The local injustice of bankruptcy: geographical variation in access to debt relief in England

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
JOSEPH SPOONER, SAUL SCHWARTZ
{"title":"The local injustice of bankruptcy: geographical variation in access to debt relief in England","authors":"JOSEPH SPOONER,&nbsp;SAUL SCHWARTZ","doi":"10.1111/jols.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Personal insolvency law offers a vital safety net for individuals in financial difficulty. Nonetheless, disparities arise in access to the benefits of debt relief offered by insolvency law. In a context of geographical inequality and local gaps in access to justice, our original empirical study explores the substantial variation in personal insolvency rates across English local authority districts (LADs) – both in terms of total personal insolvencies, and of the proportion of insolvencies composed of longer-term, expensive repayment plans (individual voluntary arrangements (IVAs)) compared to rapid debt discharge procedures (bankruptcy and debt relief orders). Our model explains much of the local variation in total insolvencies and finds higher insolvency rates in LADs with lower median income levels. Crucially, however, economic variables do not explain local variation in the proportion of insolvencies composed of IVAs. Despite IVAs being designed for higher-income ‘can pay’ debtors, the IVA proportion is higher in LADs with lower median income levels. These findings imply that IVAs are not ‘rationally sorted’ based on economic conditions and add important evidence to the case for reforming personal insolvency law to address apparent inefficiencies and unfairness.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"52 4","pages":"606-627"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.70030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personal insolvency law offers a vital safety net for individuals in financial difficulty. Nonetheless, disparities arise in access to the benefits of debt relief offered by insolvency law. In a context of geographical inequality and local gaps in access to justice, our original empirical study explores the substantial variation in personal insolvency rates across English local authority districts (LADs) – both in terms of total personal insolvencies, and of the proportion of insolvencies composed of longer-term, expensive repayment plans (individual voluntary arrangements (IVAs)) compared to rapid debt discharge procedures (bankruptcy and debt relief orders). Our model explains much of the local variation in total insolvencies and finds higher insolvency rates in LADs with lower median income levels. Crucially, however, economic variables do not explain local variation in the proportion of insolvencies composed of IVAs. Despite IVAs being designed for higher-income ‘can pay’ debtors, the IVA proportion is higher in LADs with lower median income levels. These findings imply that IVAs are not ‘rationally sorted’ based on economic conditions and add important evidence to the case for reforming personal insolvency law to address apparent inefficiencies and unfairness.

Abstract Image

破产的地方不公正:英国获得债务减免的地域差异
个人破产法为财务困难的个人提供了重要的安全网。然而,在获得破产法提供的债务减免的好处方面出现了差距。在地理不平等和地方司法差距的背景下,我们最初的实证研究探讨了英格兰地方当局地区(LADs)个人破产率的实质性变化——无论是个人破产总额,还是由长期、昂贵的还款计划(个人自愿安排(IVAs))组成的破产比例,与快速债务清偿程序(破产和债务减免令)相比。我们的模型在很大程度上解释了破产总额的地方差异,并发现中等收入水平较低的地方政府的破产率较高。然而,至关重要的是,经济变量不能解释由IVAs组成的破产比例的地方差异。尽管IVA是为高收入“有能力支付”的债务人设计的,但IVA比例在收入中位数较低的lad中较高。这些发现表明,iva并没有根据经济状况进行“合理分类”,并为改革个人破产法以解决明显的低效率和不公平问题提供了重要证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书