Amiloride: revisiting an old drug for resistant hypertension.

IF 6.2 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-12-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5646/ch.2025.31.e42
Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park
{"title":"Amiloride: revisiting an old drug for resistant hypertension.","authors":"Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park","doi":"10.5646/ch.2025.31.e42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resistant hypertension (RH) remains a major clinical challenge, defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite the use of 3 antihypertensive agents, including a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic, or the need for 4 or more agents. Spironolactone has been considered the most effective fourth-line therapy, supported by the PATHWAY-2 trial, but its real-world use is limited by adverse effects such as gynecomastia, menstrual irregularities, and hyperkalemia. Therefore, there was a clinical need for alternative agents, and thus the use of amiloride, an epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) inhibitor and potassium-sparing diuretic, has been proposed. Data from PATHWAY-2 suggested amiloride's comparable BP-lowering efficacy, though based only on an open-label extension. Recently, the SPironolactone versus Amiloride for REsistant hypertension (SPARE) trial provided the first randomized evidence directly comparing the 2 agents. In 118 patients with RH inadequately controlled on fixed-dose triple therapy, participants were randomized to spironolactone 12-25 mg or amiloride 5-10 mg for 12 weeks. Mean reductions in home systolic blood pressure (SBP) were -14.7 mmHg with spironolactone and -13.6 mmHg with amiloride, meeting the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Safety profiles were favorable, with only one discontinuation due to hyperkalemia in the amiloride group and no reports of gynecomastia. Subgroup analyses suggested greater efficacy of amiloride in patients with higher body mass index and lower aldosterone-renin ratios, highlighting a potentially distinct mechanism of action. Unlike spironolactone, whose efficacy correlated with aldosterone activity, amiloride showed consistent SBP reduction across renin and aldosterone levels. Beyond its renal ENaC inhibition, amiloride may also modulate vascular biology. In addition to its inhibition of renal ENaCs, amiloride may also have an impact on vascular biology. Experimental studies indicate that ENaC is present in endothelial cells, where its activation can lead to reduced nitric oxide release, increased oxidative stress, endothelial stiffness, and vascular fibrosis. Amiloride may consistently lower BP across a wide range of renin-aldosterone activity by improving endothelial function through the inhibition of ENaC, as well as by decreasing intravascular volume. The findings from the SPARE trial suggest that amiloride may be a viable alternative to spironolactone for RH, particularly in patients who are intolerant to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. While spironolactone remains the preferred option due to its established role in blocking systemic aldosterone activation and proven cardiovascular benefits, amiloride can provide a practical and well-tolerated alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":10480,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hypertension","volume":"31 ","pages":"e42"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12682400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5646/ch.2025.31.e42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resistant hypertension (RH) remains a major clinical challenge, defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite the use of 3 antihypertensive agents, including a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic, or the need for 4 or more agents. Spironolactone has been considered the most effective fourth-line therapy, supported by the PATHWAY-2 trial, but its real-world use is limited by adverse effects such as gynecomastia, menstrual irregularities, and hyperkalemia. Therefore, there was a clinical need for alternative agents, and thus the use of amiloride, an epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) inhibitor and potassium-sparing diuretic, has been proposed. Data from PATHWAY-2 suggested amiloride's comparable BP-lowering efficacy, though based only on an open-label extension. Recently, the SPironolactone versus Amiloride for REsistant hypertension (SPARE) trial provided the first randomized evidence directly comparing the 2 agents. In 118 patients with RH inadequately controlled on fixed-dose triple therapy, participants were randomized to spironolactone 12-25 mg or amiloride 5-10 mg for 12 weeks. Mean reductions in home systolic blood pressure (SBP) were -14.7 mmHg with spironolactone and -13.6 mmHg with amiloride, meeting the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Safety profiles were favorable, with only one discontinuation due to hyperkalemia in the amiloride group and no reports of gynecomastia. Subgroup analyses suggested greater efficacy of amiloride in patients with higher body mass index and lower aldosterone-renin ratios, highlighting a potentially distinct mechanism of action. Unlike spironolactone, whose efficacy correlated with aldosterone activity, amiloride showed consistent SBP reduction across renin and aldosterone levels. Beyond its renal ENaC inhibition, amiloride may also modulate vascular biology. In addition to its inhibition of renal ENaCs, amiloride may also have an impact on vascular biology. Experimental studies indicate that ENaC is present in endothelial cells, where its activation can lead to reduced nitric oxide release, increased oxidative stress, endothelial stiffness, and vascular fibrosis. Amiloride may consistently lower BP across a wide range of renin-aldosterone activity by improving endothelial function through the inhibition of ENaC, as well as by decreasing intravascular volume. The findings from the SPARE trial suggest that amiloride may be a viable alternative to spironolactone for RH, particularly in patients who are intolerant to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. While spironolactone remains the preferred option due to its established role in blocking systemic aldosterone activation and proven cardiovascular benefits, amiloride can provide a practical and well-tolerated alternative.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阿米洛利:一种治疗顽固性高血压的老药。
顽固性高血压(RH)仍然是一个主要的临床挑战,定义为尽管使用了3种降压药,包括肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂、钙通道阻滞剂和利尿剂,或需要4种或更多药物,但血压(BP)仍未控制。在PATHWAY-2试验的支持下,螺内酯被认为是最有效的第四线治疗药物,但其在现实世界中的使用受到诸如男性乳房发育、月经不规律和高钾血症等副作用的限制。因此,临床需要替代药物,因此建议使用阿米洛利,一种上皮钠通道(ENaC)抑制剂和保钾利尿剂。来自PATHWAY-2的数据表明amiloride具有类似的降压效果,尽管仅基于开放标签扩展。最近,螺内酯与阿米洛利治疗难治性高血压(SPARE)试验提供了第一个直接比较这两种药物的随机证据。在118例RH患者中,固定剂量三联治疗控制不充分,参与者被随机分配到螺内酯12- 25mg或阿米洛利5- 10mg,持续12周。使用螺内酯和阿米洛利的家庭收缩压(SBP)平均降低值分别为-14.7 mmHg和-13.6 mmHg,符合预先规定的非劣效性界限。安全性良好,在阿米洛利组中只有一例因高钾血症而停药,没有男性乳房发育的报告。亚组分析表明,阿米洛利对体重指数较高、醛固酮-肾素比值较低的患者疗效更好,这突出了一种潜在的独特作用机制。与螺内酯(其疗效与醛固酮活性相关)不同,阿米洛利在肾素和醛固酮水平下均显示出一致的收缩压降低。除了对肾ENaC的抑制作用外,阿米洛利还可以调节血管生物学。除了对肾ENaCs的抑制作用外,阿米洛利还可能对血管生物学产生影响。实验研究表明,ENaC存在于内皮细胞中,其激活可导致一氧化氮释放减少,氧化应激增加,内皮僵硬和血管纤维化。阿米洛利可能通过抑制ENaC改善内皮功能,以及通过减少血管内体积,在大范围内持续降低肾素醛固酮活性。SPARE试验的结果表明,阿米洛利可能是RH治疗中螺内酯的可行替代品,特别是对矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂不耐受的患者。由于螺内酯在阻断全身醛固酮激活和心血管方面的作用,它仍然是首选,阿米洛利可以提供一个实用且耐受性良好的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Hypertension
Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书