A cross-cultural comparative study of language learning applications for self-regulated language learning: Insights from mainland China, the UK, and the US

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Ampersand Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.amper.2025.100246
Noble Lo , Yuming Chang
{"title":"A cross-cultural comparative study of language learning applications for self-regulated language learning: Insights from mainland China, the UK, and the US","authors":"Noble Lo ,&nbsp;Yuming Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.amper.2025.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study comprises a cross-cultural comparative study of the ways in which foreign-language learners regard and use language learning applications (LLAs) as part of their strategy of language acquisition. Through providing questionnaires and undertaking interviews with language learners at universities across mainland China, the United Kingdom and United States of America, the study seeks to understand how factors such as motivations behind learning languages, attitudes towards language learning applications, and confidence in self-regulated learning skills can impact outcomes such as application choice and time spent using language learning applications. On the basis of survey responses from 1298 students and interviews with some 30 of this number, the study notes a number of conclusions pertinent to its aims. It highlights important differences in how students from China, the UK and USA use LLAs for self-regulated language learning, particularly between the Chinese context and Anglophonic contexts. Chinese students favour applications that facilitate the structured delivery of content reflecting predetermined goals, whereas English and American students favour applications that offer more flexibility and personalised feedback. Motivations also vary, with Chinese students prioritising professional development and certification, whilst British and American students value personal growth and cultural appreciation. Identified challenges also differ, with Chinese users struggling to comprehend written content – prioritising written comprehension over other competencies – and confidence in SRL, whilst British and American users are often frustrated with repetitive content, a lack of sufficient personalisation, and insufficient opportunities for practising speaking and listening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35076,"journal":{"name":"Ampersand","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ampersand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221503902500030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study comprises a cross-cultural comparative study of the ways in which foreign-language learners regard and use language learning applications (LLAs) as part of their strategy of language acquisition. Through providing questionnaires and undertaking interviews with language learners at universities across mainland China, the United Kingdom and United States of America, the study seeks to understand how factors such as motivations behind learning languages, attitudes towards language learning applications, and confidence in self-regulated learning skills can impact outcomes such as application choice and time spent using language learning applications. On the basis of survey responses from 1298 students and interviews with some 30 of this number, the study notes a number of conclusions pertinent to its aims. It highlights important differences in how students from China, the UK and USA use LLAs for self-regulated language learning, particularly between the Chinese context and Anglophonic contexts. Chinese students favour applications that facilitate the structured delivery of content reflecting predetermined goals, whereas English and American students favour applications that offer more flexibility and personalised feedback. Motivations also vary, with Chinese students prioritising professional development and certification, whilst British and American students value personal growth and cultural appreciation. Identified challenges also differ, with Chinese users struggling to comprehend written content – prioritising written comprehension over other competencies – and confidence in SRL, whilst British and American users are often frustrated with repetitive content, a lack of sufficient personalisation, and insufficient opportunities for practising speaking and listening.
自主语言学习中语言学习应用的跨文化比较研究:来自中国大陆、英国和美国的见解
本研究是一项跨文化比较研究,探讨外语学习者如何看待和使用语言学习应用程序作为语言习得策略的一部分。通过对中国大陆、英国和美国大学的语言学习者进行问卷调查和访谈,本研究旨在了解学习语言背后的动机、对语言学习应用的态度以及对自我调节学习技能的信心等因素如何影响应用程序选择和使用语言学习应用程序的时间等结果。根据对1298名学生的调查和对其中30名学生的采访,该研究得出了一些与其目标相关的结论。它强调了来自中国、英国和美国的学生如何使用LLAs进行自我调节的语言学习的重要差异,特别是在中国环境和英语环境之间。中国学生更喜欢那些能够结构化地传递反映预定目标的内容的应用程序,而英国和美国学生则更喜欢那些提供更灵活和个性化反馈的应用程序。动机也各不相同,中国学生优先考虑专业发展和认证,而英国和美国学生更重视个人成长和文化欣赏。所确定的挑战也有所不同,中国用户努力理解书面内容-优先考虑书面理解而不是其他能力-以及对SRL的信心,而英国和美国用户经常对重复的内容感到沮丧,缺乏足够的个性化,缺乏练习口语和听力的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ampersand
Ampersand Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书