Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience (RReHOPE): study synopsis.

Erica Gadsby, Emma King, Madeline Bell, Geoff Wong, Sally Kendall
{"title":"Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience (RReHOPE): study synopsis.","authors":"Erica Gadsby, Emma King, Madeline Bell, Geoff Wong, Sally Kendall","doi":"10.3310/GJEG0402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted and, in some cases, transformed the way health visiting teams work, the way they interact with families and children and with the wider community and other service providers. Health visiting services are organised, delivered and experienced differently in different places, with little evidence to suggest what works best, for whom and in what contexts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesise the evidence on changes during the pandemic to identify the potential for improving health visiting services and their delivery in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This realist review engaged professional stakeholders (<i>N</i> = 28) and those caring for babies during the pandemic (<i>N</i> = 6) throughout the process. We searched five electronic databases for publications on health visiting during the COVID-19 pandemic from October 2022 to April 2023. This was followed by citation searching and review of organisational websites. Programme theory was iteratively refined through discussions with the team, professional stakeholders and people with lived experience and was translated into key findings and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighteen documents informed this review; most focused on health visiting in England (56%) or the United Kingdom (34%), with relatively few from Wales (6%), Scotland (3%) and Northern Ireland (1%). Documents highlighted the widespread, uneven and lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on babies and families. Findings revealed significant concerns expressed by both families and practitioners and corresponding actions taken by health visiting services. These concerns and responses emphasised the flexibility and resourcefulness of health visitors, the vital role of trusting relationships between health visitors and families and the importance of holistic assessments for early intervention. Changes in service delivery were varied and were not always evaluated or sustainable. While the data illuminated some of the hidden complexities of health visiting practice, limited evidence was found on decision-making at organisational and managerial levels during the pandemic response.</p><p><strong>Evidence limitations: </strong>Included papers were predominantly from an advocacy or practitioner perspective, and few focused on health visiting in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Our focus on the universal health visiting pathways meant that documents pertaining to additional support received by the most vulnerable families might have been excluded. Experiences of Black, Asian and minority ethnic families and staff were illustrated in several papers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the essential role of health visitors in safeguarding child and family well-being in the United Kingdom. While digital adaptations provide necessary continuity, face-to-face interactions remain essential for effective health visiting. The crisis exposed pre-existing workforce pressures and inconsistencies in service provision, emphasising the need for adequate support and funding. Policy-makers must recognise the complexity of health visiting and ensure sustained investment in universal home visiting services. Future resilience requires a realistic understanding of health visitors' work, integration into broader child health policies and enhanced interagency collaboration to address inequalities and improve long-term public health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Our implications for policy-makers will be translated into reflexive questions to prompt critical thinking about health visiting services in local areas. The small number of documents from countries outside England highlights this as a key area for future research.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR134986.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 42","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/GJEG0402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted and, in some cases, transformed the way health visiting teams work, the way they interact with families and children and with the wider community and other service providers. Health visiting services are organised, delivered and experienced differently in different places, with little evidence to suggest what works best, for whom and in what contexts.

Objective: To synthesise the evidence on changes during the pandemic to identify the potential for improving health visiting services and their delivery in the United Kingdom.

Methods: This realist review engaged professional stakeholders (N = 28) and those caring for babies during the pandemic (N = 6) throughout the process. We searched five electronic databases for publications on health visiting during the COVID-19 pandemic from October 2022 to April 2023. This was followed by citation searching and review of organisational websites. Programme theory was iteratively refined through discussions with the team, professional stakeholders and people with lived experience and was translated into key findings and recommendations.

Results: One hundred and eighteen documents informed this review; most focused on health visiting in England (56%) or the United Kingdom (34%), with relatively few from Wales (6%), Scotland (3%) and Northern Ireland (1%). Documents highlighted the widespread, uneven and lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on babies and families. Findings revealed significant concerns expressed by both families and practitioners and corresponding actions taken by health visiting services. These concerns and responses emphasised the flexibility and resourcefulness of health visitors, the vital role of trusting relationships between health visitors and families and the importance of holistic assessments for early intervention. Changes in service delivery were varied and were not always evaluated or sustainable. While the data illuminated some of the hidden complexities of health visiting practice, limited evidence was found on decision-making at organisational and managerial levels during the pandemic response.

