Benefit of prophylactic pelvic irradiation in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study (iPPAPI)

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Charles Raynaud , Rafik Nebbache , Yazid Belkacemi , Cyrus Chargari , Catherine Durdux , Christophe Hennequin , Florence Huguet , Laurent Quero , Jean-Emmanuel Bibault
{"title":"Benefit of prophylactic pelvic irradiation in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study (iPPAPI)","authors":"Charles Raynaud ,&nbsp;Rafik Nebbache ,&nbsp;Yazid Belkacemi ,&nbsp;Cyrus Chargari ,&nbsp;Catherine Durdux ,&nbsp;Christophe Hennequin ,&nbsp;Florence Huguet ,&nbsp;Laurent Quero ,&nbsp;Jean-Emmanuel Bibault","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Context.</div><div>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common urologic malignancy in men, with most cases diagnosed at a localized stage. The benefit of whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) to eradicate subclinical nodal disease remains debated, particularly in intermediate-risk PCa. This study assessed the impact of WPRT in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter retrospective study within the AP-HP GRRAP program across five radiotherapy departments. Biopsy-proven intermediate-risk PCa (d’Amico classification) treated with conformational external beam radiotherapy between 2010 and 2019 were included. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), defined as time from diagnosis to biochemical, local, metastatic recurrence, or death. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and acute (&lt;6 months) or late (≥6 months) genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual toxicities (CTCAE v4.03/v5.0). Survival outcomes were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three hundred patients (60 per center) were included; 94 % received IMRT and 6 % 3D-RT. After a median follow-up of 77 months, univariate analysis showed no significant association between WPRT and RFS (HR; 0.61; 95 % CI, 0.26–1.42; p = 0.25). Multivariable analysis adjusted for clinical and treatment factors yielded similar results (HR, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.27 to 1.81; <em>p</em> = 0.46). OS results were also comparable. Rates of grade 2 acute or late toxicities were similar, but grade ≥ 3 late GI toxicity was higher with WPRT (14.3 % vs. 5.4 %; p = 0.045; OR 2.90).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In intermediate-risk PCa, WPRT did not improve RFS or OS compared with prostate-only RT but was associated with an increased risk of severe GI toxicity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825001855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common urologic malignancy in men, with most cases diagnosed at a localized stage. The benefit of whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) to eradicate subclinical nodal disease remains debated, particularly in intermediate-risk PCa. This study assessed the impact of WPRT in this population.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study within the AP-HP GRRAP program across five radiotherapy departments. Biopsy-proven intermediate-risk PCa (d’Amico classification) treated with conformational external beam radiotherapy between 2010 and 2019 were included. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), defined as time from diagnosis to biochemical, local, metastatic recurrence, or death. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and acute (<6 months) or late (≥6 months) genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual toxicities (CTCAE v4.03/v5.0). Survival outcomes were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox models.

Results

Three hundred patients (60 per center) were included; 94 % received IMRT and 6 % 3D-RT. After a median follow-up of 77 months, univariate analysis showed no significant association between WPRT and RFS (HR; 0.61; 95 % CI, 0.26–1.42; p = 0.25). Multivariable analysis adjusted for clinical and treatment factors yielded similar results (HR, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.27 to 1.81; p = 0.46). OS results were also comparable. Rates of grade 2 acute or late toxicities were similar, but grade ≥ 3 late GI toxicity was higher with WPRT (14.3 % vs. 5.4 %; p = 0.045; OR 2.90).

Conclusion

In intermediate-risk PCa, WPRT did not improve RFS or OS compared with prostate-only RT but was associated with an increased risk of severe GI toxicity.
多中心回顾性研究(iPPAPI):预防盆腔照射治疗中危前列腺癌的益处
上下文。前列腺癌(PCa)是男性最常见的泌尿系统恶性肿瘤,大多数病例在局部阶段诊断。全盆腔放疗(WPRT)根除亚临床淋巴结疾病的益处仍存在争议,特别是在中危PCa中。本研究评估了WPRT对该人群的影响。方法我们在5个放疗科室的AP-HP GRRAP项目中进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。纳入2010年至2019年期间接受构象外束放疗的活检证实的中危PCa (d 'Amico分类)。主要终点是无复发生存期(RFS),定义为从诊断到生化、局部、转移性复发或死亡的时间。次要终点是总生存期(OS)和急性(6个月)或晚期(≥6个月)泌尿生殖系统(GU)、胃肠道(GI)和性毒性(CTCAE v4.03/v5.0)。使用单因素和多因素Cox模型评估生存结果。结果纳入300例患者(每个中心60例);94%接受IMRT, 6%接受3D-RT。中位随访77个月后,单因素分析显示WPRT和RFS之间无显著相关性(HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.26-1.42; p = 0.25)。多变量分析调整了临床和治疗因素,结果相似(HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.27 ~ 1.81; p = 0.46)。OS结果也具有可比性。2级急性或晚期毒性发生率相似,但WPRT≥3级晚期胃肠道毒性较高(14.3% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.045; or 2.90)。结论:在中危PCa中,WPRT与单纯前列腺RT相比并没有改善RFS或OS,但与严重胃肠道毒性的风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书