Prompt-Based Learning for Factual Knowledge Infusion in Large Language Models

Q2 Decision Sciences
Ziheng Cheng;Yiming Cao
{"title":"Prompt-Based Learning for Factual Knowledge Infusion in Large Language Models","authors":"Ziheng Cheng;Yiming Cao","doi":"10.26599/IJCS.2025.9100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in knowledge-intensive tasks but often struggle to effectively apply infused knowledge due to textual-structure mismatches between the infusion and reasoning phases. To address this issue, we propose a prompt-based unification strategy that directly learns from factual triples in knowledge graphs while preserving structural consistency across both phases. This unified design enables seamless transfer of factual knowledge to downstream reasoning tasks without requiring architectural modifications. Extensive experiments on two Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) benchmarks, WebQSP and MetaQA, demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms strong baselines. Further ablation and robustness analyses verify that structural unification is the key factor driving the improvements, while its compatibility with adapter-tuning and LoRA highlights practical applicability under parameter-efficient fine-tuning settings. Overall, our results suggest that enforcing textual structural consistency provides a simple yet effective principle for reliable knowledge infusion in LLMs, with broad potential across diverse knowledge-intensive domains.","PeriodicalId":32381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Crowd Science","volume":"9 4","pages":"262-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11293174","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Crowd Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11293174/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in knowledge-intensive tasks but often struggle to effectively apply infused knowledge due to textual-structure mismatches between the infusion and reasoning phases. To address this issue, we propose a prompt-based unification strategy that directly learns from factual triples in knowledge graphs while preserving structural consistency across both phases. This unified design enables seamless transfer of factual knowledge to downstream reasoning tasks without requiring architectural modifications. Extensive experiments on two Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) benchmarks, WebQSP and MetaQA, demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms strong baselines. Further ablation and robustness analyses verify that structural unification is the key factor driving the improvements, while its compatibility with adapter-tuning and LoRA highlights practical applicability under parameter-efficient fine-tuning settings. Overall, our results suggest that enforcing textual structural consistency provides a simple yet effective principle for reliable knowledge infusion in LLMs, with broad potential across diverse knowledge-intensive domains.
大型语言模型中基于提示的事实知识灌输学习
大型语言模型(llm)越来越多地用于知识密集型任务,但由于注入阶段和推理阶段之间的文本结构不匹配,往往难以有效地应用注入的知识。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种基于提示的统一策略,该策略直接从知识图中的事实三元组中学习,同时保持两个阶段之间的结构一致性。这种统一的设计可以无缝地将事实知识转移到下游的推理任务,而不需要对架构进行修改。在WebQSP和MetaQA两个知识图谱问答(KGQA)基准上进行的大量实验表明,我们的方法始终优于强基线。进一步的消融和鲁棒性分析验证了结构统一是推动改进的关键因素,而其与适配器调谐和LoRA的兼容性突出了在参数高效微调设置下的实际适用性。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,强制文本结构一致性为法学硕士的可靠知识注入提供了一个简单而有效的原则,在不同的知识密集型领域具有广泛的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Crowd Science
International Journal of Crowd Science Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书