Regulation in ecological systems: an overview.

IF 1 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Clarissa Machado Pinto Leite, Ítalo Nascimento de Carvalho, Jeferson Gabriel da Encarnação Coutinho, Charbel N El-Hani
{"title":"Regulation in ecological systems: an overview.","authors":"Clarissa Machado Pinto Leite, Ítalo Nascimento de Carvalho, Jeferson Gabriel da Encarnação Coutinho, Charbel N El-Hani","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00707-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of regulation is used in biology to explain properties such as stability, robustness, and long-term persistence of biological systems. Regulation claims often focus, however, on the capabilities of these systems, rather than the mechanisms underlying them. In an attempt to produce a full-fledged theoretical account of regulation, a stricter concept has been proposed by Bich and colleagues based on the theory of biological autonomy. According to these authors, regulation is exerted by specialized subsystems that can change the constitutive regime of a system (enabling it to deal with a wider range of perturbations) but whose dynamics are not specified by the latter. In this paper, we present a brief survey on how regulation has been treated in biology and, more specifically, in ecology. We show how the ecological literature attributes regulatory powers either to organismic phenomena or to the propagation of perturbations through the network of relations in ecological systems. We were not able to find any study proposing a specialized subsystem dedicated to regulation in an ecological system. This raises doubts about the feasibility of a regulatory subsystem such as conceived by Bich and colleagues. Nonetheless, we argue that ecological systems may encompass more than just dynamic stability and feedback mechanisms, such that it can be worthy applying their concept to investigate regulation in these systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-025-00707-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of regulation is used in biology to explain properties such as stability, robustness, and long-term persistence of biological systems. Regulation claims often focus, however, on the capabilities of these systems, rather than the mechanisms underlying them. In an attempt to produce a full-fledged theoretical account of regulation, a stricter concept has been proposed by Bich and colleagues based on the theory of biological autonomy. According to these authors, regulation is exerted by specialized subsystems that can change the constitutive regime of a system (enabling it to deal with a wider range of perturbations) but whose dynamics are not specified by the latter. In this paper, we present a brief survey on how regulation has been treated in biology and, more specifically, in ecology. We show how the ecological literature attributes regulatory powers either to organismic phenomena or to the propagation of perturbations through the network of relations in ecological systems. We were not able to find any study proposing a specialized subsystem dedicated to regulation in an ecological system. This raises doubts about the feasibility of a regulatory subsystem such as conceived by Bich and colleagues. Nonetheless, we argue that ecological systems may encompass more than just dynamic stability and feedback mechanisms, such that it can be worthy applying their concept to investigate regulation in these systems.

生态系统中的调控:综述。
调控的概念在生物学中被用来解释生物系统的稳定性、健壮性和长期持久性等特性。然而,监管要求往往侧重于这些系统的能力,而不是它们背后的机制。Bich和他的同事们在生物自主性理论的基础上,提出了一个更严格的概念,试图对调控提出一个成熟的理论解释。根据这些作者的说法,调节是由专门的子系统施加的,这些子系统可以改变系统的本构制度(使其能够处理更大范围的扰动),但其动力学不是由后者指定的。在本文中,我们简要介绍了如何在生物学中处理调节,更具体地说,在生态学中。我们展示了生态文献如何将调节权力归因于有机体现象或通过生态系统关系网络传播的扰动。我们没有找到任何研究提出一个专门的子系统,专门用于生态系统的调节。这使人们对Bich及其同事设想的监管子系统的可行性产生了怀疑。尽管如此,我们认为生态系统可能不仅仅包括动态稳定性和反馈机制,因此应用他们的概念来研究这些系统中的调节是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书