A scoping review of non-binary research in “Australian” social sciences: Community, solidarity, resilience and resisting marginalisation

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Lucy Nicholas, Sal Clark, Chloe Falzon
{"title":"A scoping review of non-binary research in “Australian” social sciences: Community, solidarity, resilience and resisting marginalisation","authors":"Lucy Nicholas,&nbsp;Sal Clark,&nbsp;Chloe Falzon","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Non-binary and genderqueer identities are increasingly discussed in public discourse and academia, but there remains a dearth of academic literature centred on non-binary people's lives and experiences. When non-binary people are included in research, it is frequently as an additive to explorations of trans identities and subsumed under the trans umbrella or treated as categorically indistinct. Much has been written from a clinical perspective, but the social sciences tend to discuss non-binary identity conceptually or as a proxy in theoretical arguments. Of the emerging sociological literature on non-binary identity, much is from the United States or the United Kingdom. Thus, this scoping review engaged with the corpus of research on non-binary people in “Australia” to consider social change and policy needs. We found much about the negative health impacts resulting from discrimination and barriers, emphasising the structural and systemic nature of the existing gender binary. However, the majority of these papers include a focus on how non-binary people actively participate in the collective creation of community, identity and safe spaces for affirmation. Resilience, coping strategies and solidarity were key themes and offer important insights into how the barriers identified can be ameliorated.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 4","pages":"971-987"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.374","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-binary and genderqueer identities are increasingly discussed in public discourse and academia, but there remains a dearth of academic literature centred on non-binary people's lives and experiences. When non-binary people are included in research, it is frequently as an additive to explorations of trans identities and subsumed under the trans umbrella or treated as categorically indistinct. Much has been written from a clinical perspective, but the social sciences tend to discuss non-binary identity conceptually or as a proxy in theoretical arguments. Of the emerging sociological literature on non-binary identity, much is from the United States or the United Kingdom. Thus, this scoping review engaged with the corpus of research on non-binary people in “Australia” to consider social change and policy needs. We found much about the negative health impacts resulting from discrimination and barriers, emphasising the structural and systemic nature of the existing gender binary. However, the majority of these papers include a focus on how non-binary people actively participate in the collective creation of community, identity and safe spaces for affirmation. Resilience, coping strategies and solidarity were key themes and offer important insights into how the barriers identified can be ameliorated.

Abstract Image

“澳大利亚”社会科学非二元研究的范围审查:社区,团结,弹性和抵制边缘化
非二元和性别酷儿身份越来越多地在公共话语和学术界被讨论,但仍然缺乏以非二元人群的生活和经历为中心的学术文献。当非二元性别的人被纳入研究时,它经常被作为对跨性别身份的探索的补充,被归入跨性别的保护伞下,或者被视为完全不明确。从临床角度写了很多,但社会科学倾向于从概念上或作为理论论证的代理来讨论非二元身份。在关于非二元身份的新兴社会学文献中,许多来自美国或英国。因此,本范围审查涉及“澳大利亚”非二元人群的研究语料库,以考虑社会变革和政策需求。我们发现了歧视和障碍对健康造成的负面影响,强调了现有二元性别的结构性和系统性。然而,这些论文中的大多数都关注非二元性别的人如何积极参与社区、身份和安全空间的集体创造。复原力、应对策略和团结是关键主题,为如何改善已确定的障碍提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书