Deep Learning-Based Cardiac MRI Planning from Localizers to Cine Views Using Landmark Detection

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2025.11.028
Durjoy D. Dhruba MS , Sawyer Goetz MD , Otavio Ferreira Dalla Pria MD , Thomas Reith MD , Abigail Reutzel MD , Pritish Y. Aher MD , Prashant Nagpal MD , Sarv Priya Dr, MD
{"title":"Deep Learning-Based Cardiac MRI Planning from Localizers to Cine Views Using Landmark Detection","authors":"Durjoy D. Dhruba MS ,&nbsp;Sawyer Goetz MD ,&nbsp;Otavio Ferreira Dalla Pria MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Reith MD ,&nbsp;Abigail Reutzel MD ,&nbsp;Pritish Y. Aher MD ,&nbsp;Prashant Nagpal MD ,&nbsp;Sarv Priya Dr, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.11.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>This study evaluates a fully automated deep learning framework to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of cardiac MRI planning.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective study, data from 1023 patients (ages 8–90 years) who underwent cardiac MRI were analyzed, including coronal, sagittal, axial localizers, and short-axis (SAX) and long-axis cine images. Experts manually annotated landmarks, serving as the ground truth for developing deep learning models. The models were assessed using 5-fold cross-validation. Performance metrics included median landmark distances and plane angle differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model achieved robust performance in landmark localization across all cardiac MRI planes. For localizer images, median distances were 5.1 mm (superior) and 7.2 mm (inferior) on coronal views, and 5.6 mm (superior) and 7.5 mm (inferior) on sagittal views. Median distances for axial, 2-chamber, and 4-chamber landmarks were 5.2 mm, 5.2 mm, and 5.6 mm, respectively. In short-axis mid slices, annotations based on the left ventricular center, right ventricular insertion points, and right ventricle obtuse angle had a median error of 5.2 mm, while basal slice valve-based annotations had 4.6 mm error. Angular deviations for SAX planning were 2.0° (2CH) and 1.5° (4CH). For long-axis views, angulation errors were lower using SAX mid slices (3.3° for 2CH, 2.6° for 4CH) compared to SAX base (4.0° and 3.9°, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A deep learning-based automated workflow for cardiac MRI planning is feasible with improved precision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 924-935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225010827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

This study evaluates a fully automated deep learning framework to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of cardiac MRI planning.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective study, data from 1023 patients (ages 8–90 years) who underwent cardiac MRI were analyzed, including coronal, sagittal, axial localizers, and short-axis (SAX) and long-axis cine images. Experts manually annotated landmarks, serving as the ground truth for developing deep learning models. The models were assessed using 5-fold cross-validation. Performance metrics included median landmark distances and plane angle differences.

Results

The model achieved robust performance in landmark localization across all cardiac MRI planes. For localizer images, median distances were 5.1 mm (superior) and 7.2 mm (inferior) on coronal views, and 5.6 mm (superior) and 7.5 mm (inferior) on sagittal views. Median distances for axial, 2-chamber, and 4-chamber landmarks were 5.2 mm, 5.2 mm, and 5.6 mm, respectively. In short-axis mid slices, annotations based on the left ventricular center, right ventricular insertion points, and right ventricle obtuse angle had a median error of 5.2 mm, while basal slice valve-based annotations had 4.6 mm error. Angular deviations for SAX planning were 2.0° (2CH) and 1.5° (4CH). For long-axis views, angulation errors were lower using SAX mid slices (3.3° for 2CH, 2.6° for 4CH) compared to SAX base (4.0° and 3.9°, respectively).

Conclusion

A deep learning-based automated workflow for cardiac MRI planning is feasible with improved precision.
基于深度学习的心脏MRI规划从定位器到使用地标检测的电影视图。
基本原理和目的:本研究评估了一个全自动深度学习框架,以提高心脏MRI计划的效率和准确性。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,分析了1023例(8-90岁)接受心脏MRI检查的患者的数据,包括冠状、矢状、轴向定位、短轴(SAX)和长轴电影图像。专家手动标注地标,作为开发深度学习模型的基础。采用5倍交叉验证对模型进行评估。性能指标包括中位数地标距离和平面角度差。结果:该模型在所有心脏MRI平面的地标定位方面取得了稳健的表现。对于定位器图像,冠状位上的中位距离为5.1 mm(上)和7.2 mm(下),矢状位上的中位距离为5.6 mm(上)和7.5 mm(下)。轴向、2室和4室标志的中位距离分别为5.2 mm、5.2 mm和5.6 mm。在短轴正中切片中,基于左心室中心、右心室插入点和右心室钝角的标注中值误差为5.2 mm,而基于基底片瓣的标注中值误差为4.6 mm。SAX规划的角度偏差分别为2.0°(2CH)和1.5°(4CH)。对于长轴视图,与SAX基片(分别为4.0°和3.9°)相比,使用SAX中片(2CH为3.3°,4CH为2.6°)的角度误差更低。结论:一种基于深度学习的心脏MRI规划自动化工作流程是可行的,并且精度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书