Evaluation of Intraoperative Gentamicin Bladder Irrigation for Mitigation of Urinary Tract Infections After Kidney Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-11-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joot/9377493
Aviad Gravetz, Vladimir Tennak, Mais Khamis, Vadym Mezhybovsky, Michael Gurevich, Sigal Eisner, Tasnim Lubani, Dana Bielopolski, Alaa Atamna, Fahim Kanani, Eviatar Nesher
{"title":"Evaluation of Intraoperative Gentamicin Bladder Irrigation for Mitigation of Urinary Tract Infections After Kidney Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Aviad Gravetz, Vladimir Tennak, Mais Khamis, Vadym Mezhybovsky, Michael Gurevich, Sigal Eisner, Tasnim Lubani, Dana Bielopolski, Alaa Atamna, Fahim Kanani, Eviatar Nesher","doi":"10.1155/joot/9377493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) remain the leading infectious complication after kidney transplantation. We evaluated intraoperative gentamicin bladder irrigation as a novel preventive strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind controlled trial at a tertiary transplant center (January-December 2021), 147 kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive intraoperative bladder irrigation with gentamicin (160 mg/250 mL) or saline during ureteroneocystostomy. Due to baseline imbalances, propensity score matching yielded 49 matched pairs. The primary endpoint was UTI incidence within 30 days post-transplant, defined by both microbiological (≥ 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL) and clinical criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UTI incidence was 26.5% (13/49) in controls versus 16.3% (8/49) with gentamicin (absolute risk reduction 10.2%, <i>p</i>=0.325). The number needed to treat was 10 overall. Striking sex-specific differences emerged: females demonstrated 40.7% baseline UTI risk versus 14.1% in males (<i>p</i>=0.004). Gentamicin efficacy varied markedly by sex, with the NNT of 5 for females (50.0%-30.8%) versus 17 for males (17.1%-11.1%). Living donor recipients showed greater benefit (NNT = 7) than deceased donor recipients (NNT = 23). No adverse events were attributable to gentamicin, with similar rates of bacteremia and surgical site infections between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative gentamicin bladder irrigation safely reduced early post-transplant UTIs by 38.5%, with efficacy in female recipients. While underpowered for statistical significance, the clinically meaningful effect size and excellent safety profile support considering this intervention for high-risk recipients, especially females, pending larger confirmatory trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9377493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12681396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joot/9377493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) remain the leading infectious complication after kidney transplantation. We evaluated intraoperative gentamicin bladder irrigation as a novel preventive strategy.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind controlled trial at a tertiary transplant center (January-December 2021), 147 kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive intraoperative bladder irrigation with gentamicin (160 mg/250 mL) or saline during ureteroneocystostomy. Due to baseline imbalances, propensity score matching yielded 49 matched pairs. The primary endpoint was UTI incidence within 30 days post-transplant, defined by both microbiological (≥ 105 CFU/mL) and clinical criteria.

Results: UTI incidence was 26.5% (13/49) in controls versus 16.3% (8/49) with gentamicin (absolute risk reduction 10.2%, p=0.325). The number needed to treat was 10 overall. Striking sex-specific differences emerged: females demonstrated 40.7% baseline UTI risk versus 14.1% in males (p=0.004). Gentamicin efficacy varied markedly by sex, with the NNT of 5 for females (50.0%-30.8%) versus 17 for males (17.1%-11.1%). Living donor recipients showed greater benefit (NNT = 7) than deceased donor recipients (NNT = 23). No adverse events were attributable to gentamicin, with similar rates of bacteremia and surgical site infections between groups.

Conclusions: Intraoperative gentamicin bladder irrigation safely reduced early post-transplant UTIs by 38.5%, with efficacy in female recipients. While underpowered for statistical significance, the clinically meaningful effect size and excellent safety profile support considering this intervention for high-risk recipients, especially females, pending larger confirmatory trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估术中庆大霉素膀胱冲洗对肾移植后尿路感染的缓解作用:一项随机对照试验的倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:尿路感染(uti)仍然是肾移植术后主要的感染并发症。我们评估术中庆大霉素膀胱冲洗作为一种新的预防策略。方法:在一项三级移植中心(2021年1月至12月)的随机、双盲对照试验中,147名肾移植受者在输尿管膀胱造口术中随机接受庆大霉素(160 mg/250 mL)或生理盐水膀胱冲洗。由于基线不平衡,倾向得分匹配产生了49对匹配。主要终点是移植后30天内尿路感染的发生率,由微生物学(≥105 CFU/mL)和临床标准定义。结果:对照组尿路感染发生率为26.5%(13/49),庆大霉素组为16.3%(8/49)(绝对风险降低10.2%,p=0.325)。总共需要治疗的人数为10人。出现了显著的性别差异:女性基线UTI风险为40.7%,男性为14.1% (p=0.004)。庆大霉素的疗效因性别而有显著差异,女性的NNT为5(50.0%-30.8%),男性为17(17.1%-11.1%)。活体供体接受者(NNT = 7)比已故供体接受者(NNT = 23)表现出更大的益处。庆大霉素没有引起不良事件,两组之间菌血症和手术部位感染的发生率相似。结论:术中庆大霉素膀胱冲洗安全地减少了38.5%的移植后早期尿路感染,对女性受体有效。虽然统计意义不足,但临床有意义的效应大小和良好的安全性支持考虑对高风险受体,特别是女性进行干预,等待更大规模的验证性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书