Implementing SINC (Self-Identified Need for Contraception) screening: A mixed methods case study

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Contraception Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111315
Lisa LeRoy , Linda Chamiec-Case , Michela Garrison , Madeline Mador , Laura Perez , Kirsten Meisinger , Samantha Fox
{"title":"Implementing SINC (Self-Identified Need for Contraception) screening: A mixed methods case study","authors":"Lisa LeRoy ,&nbsp;Linda Chamiec-Case ,&nbsp;Michela Garrison ,&nbsp;Madeline Mador ,&nbsp;Laura Perez ,&nbsp;Kirsten Meisinger ,&nbsp;Samantha Fox","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This mixed-methods case study examined implementation of an adapted Self-Identified Need for Contraception (SINC) screening for all genders aged 12–44 in four Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA) primary care sites. We focused on assigned-male-at-birth (AMAB) patients, who are not typically exposed to routine opportunities to discuss contraception. We explored these study questions: How did screening rates vary over time by site and patient characteristics (sex, age and language)?; What did healthcare staff perceive as facilitators or challenges to implementation?; and how acceptable was adapted-SINC screening to AMAB patients?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>We estimated mixed effects models to analyze electronic health record (EHR) data on screening and need rates by site, sex, age, and language. We conducted interviews with CHA staff (<em>n</em> = 11) across two time points about implementation, and with AMAB patients (<em>n</em> = 28) about experiences and acceptability of screening. We used a convergent design, analyzing EHR and interview data in parallel and integrating findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>By quarter 4 (9–12 months after screening initiation) adjusted screening rates were significantly higher than quarter 1. At 15–18 months, unadjusted (raw) rates ranged from 39.0% to 79.0% by site and were 56.4%/44.6% for assigned-female-at-birth/AMAB patients. Interviews revealed key learnings about implementation facilitators. Both staff and AMAB patients found screening manageable, acceptable, and beneficial. All patient interviewees reported comfort with screening.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings provide actionable guidance for SINC implementation, including strategies to build buy-in, increase adoption, anticipate barriers, adapt workflows, and establish realistic timelines. Screening likely helped normalize contraceptive care and identify unmet contraceptive needs.</div></div><div><h3>Implications statement</h3><div>Implementing an adapted version of SINC screening in primary care with patients of all genders ages 12–44 was manageable and acceptable to staff and AMAB patients. The study contributes original insights from AMAB patients. This adapted-SINC likely helped normalize contraceptive care and surface unmet needs. Findings offer actionable guidance for organizations seeking to implement SINC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 111315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425005062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This mixed-methods case study examined implementation of an adapted Self-Identified Need for Contraception (SINC) screening for all genders aged 12–44 in four Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA) primary care sites. We focused on assigned-male-at-birth (AMAB) patients, who are not typically exposed to routine opportunities to discuss contraception. We explored these study questions: How did screening rates vary over time by site and patient characteristics (sex, age and language)?; What did healthcare staff perceive as facilitators or challenges to implementation?; and how acceptable was adapted-SINC screening to AMAB patients?

Study Design

We estimated mixed effects models to analyze electronic health record (EHR) data on screening and need rates by site, sex, age, and language. We conducted interviews with CHA staff (n = 11) across two time points about implementation, and with AMAB patients (n = 28) about experiences and acceptability of screening. We used a convergent design, analyzing EHR and interview data in parallel and integrating findings.

Results

By quarter 4 (9–12 months after screening initiation) adjusted screening rates were significantly higher than quarter 1. At 15–18 months, unadjusted (raw) rates ranged from 39.0% to 79.0% by site and were 56.4%/44.6% for assigned-female-at-birth/AMAB patients. Interviews revealed key learnings about implementation facilitators. Both staff and AMAB patients found screening manageable, acceptable, and beneficial. All patient interviewees reported comfort with screening.

Conclusions

Findings provide actionable guidance for SINC implementation, including strategies to build buy-in, increase adoption, anticipate barriers, adapt workflows, and establish realistic timelines. Screening likely helped normalize contraceptive care and identify unmet contraceptive needs.

Implications statement

Implementing an adapted version of SINC screening in primary care with patients of all genders ages 12–44 was manageable and acceptable to staff and AMAB patients. The study contributes original insights from AMAB patients. This adapted-SINC likely helped normalize contraceptive care and surface unmet needs. Findings offer actionable guidance for organizations seeking to implement SINC.
实施SINC(自我识别的避孕需求)筛查:一个混合方法的案例研究。
目的:这个混合方法的案例研究检查了在四个剑桥健康联盟(CHA)初级保健站点对12-44岁所有性别的自我识别避孕需求(SINC)筛查的实施情况。我们关注的是出生男性(AMAB)患者,他们通常没有常规机会讨论避孕。我们探讨了这些研究问题:筛查率如何随着时间的推移随地点和患者特征(性别、年龄和语言)而变化?卫生保健人员认为什么是实施的促进因素或挑战?适应性sinc筛查对AMAB患者的可接受程度如何?研究设计:我们估计了混合效应模型来分析电子健康记录(EHR)数据中按地点、性别、年龄和语言筛选和需求率的数据。我们在两个时间点对CHA工作人员(n=11)进行了关于实施的访谈,并对AMAB患者(n=28)进行了关于筛查经验和可接受性的访谈。我们采用融合设计,并行分析电子病历和访谈数据,并整合研究结果。结果:到第4季度(筛查开始后9-12个月),调整后的筛查率显著高于第1季度。在15-18个月时,未调整的(原始)比率在39.0%至79.0%之间,在指定的女性分娩/AMAB患者中为56.4%/44.6%。访谈揭示了关于实施促进者的关键知识。工作人员和AMAB患者都发现筛查是可控的、可接受的和有益的。所有患者受访者都表示对筛查感到满意。结论:研究结果为SINC的实施提供了可操作的指导,包括建立购买、增加采用、预测障碍、调整工作流程和建立现实时间表的策略。筛查可能有助于使避孕护理正常化,并确定未满足的避孕需求。意义声明:在12-44岁的所有性别患者的初级保健中实施改编版本的SINC筛查对工作人员和AMAB患者来说是可管理和可接受的。该研究提供了来自AMAB患者的原始见解。这种经过调整的sinc可能有助于使避孕护理正常化,并使未满足的需求浮出水面。调查结果为寻求实施SINC的组织提供了可操作的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书