIs than placebo in both standard-dose (difference in LSM [LSMD], -9.05 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.98 to -7.12; P < 0.001) and high-dose regimens (LSMD, -9.04 mmHg; 95% CI, -10.99 to -7.08; P < 0.001). LSM diastolic blood pressure was also significantly lower with ASIs using standard dose (LSMD, -3.54 mmHg; 95% CI, -4.99 to -2.09; P < 0.001) and high dose (LSMD, -4.17 mmHg; 95% CI, -5.72 to -2.62; P < 0.001) compared with placebo. For safety endpoints, mild hyperkalemia (5.5-6 mmol/L) was more frequent with ASIs at both standard dose (OR, 7.50; 95% CI, 2.46 to 22.85; P < 0.001) and high dose (OR, 11.63; 95% CI, 3.82 to 35.39; P < 0.001). The rate of moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia (greater than 6 mmol/L) was comparable between the ASI and placebo groups for standard doses. In contrast, high doses were associated with an increased rate in the ASI group (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.10 to 17.82; P = 0.036). The certainty of evidence was high for both SBP and mild hyperkalemia, and moderate for moderate to severe hyperkalemia. Selective ASIs appear to be a promising treatment in terms of efficacy and safety for uncontrolled hypertensive patients. Larger RCTs with extended follow-up periods are warranted to establish long-term evidence.

Trial registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD420251108664.

选择性醛固酮合成酶抑制剂治疗未控制高血压的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
早期醛固酮合成酶抑制剂(ASIs)是非选择性的,有皮质醇不足的风险。新一代的ASIs已经出现,具有更好的选择性和药理学特性,尽管它们的有效性和安全性仍然存在争议。本荟萃分析评估了选择性ASIs治疗未控制的原发性高血压的有效性和安全性。我们从6个数据库/登记处选择了随机对照试验(rct),比较了选择性ASIs和安慰剂在18岁以上原发性未控制高血压的成年人中的作用。使用风险偏倚2工具评估质量。随机效应模型用于汇总连续变量的平均差异,并计算二元结果的优势比(ORs)。证据的确定性采用建议分级评估、发展和评价方法进行评级。纳入5项随机对照试验,涉及2456例患者。在标准剂量组(LSM [LSMD],差异为-9.05 mmHg; 95%可信区间[CI], -10.98至-7.12;P < 0.001)和高剂量组(LSMD, -9.04 mmHg; 95% CI, -10.99至-7.08;P < 0.001), ASIs患者的收缩压(SBP)均显著低于安慰剂。与安慰剂相比,使用标准剂量(LSMD, -3.54 mmHg, 95% CI, -4.99至-2.09,P < 0.001)和高剂量(LSMD, -4.17 mmHg, 95% CI, -5.72至-2.62,P < 0.001)的ASIs患者LSM舒张压也显著降低。对于安全性终点,在标准剂量(OR, 7.50; 95% CI, 2.46至22.85;P < 0.001)和高剂量(OR, 11.63; 95% CI, 3.82至35.39;P < 0.001)下,轻度高钾血症(5.5-6 mmol/L)在ASIs患者中更常见。在标准剂量下,ASI组和安慰剂组中重度高钾血症(大于6 mmol/L)的发生率相当。相反,在ASI组中,高剂量与发生率增加相关(OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.10 ~ 17.82; P = 0.036)。收缩压和轻度高钾血症的证据确定性都很高,中度至重度高钾血症的证据确定性为中等。在疗效和安全性方面,选择性ASIs似乎是一种很有前途的治疗方法,用于不受控制的高血压患者。需要更大规模的随机对照试验,延长随访期,以建立长期证据。试验注册:PROSPERO标识符:CRD420251108664。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Hypertension
Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书