Evidence limitations: Included papers were predominantly from an advocacy or practitioner perspective, and few focused on health visiting in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Our focus on the universal health visiting pathways meant that documents pertaining to additional support received by the most vulnerable families might have been excluded. Experiences of Black, Asian and minority ethnic families and staff were illustrated in several papers.

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the essential role of health visitors in safeguarding child and family well-being in the United Kingdom. While digital adaptations provide necessary continuity, face-to-face interactions remain essential for effective health visiting. The crisis exposed pre-existing workforce pressures and inconsistencies in service provision, emphasising the need for adequate support and funding. Policy-makers must recognise the complexity of health visiting and ensure sustained investment in universal home visiting services. Future resilience requires a realistic understanding of health visitors' work, integration into broader child health policies and enhanced interagency collaboration to address inequalities and improve long-term public health outcomes.

Future work: Our implications for policy-makers will be translated into reflexive questions to prompt critical thinking about health visiting services in local areas. The small number of documents from countries outside England highlights this as a key area for future research.

Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR134986.

基于COVID-19大流行经验的英国健康访问(RReHOPE):研究摘要。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行中断并在某些情况下改变了卫生访问团队的工作方式,以及他们与家庭和儿童以及更广泛的社区和其他服务提供者的互动方式。在不同的地方,保健访问服务的组织、提供和体验各不相同,几乎没有证据表明哪种方式最有效,对谁最有效,在什么情况下最有效。目的:综合大流行期间变化的证据,以确定改善联合王国健康访问服务及其提供的潜力。方法:这一现实主义综述在整个过程中涉及专业利益相关者(N = 28)和大流行期间照顾婴儿的人员(N = 6)。我们检索了五个电子数据库,检索了2022年10月至2023年4月COVID-19大流行期间的健康访问出版物。其次是引文搜索和组织网站的审查。通过与团队、专业利益相关者和有实际经验的人的讨论,不断完善项目理论,并将其转化为关键的发现和建议。结果:本次综述涉及118份文献;大多数集中在英格兰(56%)或联合王国(34%),威尔士(6%)、苏格兰(3%)和北爱尔兰(1%)的访视相对较少。文件强调了COVID-19大流行对婴儿和家庭的广泛、不平衡和持久影响。调查结果显示,家庭和医生都表达了严重的关切,保健访问服务机构也采取了相应的行动。这些关切和答复强调保健访视者的灵活性和足智多谋、保健访视者与家庭之间信任关系的重要作用以及全面评估对早期干预的重要性。服务提供方面的变化各不相同,并不总是得到评价或可持续。虽然这些数据揭示了卫生访问实践中隐藏的一些复杂性,但在大流行应对期间,在组织和管理层面的决策方面发现的证据有限。证据限制:纳入的论文主要来自倡导或从业者的角度,很少关注苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰的保健访问。我们将重点放在全民健康访问途径上,这意味着与最脆弱家庭获得的额外支持有关的文件可能被排除在外。几篇论文阐述了黑人、亚洲人和少数族裔家庭和工作人员的经历。结论:2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了卫生巡视员在保障英国儿童和家庭福祉方面的重要作用。虽然数字化调整提供了必要的连续性,但面对面的互动对于有效的卫生访问仍然至关重要。危机暴露了先前存在的劳动力压力和服务提供方面的不一致,强调了对充分支持和资金的需求。决策者必须认识到保健访问的复杂性,并确保对普遍家访服务的持续投资。未来的复原力需要现实地了解卫生巡视员的工作,将其纳入更广泛的儿童保健政策,并加强机构间合作,以解决不平等问题,改善长期的公共卫生成果。未来工作:我们对政策制定者的启示将转化为反思性问题,以促进对当地卫生访问服务的批判性思考。来自英国以外国家的少量文件突出了这是未来研究的关键领域。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR134986。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书