Identifying interhospital variation in hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome (HHS) care: development and outcomes of the DEKODE HHS model.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Tania M Kew, Aspasia Manta, Jhanvi Pravesh Sawlani, Amanda Ling Jie Yee, Amar Mann, Lakshmi Narayanan, Eleni Armeni, Gerry Rayman, Ketan Dhatariya, Punith Kempegowda
{"title":"Identifying interhospital variation in hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome (HHS) care: development and outcomes of the DEKODE HHS model.","authors":"Tania M Kew, Aspasia Manta, Jhanvi Pravesh Sawlani, Amanda Ling Jie Yee, Amar Mann, Lakshmi Narayanan, Eleni Armeni, Gerry Rayman, Ketan Dhatariya, Punith Kempegowda","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) is a life-threatening metabolic emergency with high mortality rate. Yet, there is no national system in the UK to monitor clinical practice or outcomes. To address this, we implemented and evaluated a multicenter surveillance system for HHS, assessing interhospital variations in management, outcomes, and barriers to guideline implementation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This mixed-methods observational study was conducted across 12 NHS hospitals between 2021 and 2024. A standardized data collection tool was developed, capturing demographics, biochemistry, treatment, and outcomes of HHS care. Adults meeting the Joint British Diabetes Societies criteria for HHS were included. Quantitative analyses were conducted to investigate care variations compared with guidelines among centers and identify predictors of HHS outcomes. In parallel, stakeholder interviews were analyzed thematically to explore implementation experiences. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework guided evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort, a total of 218 HHS episodes were included. Median patient age was 77 years; 84.4% had type 2 diabetes, with a high comorbidity burden. The median hospital stay was 10.3 days, and the mortality rate was 16.1%. Significant interhospital variation was observed in insulin dosing, glucose monitoring, and time to discharge. Multivariate analysis identified older age and elevated sodium as independent predictors of mortality. The Digital Evaluation of Ketosis and Other Diabetes Emergencies (DEKODE)-HHS model demonstrated feasibility, high user engagement, and potential for integration into routine quality improvement structures. Qualitative findings revealed barriers, including diagnostic misclassification and resource constraints, to the adoption of the DEKODE-HHS model. However, they also highlighted the educational impact and system usability once the model was adopted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DEKODE-HHS model represents the first UK multicenter surveillance initiative for HHS. It identifies variation in practice and outcome predictors while highlighting systemic barriers to guideline adherence. This model provides a scalable framework for continuous quality improvement in HHS management and may inform future updates to national guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12684118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) is a life-threatening metabolic emergency with high mortality rate. Yet, there is no national system in the UK to monitor clinical practice or outcomes. To address this, we implemented and evaluated a multicenter surveillance system for HHS, assessing interhospital variations in management, outcomes, and barriers to guideline implementation.

Research design and methods: This mixed-methods observational study was conducted across 12 NHS hospitals between 2021 and 2024. A standardized data collection tool was developed, capturing demographics, biochemistry, treatment, and outcomes of HHS care. Adults meeting the Joint British Diabetes Societies criteria for HHS were included. Quantitative analyses were conducted to investigate care variations compared with guidelines among centers and identify predictors of HHS outcomes. In parallel, stakeholder interviews were analyzed thematically to explore implementation experiences. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework guided evaluation.

Results: In our cohort, a total of 218 HHS episodes were included. Median patient age was 77 years; 84.4% had type 2 diabetes, with a high comorbidity burden. The median hospital stay was 10.3 days, and the mortality rate was 16.1%. Significant interhospital variation was observed in insulin dosing, glucose monitoring, and time to discharge. Multivariate analysis identified older age and elevated sodium as independent predictors of mortality. The Digital Evaluation of Ketosis and Other Diabetes Emergencies (DEKODE)-HHS model demonstrated feasibility, high user engagement, and potential for integration into routine quality improvement structures. Qualitative findings revealed barriers, including diagnostic misclassification and resource constraints, to the adoption of the DEKODE-HHS model. However, they also highlighted the educational impact and system usability once the model was adopted.

Conclusions: The DEKODE-HHS model represents the first UK multicenter surveillance initiative for HHS. It identifies variation in practice and outcome predictors while highlighting systemic barriers to guideline adherence. This model provides a scalable framework for continuous quality improvement in HHS management and may inform future updates to national guidance.

确定高渗性高血糖综合征(HHS)护理的医院间差异:DEKODE HHS模型的发展和结果
简介:高渗性高血糖症(HHS)是一种危及生命的代谢急症,死亡率高。然而,英国没有一个全国性的系统来监测临床实践或结果。为了解决这个问题,我们实施并评估了HHS的多中心监测系统,评估了医院间在管理、结果和指南实施障碍方面的差异。研究设计和方法:这项混合方法的观察性研究于2021年至2024年间在12家NHS医院进行。开发了一种标准化的数据收集工具,收集人口统计学、生物化学、治疗和卫生与公众服务部护理的结果。符合英国糖尿病协会HHS标准的成年人也包括在内。进行定量分析,以调查各中心与指南相比的护理差异,并确定HHS结果的预测因素。与此同时,对涉众访谈进行了主题分析,以探索实现经验。可及性、有效性、采用、实施、维护框架指导评估。结果:在我们的队列中,总共纳入了218例HHS发作。患者中位年龄为77岁;84.4%的患者患有2型糖尿病,合并症负担高。中位住院时间为10.3天,死亡率为16.1%。在胰岛素剂量、血糖监测和出院时间方面,各医院之间存在显著差异。多变量分析表明,年龄增大和钠含量升高是死亡率的独立预测因素。酮症和其他糖尿病紧急情况的数字评估(DEKODE)-HHS模型证明了可行性、高用户参与度和整合到常规质量改进结构中的潜力。定性研究结果揭示了采用DEKODE-HHS模型的障碍,包括诊断错误分类和资源限制。然而,他们也强调了一旦采用该模型的教育影响和系统可用性。结论:DEKODE-HHS模型代表了英国首个针对HHS的多中心监测倡议。它确定了实践中的变化和结果预测因素,同时强调了指南遵守的系统性障碍。该模式为卫生与公众服务部管理的持续质量改进提供了一个可扩展的框架,并可能为今后更新国家指南提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书