Placing Rural in the National Disability Insurance Scheme Review

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Claire Quilliam, Luke Wakely, Louise French, Natalie Ellis, Robyn McNeil, Tony Fallon, Michelle Kersten, Kerryn Bagley, Jo Spong, Robyn Doney, Casey Stubbs, Alison Devitt, Carol McKinstry
{"title":"Placing Rural in the National Disability Insurance Scheme Review","authors":"Claire Quilliam,&nbsp;Luke Wakely,&nbsp;Louise French,&nbsp;Natalie Ellis,&nbsp;Robyn McNeil,&nbsp;Tony Fallon,&nbsp;Michelle Kersten,&nbsp;Kerryn Bagley,&nbsp;Jo Spong,&nbsp;Robyn Doney,&nbsp;Casey Stubbs,&nbsp;Alison Devitt,&nbsp;Carol McKinstry","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The National Disability Insurance Scheme is considered Australia's landmark disability support policy reform. The Scheme's implementation has revealed several benefits but also critical shortcomings. The Scheme's benefits have not been equitably distributed with people living in regional, rural and remote areas receiving less. The Australian Government's Independent Review into the National Disability Insurance Scheme in 2023 provided recommendations for improvements to ensure equitable benefits for all Australians. We use a distributed rural proofing lens to explore how processes, recommendations and actions described in the Independent Review into the National Disability Insurance Scheme considered regional, rural and remote contexts. The Review offered ideas for improving services for regional, rural and remote people with disability; however, it failed to adequately consider these contexts. The Independent Review into the National Disability Insurance Scheme missed a key opportunity to rural proof Australian disability support policy. Future disability policymaking requires active engagement of regional, rural and remote people with disability and use of relevant service provision concepts to ensure regional, rural and remote people with disability equitably benefit from the National Disability Insurance Scheme.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 4","pages":"1077-1083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National Disability Insurance Scheme is considered Australia's landmark disability support policy reform. The Scheme's implementation has revealed several benefits but also critical shortcomings. The Scheme's benefits have not been equitably distributed with people living in regional, rural and remote areas receiving less. The Australian Government's Independent Review into the National Disability Insurance Scheme in 2023 provided recommendations for improvements to ensure equitable benefits for all Australians. We use a distributed rural proofing lens to explore how processes, recommendations and actions described in the Independent Review into the National Disability Insurance Scheme considered regional, rural and remote contexts. The Review offered ideas for improving services for regional, rural and remote people with disability; however, it failed to adequately consider these contexts. The Independent Review into the National Disability Insurance Scheme missed a key opportunity to rural proof Australian disability support policy. Future disability policymaking requires active engagement of regional, rural and remote people with disability and use of relevant service provision concepts to ensure regional, rural and remote people with disability equitably benefit from the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

农村残疾人纳入国家残疾保险制度研究述评
国家残疾保险计划被认为是澳大利亚具有里程碑意义的残疾支持政策改革。该计划的实施显示了一些好处,但也有严重的缺点。该计划的福利分配不公平,居住在区域、农村和偏远地区的人获得的福利较少。澳大利亚政府在2023年对国家残疾保险计划进行的独立审查提出了改进建议,以确保所有澳大利亚人获得公平的福利。我们使用分布式农村证明镜头来探索国家残疾保险计划独立审查中所描述的过程,建议和行动如何考虑区域,农村和偏远环境。《审查报告》提出了改进对区域、农村和偏远地区残疾人的服务的想法;但是,它没有充分考虑到这些情况。对国家残疾保险计划的独立审查错过了一个证明澳大利亚农村残疾支持政策的关键机会。未来的残疾政策制定需要地区、农村和偏远地区的残疾人积极参与,并使用相关的服务提供概念,以确保地区、农村和偏远地区的残疾人公平地从国家残疾保险计划中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书