{"title":"Approaches to health promotion in higher education: A scoping review (2014-2024).","authors":"Manesh Muraleedharan, Dwight Figueiredo, Rechel Shrisunder, Sammita Jadhav","doi":"10.34172/hpp.025.44629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health promotion within higher education institutions is gaining increasing global attention, particularly in response to the growing health challenges faced by adolescents and young adults. This demographic often experiences a convergence of health-related issues, including poor dietary practices, substance use, mental health disorders, and obesity. These issues frequently interact in complex ways, influencing long-term health trajectories. This scoping review aimed to examine the breadth of strategies and research concerning health-promoting initiatives across universities worldwide, while identifying existing gaps in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024 using the SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. After screening and eligibility assessment, 272 articles were included in the final review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematically, 19% of studies focused on health-related policies and frameworks, 19% on mental health and wellness, 16% on technology-assisted interventions, 14% on physical activity, 7% on nutrition, 6% on behavioral habits, and others addressed curriculum restructuring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings reveal that most interventions remain in preliminary stages of implementation, with limited follow-up studies evaluating their effectiveness or cost-efficiency. There is a pressing need for robust, longitudinal research to assess outcomes, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, regional disparities-especially the limited representation from Sub-Saharan Africa-underscore the necessity for inclusive, globally coordinated research networks to foster equitable health promotion across diverse educational settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"15 3","pages":"236-244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12680519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.025.44629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Health promotion within higher education institutions is gaining increasing global attention, particularly in response to the growing health challenges faced by adolescents and young adults. This demographic often experiences a convergence of health-related issues, including poor dietary practices, substance use, mental health disorders, and obesity. These issues frequently interact in complex ways, influencing long-term health trajectories. This scoping review aimed to examine the breadth of strategies and research concerning health-promoting initiatives across universities worldwide, while identifying existing gaps in the literature.
Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024 using the SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. After screening and eligibility assessment, 272 articles were included in the final review.
Results: Thematically, 19% of studies focused on health-related policies and frameworks, 19% on mental health and wellness, 16% on technology-assisted interventions, 14% on physical activity, 7% on nutrition, 6% on behavioral habits, and others addressed curriculum restructuring.
Conclusion: Findings reveal that most interventions remain in preliminary stages of implementation, with limited follow-up studies evaluating their effectiveness or cost-efficiency. There is a pressing need for robust, longitudinal research to assess outcomes, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, regional disparities-especially the limited representation from Sub-Saharan Africa-underscore the necessity for inclusive, globally coordinated research networks to foster equitable health promotion across diverse educational settings.
背景:高等教育机构内的健康促进正在获得越来越多的全球关注,特别是为了应对青少年和青壮年面临的日益严重的健康挑战。这一人口结构经常遇到与健康相关的问题,包括不良饮食习惯、药物使用、精神健康障碍和肥胖。这些问题经常以复杂的方式相互作用,影响长期的健康轨迹。这一范围审查旨在检查全球大学健康促进倡议的战略和研究的广度,同时确定文献中存在的差距。方法:按照PRISMA-ScR指南,系统检索SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库中2014 - 2024年间发表的同行评议文章。经过筛选和资格评估,272篇文章被纳入最终评审。结果:从主题上看,19%的研究关注与健康相关的政策和框架,19%关注心理健康和保健,16%关注技术辅助干预,14%关注体育活动,7%关注营养,6%关注行为习惯,其他研究关注课程重组。结论:研究结果显示,大多数干预措施仍处于实施的初步阶段,评估其有效性或成本效益的后续研究有限。迫切需要进行强有力的纵向研究来评估结果,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。此外,区域差异——特别是撒哈拉以南非洲的代表性有限——强调了建立包容性、全球协调的研究网络的必要性,以便在不同的教育环境中促进公平的健康促进。